scholarly journals Muslim Faith Leaders: De Facto Mental Health Providers and Key Allies in Dismantling Barriers Preventing British Muslims from Accessing Mental Health Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sazan Meran ◽  
Oliver Mason
Author(s):  
Katie A. Strong ◽  
Jenna Randolph

Purpose Aphasia is correlated with depression and anxiety, and it has a negative impact on quality of life. Aphasia is also frequently misunderstood among mental health care providers. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of mental health providers who provide services to people living with aphasia. Method Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to analyze interviews of six mental health providers who had some experience in providing services to people with aphasia. Results Three main themes among mental health care providers' experiences providing services to people with aphasia were identified: barriers, interprofessional collaboration, and therapy looks different. Subthemes associated with barriers included insufficient training and knowledge of aphasia, the stigma of receiving mental health services, and accessibility to services. Subthemes related to interdisciplinary collaboration included referrals, knowledge and awareness, and strategies and tools. Subthemes supporting therapy looks different included a new approach to therapy and challenges. Conclusions Mental health providers' experiences reveal the need for an action-oriented approach to overcome barriers, a nontraditional approach to talk therapy for people with aphasia, and increased collaboration with speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Future research should explore expanding the collaboration between SLPs and mental health providers to increase shared knowledge and skills in issues related to reducing depression and anxiety to support the well-being of people with aphasia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A786-A786
Author(s):  
Mariam Maksutova ◽  
Justine P Wu ◽  
Gnendy Indig ◽  
Molly Bennette Moravek ◽  
Elliot Popoff ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Hormone therapy can be an essential part of medical transition for some transgender people. Despite ongoing debate on the role of mental health providers in the initiation of gender-affirming hormones, little evidence exists to guide the discussion. We seek to elucidate the patient perspective on the feasibility, utility, risks, and benefits of mandatory mental health evaluation (MHE) prior to hormone initiation. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with individuals who have initiated gender-affirming hormone therapy (n=21). We purposively sampled respondents to include those who indicated that they were required to have mental health evaluation prior to hormone initiation, and those who did not. A transgender advisory board helped develop the semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using emergent and a priori codes. Results: The majority of respondents saw the requirement for MHE prior to hormone initiation as distinct from, and often discordant with, their mental health care. We identified the following roles of mental health care as seen by patients: 1) General psychosocial support; 2) Identity formation: therapy as a safe space to explore gender and self; and 3) Logistics: assistance navigating the healthcare system. Themes that emerged regarding the MHE requirement included 1) Access: for some, the MHE requirement delayed access to gender-affirming care; 2) “pathologizing my existence”: the effects of having one’s identity result in a diagnosis of mental disorder; and 3) “auditioning” for care: fear of being denied care if one does not present with a stereotypical transgender narrative. Many participants drew direct connections between the MHE requirement and negative effects on their mental health and the patient/provider relationship, while concurrently identifying mental health care as essential for wellbeing. Conclusion: While mental health care is appreciated, many transgender people see the universal MHE requirements as having significant negative implications on access, safety, and on even on their mental health. Guidelines should explicitly account for and mitigate the structural barriers preventing transgender individuals from accessing medical and mental health care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Knight ◽  
Michelle Vickery ◽  
Lauren Faust ◽  
Eyal Muscal ◽  
Alaina Davis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Suzanne M. Waddingham

Given the incidence of genitourinary trauma in service members surviving severe injury in Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom, all health care and mental health providers attending this population need to have an awareness of the extent of injury, the physical and psychosocial impacts, and the resulting approaches to care. It is also important that clinicians are comfortable with assessment for issues relating to sexual health and intimacy, capable adequately addressing these issues, familiar with military culture as a component to these issues, and familiar with treatment, intervention, and resources available to this population for these very specific and critical needs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 526-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia DiBenigno

Organizational life is rife with conflict between groups that pursue different goals, particularly when groups have strong commitments to professional identities developed outside the organization. I use data from a 30-month comparative ethnographic field study of four U.S. Army combat brigades to examine conflict between commanders who had a goal of fielding a mission-ready force and mental health providers who had a goal of providing rehabilitative mental health care to soldiers. All commanders and providers faced goal and identity conflict and had access to similar integrative mechanisms. Yet only those associated with two brigades addressed these conflicts in ways that accomplished the army’s superordinate goal of having both mission-ready and mentally healthy soldiers. Both successful brigades used what I call “anchored personalization” practices, which included developing personalized relations across groups, anchoring members in their home group identity, and co-constructing integrative solutions to conflict. These practices were supported by an organizational structure in which professionals were assigned to work with specific members of the other group, while remaining embedded within their home group. In contrast, an organizational structure promoting only anchoring in one’s home group identity led to failure when each group pursued its own goals at the expense of the other group’s goals. A structure promoting only personalization across groups without anchoring in one’s home group identity led to failure from cooptation by the dominant group. This study contributes to our understanding of how groups with strong professional identities can work together in service of their organization’s superordinate goals when traditional mechanisms fail.


2020 ◽  
pp. 107755872094270
Author(s):  
Priyanka Anand ◽  
Yonatan Ben-Shalom ◽  
Eric Schone

We use data from the 2012-2015 TRICARE Standard Survey to examine factors that affect civilian health care providers’ acceptance of patients covered by the U.S. Department of Defense’s TRICARE insurance program and Medicare. We find that 74% of physicians report that they accept new TRICARE patients compared with 83% accepting new Medicare patients; in contrast, only 36% of mental health providers report that they accept new Medicare and/or TRICARE patients. Among the most common reasons provided by both physicians and mental health providers for not accepting either insurance type are insufficient reimbursement or their specialty not being covered; lack of awareness of TRICARE is also frequently cited, particularly among mental health providers. These findings suggest that successful strategies to increase provider acceptance of TRICARE and Medicare may include improving reimbursement rates and specialty coverage and increasing provider awareness of TRICARE through outreach programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document