Towards Patient-Driven Agile Supply Chains in Healthcare

2012 ◽  
pp. 1418-1436
Author(s):  
Véronique Nabelsi

Healthcare organizations in many countries are compelled to pursue drastic supply cost reductions, while continuing to improve patient health outcomes, as they must meet ever increasing economic and performance pressures brought on by changes in national health policies. As demonstrated in many other industries, these improvements require more integrated Supply Chain Management (SCM) practices, processes, and systems. The author develops a strategic framework for Customer-Oriented or Patient-Driven SCM, integrating the evolving economics of the healthcare industry and the emerging dynamics of global supply chains. The chapter focuses on modern SCM approaches such as agile and lean supply chains, in order to efficiently realign hospitals and their Material Management Systems (MMS) on patient health outcomes.

Author(s):  
Véronique Nabelsi

Healthcare organizations in many countries are compelled to pursue drastic supply cost reductions, while continuing to improve patient health outcomes, as they must meet ever increasing economic and performance pressures brought on by changes in national health policies. As demonstrated in many other industries, these improvements require more integrated Supply Chain Management (SCM) practices, processes, and systems. The author develops a strategic framework for Customer-Oriented or Patient-Driven SCM, integrating the evolving economics of the healthcare industry and the emerging dynamics of global supply chains. The chapter focuses on modern SCM approaches such as agile and lean supply chains, in order to efficiently realign hospitals and their Material Management Systems (MMS) on patient health outcomes.


2019 ◽  
pp. 23-52
Author(s):  
Nigel Nicholson ◽  
Nathan R. Selden

Chapter 1 explores different conceptions of the human body and their effect on medical care and patient health. Ancient Greek texts offer opposed conceptions of the body, with athletic sources presenting the body as immune to injury and always operating at its full potential and the Hippocratic texts presenting it as weak and highly vulnerable. Similarly divergent narratives also affect modern evaluations of the body by both patients and physicians, interfering with positive health outcomes. Physicians must recognize the operation of these narratives, challenge them with data, and promote a more realistic vision of health and success for patients and healthcare organizations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19104-e19104
Author(s):  
Tom Bregartner

e19104 Background: The Validation Model is an educational series built on the concept of strengthening education by incorporating the patient perspective. After conducting two iterations of the Validation Model to educate oncologists in the treatment of NSCLC, Quintiles Medical Education was able to demonstrate that CME can lead to improved patient health outcomes by changing physician behaviors in practice. Educational measurement tools, including chart audits, revealed an increase in tumor histology and EGFR mutation testing. Histologic and molecular marker testing leads to optimization of treatment based on tumor pathology and genotype, respectively, as per NCCN guidelines. Personalization of treatment according to guidelines results in improved health outcomes. Methods: The Validation Model consisted of 6 educational activities for which efficacy was measured by conducting pre- and post-tests of knowledge and clinical competence among participants. Participants were then asked to complete a follow-up survey which was designed to determine if specific practices had been implemented since participation. The self-self reported behavioral data was validated by the distribution of patient surveys, designed to measure patient satisfaction and expectation with care, and chart audits, designed to determine the actual practice habits of the participating practitioners. Results: More than 500 participants have completed all 6 of the educational activities. The activities have demonstrated improved knowledge and competence in the educational setting and changes to clinical practice and, as a result, patient health outcomes. Conclusions: CME can be used as an effective tool to improve patient health outcomes in the treatment of NSCLC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. A16.1-A16
Author(s):  
Mark Paramlall ◽  
Himanshu Tyagi

Consistent with the NHS quality agenda, Dept. of Health, 20111 there has been a drive to routinely incorporate outcome and performance measurement data in clinical practice. An absolute requirement within NHS services2 are Patient-Rated Outcome Measures (PROMS) which are used by some Royal College of Psychiatry faculties to quantify outcomes, improve accountability, performance management and service. They can also be used to screen for common health problems and ensure the comprehensive assessment of complex Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Patients who typically present with various neurological and psychiatric comorbidities.The North Bristol NHS Trust Outpatient Clinic at The Frenchay Brain Injury Rehabilitation Centre and The Rosa Burden, Southmead Hospital, conducts new assessments and regular patient reviews for referrals from South West England. As part of a quality improvement initiative a semi-structured process of assessment was trialled, to improve patient experience by providing a comprehensive initial assessment, improving treatment productivity and reducing over-running clinics.MethodReferrals were audited and common reasons for referrals identified. Questionnaires and tools used in the clinic were reviewed and those most frequently used were compiled. The evidence for questionnaires utilized for different psychiatric comorbidities and applicability in ABI was examined in the literature. The finalized patient questionnaires booklet section and their sequence was decided based on expert peer recommendations and patient feedback. The collateral section was similarly developed with some questionnaires modified for operational reasons.SECTION ONE: SELF RATED PRE-ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRERivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire (15): Somatic Screen, Patient Health Questionnaire-9: Depression screen, General Anxiety Disorder 7: Anxiety screen, Mood Disorder Questionnaire: Bipolar Affective Disorder screen and the Civilian Version PTSD Checklist.SECTION TWO: CARER/FAMILY PRE-ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIREModified Overt Aggression Scalescreen for aggression, Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire: assesses psychiatric symptoms in patients with neurological disordersOutcomeThe final booklet was divided into three sections:Patient-Rated, ObserverRated and Clinician Section. Consultation efficiency was improved with the Patient and Observer rated sections completed prior to the initial assessment. The checklist is used for all initial assessments with good uptake and allowed for standardization of clinical information gathering. PROMs for mood are collected at each clinic appointment with other domains repeated if abnormal at initial clinic assessment or clinically relevant.References Fossey M, Parsonage M. Outcomes and performance in liaison psychiatry: developing a measurement framework. Centre for Mental Health and Royal College of Psychiatrists Report June 2014. Trigwell P, Kustow J, Santhouse A, et al. Framework for routine outcome measurement in liaison psychiatry (FROM-LP): faculty of liaison psychiatry royal college of psychiatrists faculty report. The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2015. vretveit J, Zubkoff L, Nelson EC, et al. Using patient-reported outcome measurement to improve patient care. Int J Qual Health Care 2017 Oct 1;29(6):874879.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria M. Rizzo ◽  
Jeannine M. Rowe ◽  
Gayle Shier Kricke ◽  
Kate Krajci ◽  
Robyn Golden

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5284
Author(s):  
Michael Feehan ◽  
Leah A. Owen ◽  
Ian M. McKinnon ◽  
Margaret M. DeAngelis

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in clinical care offers great promise to improve patient health outcomes and reduce health inequity across patient populations. However, inherent biases in these applications, and the subsequent potential risk of harm can limit current use. Multi-modal workflows designed to minimize these limitations in the development, implementation, and evaluation of ML systems in real-world settings are needed to improve efficacy while reducing bias and the risk of potential harms. Comprehensive consideration of rapidly evolving AI technologies and the inherent risks of bias, the expanding volume and nature of data sources, and the evolving regulatory landscapes, can contribute meaningfully to the development of AI-enhanced clinical decision making and the reduction in health inequity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 292-294
Author(s):  
Shane Jackson

In early 2019, a report from Australia documented significant data about the harms associated with medication use. This editorial reports on the Australian government's changes to cycles-of-care and telehealth reviews, changes made to improve patient health outcomes, and payment to pharmacists—information that may be useful to other countries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-28
Author(s):  
Mike Lapaine

Healthcare institutions have for some time pursued the Triple Aim: improve patient health outcomes, improve patient experience, and reduce costs. More recently, it has been recognized that the “missing piece” of success is to improve the experience of their clinicians in order to improve the three aims. The leadership of Bluewater Health has been using the Quadruple Aim since 2016 and, by working to improve employee engagement, has succeeded in also delivering exemplary care that has improved patient outcomes and experience and reduced costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document