scholarly journals Comparison Between Internal and External DSLs via RubyTL and Gra2MoL

2012 ◽  
pp. 109-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Sánchez Cuadrado ◽  
Javier Luis Cánovas Izquierdo ◽  
Jesús García Molina
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
The Other ◽  
Model Transformations ◽  
Domain Specific Languages ◽  
Model Driven ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

Domain Specific Languages (DSL) are becoming increasingly more important with the emergence of Model-Driven paradigms. Most literature on DSLs is focused on describing particular languages, and there is still a lack of works that compare different approaches or carry out empirical studies regarding the construction or usage of DSLs. Several design choices must be made when building a DSL, but one important question is whether the DSL will be external or internal, since this affects the other aspects of the language. This chapter aims to provide developers confronting the internal-external dichotomy with guidance, through a comparison of the RubyTL and Gra2MoL model transformations languages, which have been built as an internal DSL and an external DSL, respectively. Both languages will first be introduced, and certain implementation issues will be discussed. The two languages will then be compared, and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach will be shown. Finally, some of the lessons learned will be presented.

scholarly journals Comparison between Internal and External DSLs via RubyTL and Gra2MoL

2014 ◽  
pp. 816-838
Author(s):  
Jesús Sánchez Cuadrado ◽  
Javier Luis Cánovas Izquierdo ◽  
Jesús García Molina
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
The Other ◽  
Model Transformations ◽  
Domain Specific Languages ◽  
Model Driven ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

Domain Specific Languages (DSL) are becoming increasingly more important with the emergence of Model-Driven paradigms. Most literature on DSLs is focused on describing particular languages, and there is still a lack of works that compare different approaches or carry out empirical studies regarding the construction or usage of DSLs. Several design choices must be made when building a DSL, but one important question is whether the DSL will be external or internal, since this affects the other aspects of the language. This chapter aims to provide developers confronting the internal-external dichotomy with guidance, through a comparison of the RubyTL and Gra2MoL model transformations languages, which have been built as an internal DSL and an external DSL, respectively. Both languages will first be introduced, and certain implementation issues will be discussed. The two languages will then be compared, and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach will be shown. Finally, some of the lessons learned will be presented.

scholarly journals Diversity of MDE Toolboxes and Their Uncommon Properties

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Gabriel Teixeira ◽  
Bruno Gabriel Araújo Lebtag ◽  
Fábio Paulo Basso
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Model Transformations ◽  
Model Driven Engineering ◽  
Domain Specific Languages ◽  
Search String ◽  
Model Driven ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
High Degree ◽  
High Diversity

Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) has reached some maturity. Due to that, a high diversity of technologies and platforms have emerged to support the resolution of a range of problems and contexts in which MDEis adopted as a solution. As a consequence, when some level of reuse of those artifacts (such as model transformations, Domain-Specific Languages(DSLs) and refinement tools), difficulties are faced due to the high diversity of formats in which all those assets are specified. Since we noted this trend, we decided to search for instances in the literature that supports our hypothesis of a high degree of diversity in MDE artifacts in the state of the practice. Thus, we carried out an exploratory literature review. As a result, we summarized key studies used as input to build a search string adopted to structure a future systematic literature review. Our study contributes by classifying nine types of MDE toolboxes with uncommon properties than those usually found in MDE workbenches.

scholarly journals Gade4all: Developing Multi-platform Videogames based on Domain Specific Languages and Model Driven Engineering

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Nu�ez-Valdez ◽  
Oscar Sanjuan-Martinez ◽  
Cristina Pelayo G-Bustelo ◽  
Juan Manuel Cueva-Lovelle ◽  
Guillermo Infante-Hernandez
Keyword(s):  
Model Driven Engineering ◽  
Domain Specific Languages ◽  
Model Driven ◽  
Domain Specific

Migrating JAVA to Mobile Platforms through HAXE

2016 ◽  
pp. 240-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Nicolás Díaz Bilotto ◽  
Liliana Favre
Keyword(s):  
Programming Language ◽  
Mobile Applications ◽  
Software Evolution ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
The Other ◽  
Model Transformations ◽  
Mobile Platforms ◽  
Model Driven ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
High Level

Software developers face several challenges in deploying mobile applications. One of them is the high cost and technical complexity of targeting development to a wide spectrum of platforms. The chapter proposes to combine techniques based on MDA (Model Driven Architecture) with the HaXe language. The outstanding ideas behind MDA are separating the specification of the system functionality from its implementation on specific platforms, managing the software evolution, increasing the degree of automation of model transformations, and achieving interoperability with multiple platforms. On the other hand, HaXe is a very modern high level programming language that allows us to generate mobile applications that target all major mobile platforms. The main contributions of this chapter are the definition of a HaXe metamodel, the specification of a model-to-model transformation between Java and HaXe and, the definition of an MDA migration process from Java to mobile platforms.

WEAVING DEPLOYMENT ASPECTS INTO DOMAIN-SPECIFIC MODELS

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (03) ◽  
pp. 403-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
KRISHNAKUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAN ◽  
ANIRUDDHA GOKHALE ◽  
YUEHUA LIN ◽  
JING ZHANG ◽  
JEFF GRAY
Keyword(s):  
Distributed System ◽  
Systems Development ◽  
Model Transformations ◽  
Modeling Language ◽  
Crosscutting Concerns ◽  
Model Driven Development ◽  
Model Driven ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Systems Model ◽  
Model Weaving

Domain-specific models increase the level of abstraction used to develop large-scale component-based systems. Model-driven development (MDD) approaches (e.g., Model-Integrated Computing and Model-Driven Architecture) emphasize the use of models at all stages of system development. Decomposing problems using MDD approaches may result in a separation of the artifacts in a way that impedes comprehension. For example, a single concern (such as deployment of a distributed system) may crosscut different orthogonal activities (such as component specification, interaction, packaging and planning). To keep track of all entities associated with a component, and to ensure that the constraints for the system as a whole are not violated, a purely model-driven approach imposes extra effort, thereby negating some of the benefits of MDD. This paper provides three contributions to the study of applying aspect-oriented techniques to address the crosscutting challenges of model-driven component-based distributed systems development. First, we identify the sources of crosscutting concerns that typically arise in model-driven development of component-based systems. Second, we describe how aspect-oriented model weaving helps modularize these crosscutting concerns using model transformations. Third, we describe how we have applied model weaving using a tool called the Constraint-Specification Aspect Weaver (C-SAW) in the context of the Platform-Independent Component Modeling Language (PICML), which is a domain-specific modeling language for developing component-based systems. A case study of a joint-emergency response system is presented to express the challenges in modeling a typical distributed system. Our experience shows that model weaving is an effective and scalable technique for dealing with crosscutting aspects of component-based systems development.

Building Domain-Specific Languages for Model-Driven Development

IEEE Software ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 48-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Sánchez Cuadrado ◽  
Jesús García Molina
Keyword(s):  
Domain Specific Languages ◽  
Model Driven Development ◽  
Model Driven ◽  
Domain Specific

scholarly journals Towards a model-driven approach for multiexperience AI-based user interfaces

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Planas ◽  
Gwendal Daniel ◽  
Marco Brambilla ◽  
Jordi Cabot
Keyword(s):  
User Interface ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
User Interfaces ◽  
The Other ◽  
Software Systems ◽  
Model Driven ◽  
Software Applications ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Faster Development ◽  
Model Driven Approach

AbstractSoftware systems start to include other types of interfaces beyond the “traditional” Graphical-User Interfaces (GUIs). In particular, Conversational User Interfaces (CUIs) such as chat and voice are becoming more and more popular. These new types of interfaces embed smart natural language processing components to understand user requests and respond to them. To provide an integrated user experience all the user interfaces in the system should be aware of each other and be able to collaborate. This is what is known as a multiexperience User Interface. Despite their many benefits, multiexperience UIs are challenging to build. So far CUIs are created as standalone components using a platform-dependent set of libraries and technologies. This raises significant integration, evolution and maintenance issues. This paper explores the application of model-driven techniques to the development of software applications embedding a multiexperience User Interface. We will discuss how raising the abstraction level at which these interfaces are defined enables a faster development and a better deployment and integration of each interface with the rest of the software system and the other interfaces with whom it may need to collaborate. In particular, we propose a new Domain Specific Language (DSL) for specifying several types of CUIs and show how this DSL can be part of an integrated modeling environment able to describe the interactions between the modeled CUIs and the other models of the system (including the models of the GUI). We will use the standard Interaction Flow Modeling Language (IFML) as an example “host” language.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document