ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE AND SAVING BENEFIT OF EXTERNAL SHADING DEVICES VIA PHOTOVOLTAIC (PV) ENERGY GENERATION

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Pushkar

The aim of the study is to evaluate both environmental damage and saving benefit in selecting building shading devices. The environmental damage from the production and construction (P&C) of shading devices is evaluated. The saving benefit, i.e., decreasing building operation energy (OE), due to installing shading devices is evaluated. A simple office building module is used. The external shading devices are constructed from concrete-based external shading devices and aluminum-based light shelf devices. Energy design via Life Cycle Energy Assessment (LCEA) and environmental design via Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) are applied. Environmental design is performed when PV energy generation is used. It was found that in energy design, 40% of building OE saving benefit is required to compensate energy needed for the P&C of shading devices. In environmental design, 100% of the building OE saving benefit is required to compensate for environmental damage stemming from the P&C of shading devices. It was concluded that in energy design, in addition to OE, P&C energy should be evaluated. In environmental design, due to a major reduction in the OE saving benefit, the importance of the P&C environmental damage increased. Environmental design cannot be replaced with energy design when PV energy generation is assumed for building OE needs.

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 4083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Pushkar

The results of life-cycle assessments (LCAs) of concrete are highly dependent on the concrete design method. In this study, LCAs were conducted to evaluate the environmental impacts of the replacement of sand with furnace bottom-ash (FBA) in concrete. In the FBA-based concretes, sand was replaced with FBA at proportions of 0, 30, 50, 70, and 100 wt%. Two design methods were studied: (i) concrete with fixed slump ranges of 0–10 mm (CON-fix-SLUMP-0-10) and 30–60 mm (CON-fix-SLUMP-30-60); and (ii) concrete with fixed water/cement (W/C) ratios of 0.45 (CON-fix-W/C-0.45) and 0.55 (CON-fix-W/C-0.55). The ReCiPe2016 midpoint and single-score (six methodological options) methods were used to compare the environmental damage caused by the FBA-based concretes. A two-stage nested (hierarchical) analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to simultaneously evaluate the results of six ReCiPe2016 methodologies. The ReCiPe2016 results indicate that replacing sand with FBA decreased the environmental impact of the concretes with fixed slump ranges and increased the environmental impact of the concretes with fixed W/C ratios. Therefore, using FBA as a partial sand replacement in concrete production is of debatable utility, as its impact highly depends on the concrete design method used.


2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1076-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oyeshola F. Kofoworola ◽  
Shabbir H. Gheewala

Buildings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Hossein Omrany ◽  
Veronica Soebarto ◽  
Jian Zuo ◽  
Ruidong Chang

This paper aims to propose a comprehensive framework for a clear description of system boundary conditions in life cycle energy assessment (LCEA) analysis in order to promote the incorporation of embodied energy impacts into building energy-efficiency regulations (BEERs). The proposed framework was developed based on an extensive review of 66 studies representing 243 case studies in over 15 countries. The framework consists of six distinctive dimensions, i.e., temporal, physical, methodological, hypothetical, spatial, and functional. These dimensions encapsulate 15 components collectively. The proposed framework possesses two key characteristics; first, its application facilitates defining the conditions of a system boundary within a transparent context. This consequently leads to increasing reliability of obtained LCEA results for decision-making purposes since any particular conditions (e.g., truncation or assumption) considered in establishing the boundaries of a system under study can be revealed. Second, the use of a framework can also provide a meaningful basis for cross comparing cases within a global context. This characteristic can further result in identifying best practices for the design of buildings with low life cycle energy use performance. Furthermore, this paper applies the proposed framework to analyse the LCEA performance of a case study in Adelaide, Australia. Thereafter, the framework is utilised to cross compare the achieved LCEA results with a case study retrieved from literature in order to demonstrate the framework’s capacity for cross comparison. The results indicate the capability of the framework for maintaining transparency in establishing a system boundary in an LCEA analysis, as well as a standardised basis for cross comparing cases. This study also offers recommendations for policy makers in the building sector to incorporate embodied energy into BEERs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 102339
Author(s):  
Miguel A. Morales-Mora ◽  
Joep J.H. Pijpers ◽  
Alejandro Castillo Antonio ◽  
Javier de la Cruz Soto ◽  
Agustín Moisés Alcaraz Calderón

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document