Characterization of Welded Austenitic Stainless Steel Precipitation during Elevated Temperature

2013 ◽  
Vol 446-447 ◽  
pp. 288-290
Author(s):  
Pornpibunsompop Tosapolporn
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Elevated Temperature ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Weld Metal ◽  
Thermal Effect ◽  
Water Jet ◽  
Mass Change ◽  
Precipitation Temperature

The precipitation characterization of SUS 310S weld metal was investigated by TG/DSC and metallography technique. SMAW was selected for this study and then cut with water jet avoiding thermal effect. Austenitic is the main microstructure of weld metal because of high Creqv./Nieqv. Precipitation launched higher both %mass change and heat consumed as well as the precipitation temperature was around 800 degree Celsius.

Characterization of Hot-Steam Oxidation Tested Chromosiliconized Heat-Resistant Austenitic Stainless Steel

2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1090-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Hoshiyama ◽  
Xiaoying Li ◽  
Hanshan Dong ◽  
Akio Nishimoto
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Steam Oxidation ◽  
Heat Resistant

Characterization of Thermal Oxides on Austenitic Stainless Steel

2008 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 312-317
Author(s):  
Vesna Alar ◽  
Željko Alar ◽  
Vera Rede
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel

Characterization of thick and soft DLC coatings deposited on plasma nitrided austenitic stainless steel

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 73-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenia L. Dalibón ◽  
Daniel Heim ◽  
Christian Forsich ◽  
Andreas Rosenkranz ◽  
M. Agustina Guitar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Dlc Coatings

Residual Stress Evaluation of Ni Based Weld Metal Using Neutron Diffraction Method

2006 ◽  
Vol 524-525 ◽  
pp. 697-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinobu Okido ◽  
Hiroshi Suzuki ◽  
K. Saito
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Neutron Diffraction ◽  
Weld Metal ◽  
Diffraction Method ◽  
Fem Analysis ◽  
Butt Weld ◽  
Stress Evaluation ◽  
Neutron Diffraction Method

Residual stress generated in Type-316 austenitic stainless steel butt-weld jointed by Inconel-182 was measured using a neutron diffraction method and compared with values calculated using FEM analysis. The measured values of Type-316 austenitic stainless steel as base material agreed well with the calculated ones. The diffraction had high intensity and a sharp profile in the base metal. However, it was difficult to measure the residual stress at the weld metal due to very weak diffraction intensities. This phenomenon was caused by the texture in the weld material generated during the weld procedure. As a result, this texture induced an inaccurate evaluation of the residual stress. Procedures for residual stress evaluation to solve this textured material problem are discussed in this paper. As a method for stress evaluation, the measured strains obtained from a different diffraction plane with strong intensity were modified with the ratio of the individual elastic constant. The values of residual stress obtained using this method were almost the same as those of the standard method using Hooke’s law. Also, these residual stress values agreed roughly with those from the FEM analysis. This evaluation method is effective for measured samples with a strong texture like Ni-based weld metal.

Magnetic Characterization of SUS316L Deformed by High Pressure Torsion

2011 ◽  
Vol 239-242 ◽  
pp. 1300-1303
Author(s):  
Hong Cai Wang ◽  
Minoru Umemoto ◽  
Innocent Shuro ◽  
Yoshikazu Todaka ◽  
Ho Hung Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Deformation ◽  
High Pressure ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Phase Transformation ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Volume Fraction ◽  
High Pressure Torsion ◽  
Austenitic Matrix ◽  
Magnetic Characterization

SUS316L austenitic stainless steel was subjected to severe plastic deformation (SPD) by the method of high pressure torsion (HPT). From a fully austenitic matrix (γ), HPT resulted in phase transformation from g®a¢. The largest volume fraction of 70% a¢ was obtained at 0.2 revolutions per minute (rpm) while was limited to 3% at 5rpm. Pre-straining of g by HPT at 5rpm decreases the volume fraction of a¢ obtained by HPT at 0.2rpm. By HPT at 5rpm, a¢®g reverse transformation was observed for a¢ produced by HPT at 0.2rpm.

Nanoindentation characterization of nano-twinned grains in an austenitic stainless steel

2016 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.K. Yan ◽  
B.B. Zhang ◽  
H.T. Wang ◽  
N.R. Tao ◽  
K. Lu
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document