Formulation of Seismic Passive Resistance of Retaining Wall Backfilled with c-F Soil

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sima Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Pressure Coefficient ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Unit Weight ◽  
Passive Resistance ◽  
Angle Of Internal Friction ◽  
Variation Of Parameters ◽  
Wide Range

Knowledge of passive resistance is extremely important and it is the basic data required for the design of geotechnical structures like the retaining wall moving towards the backfill, the foundations, the anchors etc. An attempt is made to develop a formulation for the evolution of seismic passive resistance of a retaining wall supporting c-F backfill using pseudo-static method. Considering a planar rupture surface, the formulation is developed in such a way so that a single critical wedge surface is generated. The variation of seismic passive earth pressure coefficient are studied for wide range of variation of parameters like angle of internal friction, angle of wall friction, cohesion, adhesion, surcharge, unit weight of the backfill material, height and seismic coefficients.

Pseudo-Dynamic Active Earth Pressure on Battered Face Retaining Wall Supporting c-Φ Backfill Considering Curvilinear Rupture Surface

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-57
Author(s):  
Sima Ghosh ◽  
Arijit Saha
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Pressure Coefficient ◽  
Wedge Angle ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Horizontal Shear ◽  
Rupture Surface ◽  
Wide Range

In the present analysis, using the horizontal slice method and D'Alembert's principle, a methodology is suggested to calculate the pseudo-dynamic active earth pressure on battered face retaining wall supporting cohesive-frictional backfill. Results are presented in tabular form. The analysis provides a curvilinear rupture surface depending on the wall-backfill parameters. Effects of a wide range of variation of parameters like wall inclination angle (a), wall friction angle (d), soil friction angle (F), shear wave velocity (Vs), primary wave velocity (Vp), horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations (kh, kv) along with horizontal shear and vertical loads and non-linear wedge angle on the seismic active earth pressure coefficient have been studied.

Active pressure on gravity walls supporting purely frictional soils

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Loukidis ◽  
R. Salgado
Keyword(s):  
Critical State ◽  
Soil Mechanics ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Pressure Coefficient ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Soil Mass ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Foundation Soil ◽  
Surface Plasticity

The active earth pressure used in the design of gravity walls is calculated based on the internal friction angle of the retained soil or backfill. However, the friction angle of a soil changes during the deformation process. For drained loading, the mobilized friction angle varies between the peak and critical-state friction angles, depending on the level of shear strain in the retained soil. Consequently, there is not a single value of friction angle for the retained soil mass, and the active earth pressure coefficient changes as the wall moves away from the backfill and plastic shear strains in the backfill increase. In this paper, the finite element method is used to study the evolution of the active earth pressure behind a gravity retaining wall, as well as the shear patterns developing in the backfill and foundation soil. The analyses relied on use of a two-surface plasticity constitutive model for sands, which is based on critical-state soil mechanics.

Seismic passive resistance in soils for negative wall friction

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 971-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepankar Choudhury ◽  
K S. Subba Rao
Keyword(s):  
Limit Equilibrium ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Passive Earth Pressure ◽  
Passive Resistance ◽  
Pressure Coefficients ◽  
Logarithmic Spirals ◽  
Seismic Accelerations ◽  
The Individual

In the presence of pseudo-static seismic forces, passive earth pressure coefficients behind retaining walls were generated using the limit equilibrium method of analysis for the negative wall friction angle case (i.e., the wall moves upwards relative to the backfill) with logarithmic spirals as rupture surfaces. Individual density, surcharge, and cohesion components were computed to obtain the total minimum seismic passive resistance in soils by adding together the individual minimum components. The effect of variation in wall batter angle, ground slope, wall friction angle, soil friction angle, and horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations on seismic passive earth pressures are considered in the analysis. The seismic passive earth pressure coefficients are found to be highly sensitive to the seismic acceleration coefficients both in the horizontal and the vertical directions. The results are presented in graphical and tabular formats.Key words: seismic passive resistance, limit equilibrium, pseudo-static.

scholarly journals Impact of wall movements on the location of passive Earth thrust

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 570-581
Author(s):  
Meriem F. Bouali ◽  
Mahdi O. Karkush ◽  
Mounir Bouassida
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
General Assumption ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Wall Movement ◽  
Numerical Predictions ◽  
Test Models ◽  
Earth Pressures

Abstract The general assumption of linear variation of earth pressures with depth on retaining structures is still controversial; investigations are yet required to determine those distributions of the passive earth pressure (PEP) accurately and deduce the corresponding centroid location. In particular, for rigid retaining walls, the calculation of PEP is strongly dependent on the type of wall movement. This paper presents a numerical analysis for studying the influence of wall movement on the PEP distribution on a rigid retaining wall and the passive earth thrust location. The numerical predictions are remarkably similar to existing experimental works as recorded on scaled test models and full-scale retaining walls. It is observed that the PEP varies linearly with depth for the horizontal translation, but it is nonlinear when the movement is rotational about the top of the retaining wall. When rotation is around the top of the wall, the resultant of PEP is located at a depth that varies between 0.164 and 0.259H of the wall height measured from the base of the wall, which is lesser than 1/3 of the wall height. The passive earth thrust location is highly affected by the soil–wall friction angle, especially when the friction angle of the backfill material increases. Despite the herein presented results, further experiments are recommended to assess the corresponding numerical predictions.

Seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Failure Surface ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Nonlinear Variation ◽  
Seismic Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Planar Failure

This note describes a study on the seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical cantilever retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis. A planar failure surface has been considered behind the retaining wall. The effects of soil friction angle, wall inclination, wall friction angle, amplification of vibration, and horizontal and vertical earthquake acceleration on the active earth pressure have been explored in this study. Unlike the Mononobe–Okabe method, which incorporates pseudo-static analysis, the present analysis predicts a nonlinear variation of active earth pressure along the wall. The results have been compared with the existing values in the literature.

Sliding Stability of Retaining Wall Supporting c-Φ Backfill under Pseudo-Statically Seismic Active Load

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Sima Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Factor Of Safety ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Dynamic Factor ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Seismic Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Wedge Surface ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Sliding Stability

The sliding stability of retaining wall is one of the four important stability criteria for the safe design of retaining wall. Here an attempt is made to determine the sliding stability of retaining wall under seismic loading condition supporting c- F backfill considering both soil and wall inertia using pseudo-static method. The analysis for seismic active earth pressure for that particular study is done in such a way to develop a single critical wedge surface which is more realistic. The effect of wide range of variation of parameters like angle of internal friction of soil, angle of wall friction, cohesion, adhesion, seismic acceleration are studied on normalized seismic active earth pressure variation, wall inertia factor, thrust factor, combined dynamic factor and dynamic factor of safety against sliding. Results are presented in terms of formula for critical wedge surface and seismic active earth pressure and non-dimensional charts for the variation of different factors. Finally, a failure zone against sliding is recommended in the Factor of safety against sliding charts.

Pseudo-Dynamic Evolution of Seismic Passive Earth Force and Pressure Behind Retaining Wall

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Sima Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Method ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Dynamic Evolution ◽  
Linear Variation ◽  
Passive Earth Pressure ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Surface Inclination

This paper presents a detailed study on the seismic passive earth pressure behind a non-vertical cantilever retaining wall supporting inclined backfill, using pseudo-dynamic method. In addition to the consideration of wall and backfill surface inclination, the soil friction angle, wall friction angle, and both horizontal and vertical seismic coefficients are taken into account. From the obtained results, a non-linear variation of passive earth pressure along the height of the wall is observed. The results compare well with the existing values in research.

scholarly journals Dynamic Active Earth Pressures of the Retaining Piles with Anchors under Vehicle Loads

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hong-zhi Qiu ◽  
Ji-ming Kong ◽  
Ren-chao Wang
Keyword(s):  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Wall Friction ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Foundation Pit ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Earth Pressures ◽  
Method Effects ◽  
Vehicle Loads

The pile-anchor supporting structure is widely used in foundation pit engineering; then knowledge of active earth pressure on piles is very important for engineers. In this paper, based on the pseudodynamic method and considering the vehicle’s vibration characteristic, a method to calculate the earth pressure on piles under vehicle load is presented. At the same time, the constraint of anchor is simplified relation of lateral deformation of piles in present method. Effects of a wide range of parameters like rupture angle, vibration acceleration coefficient, wall friction angle, and soil friction angle on active earth pressure have been studied. Results are presented in terms of coefficients in the figures and comparison of the test data and the earth pressure calculated by M-O method and present study. The result shows that the measured earth pressure is accordant with the theoretical analysis, so the method in this paper is an effective basis for the calculation of earth pressure on piles under vehicle loads.

Coefficients of active earth pressure with seepage effect

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 651-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pérsio L.A. Barros ◽  
Petrucio J. Santos
Keyword(s):  
Pore Water Pressure ◽  
Water Pressure ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Drainage System ◽  
Numerical Procedure ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Plane Failure

A calculation method for the active earth pressure on the possibly inclined face of a retaining wall provided with a drainage system along the soil–structure interface is presented. The soil is cohesionless and fully saturated to the ground surface. This situation may arise during heavy rainstorms. To solve the problem, the water seepage through the soil is first analyzed using a numerical procedure based on the boundary element method. Then, the obtained pore-water pressure is used in a Coulomb-type formulation, which supposes a plane failure surface inside the backfill when the wall movement is enough to put the soil mass in the active state. The formulation provides coefficients of active pressure with seepage effect which can be used to evaluate the active earth thrust on walls of any height. A series of charts with values of the coefficients of active earth pressure with seepage calculated for selected values of the soil internal friction angle, the wall–soil friction angle, and the wall face inclination is presented.

Estimation of Active Earth Pressure on Retaining Wall with Translation Mode

2013 ◽  
Vol 639-640 ◽  
pp. 682-687
Author(s):  
Qing Guang Yang ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Shan Huang Luo
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Active Earth Pressure ◽  
Action Point ◽  
Layer Analysis ◽  
Earth Pressures ◽  
Reduction Coefficient ◽  
Point Of Intersection ◽  
Theoretical Results

Considering the movement effect of translation mode，friction angle reduction coefficient and method of bevel-layer analysis,estimation of active earth pressures is deduced for cohesiveless soil retaining wall with translation mode.In order to validate the feasibility of the proposed approach，a model test for active earth pressures was conducted in laboratory;and the proposed method was used to analyze this model. Experimental and theoretical results indicate that the curve of active earth pressure increases firstly and decreases then along the depth of retaining wall with different values of s/sc,and it has a point of intersection with the curve of Coulomb active earth pressure at the depth of 0.6H，where H is the wall height. Further study indicates that the action point position of the active earth pressure is higher than 1/3 times wall height.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document