Evaluation of Additive Friction Stir Deposition of AISI 316L For Repairing Surface Material Loss in AISI 4340

Additive technologies provide a means for repair of various failure modes associated with material degradation occurring during use in aggressive environments. Possible repair strategies for AISI 4340 steel using AISI 316L deposited by additive friction stir deposition (AFSD) were evaluated under this research by metallography, microhardness, and wear and mechanical testing. Two repair geometries were investigated: groove-filling and surface cladding. The former represents repair of localized grinding to eliminate cracks, while the latter represents material replacement over a larger area, for example to repair general corrosion or wear. The 316L deposited by AFSD exhibited a refined microstructure with decreased grain size and plastic strain, lower strength, and lower hardness than the as-received feedstock. Wear testing by both two-body abrasion and erosion by particle impingement indicated that the wear resistance of the 316L cladding was as good as, or better than, the substrate 4340 material; however, there was some evidence that the resistance to intergranular corrosion was compromised due to the formation of carbides or sigma phase. In both repair geometries, the microstructure of the substrate beneath the deposited material exhibited heat affected zones that appeared to have austenized during the deposition process, and transformed to martensite or bainite during cooling. This report constitutes an initial evaluation of a novel approach to the repair of structural steel components damaged by microcracking, wear or corrosion.

Improving the Corrosion Resistance of AISI 316L Steel for Semiconductor Piping by Controlled Delta-Ferrite Content

This study evaluated changes in delta-ferrite content depending on the preheating of AISI 316L stainless steel. We also determined the reasons for the variation in delta-ferrite content, which affects corrosion resistance. Changes in delta-ferrite content after preheating was confirmed using a Feritscope, and the microstructure was analyzed using optical microscopy (OM). We found that the delta-ferrite microstructure size decreased when preheating time was increased at 1295 oC, and that the delta-ferrite content could be controlled through preheating. Potentiodynamic polarization test were carried out in NaCl (0.5 M) + H2SO4 (0.5 M) solution, and it was found that higher delta-ferrite content resulted in less corrosion potential and passive potential. To determine the cause, an analysis was conducted using energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), which confirmed that higher delta-ferrite content led to weaker corrosion resistance, due to Cr degradation at the delta-ferrite and austenite boundaries. The degradation of Cr on the boundaries between austenite and delta-ferrite can be explained by the difference in the diffusion coefficient of Cr in the ferrite and austenite. A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of material used for actual semiconductor piping confirmed that corrosion begins at the delta-ferrite and austenite boundaries. These results confirm the need to control delta-ferrite content in AISI 316L stainless steel used for semiconductor piping.

The properties of AISI 316L steel after surface treatment with Ti surface alloy and a-C:H:SiOx coating

The paper presents the research results of corrosion and mechanical properties of the AISI 316L stainless steel after the surface treatment. This treatment includes the formation of the titanium-based surface alloy provided by the low-energy high-current electron beam. The obtained surface alloy used as an underlayer, is then coated with the a-C:H:SiOx film using the PACVD method. It is shown that such a combined treatment of the steel surface improves its corrosion resistance, i. e., reduces the current density from 110-7 to 910-10 A/cm2 and corrosion rate from 1.110-3 to 9.310-6 mm/year. The resulted modified steel surface possesses high mechanical and tribological properties

Combined Corrosion Inhibitors and Mechanical Properties of Concrete Embedded Steel (AISI 316L) during Accelerated Saline Corrosion Test

The objective of this effort is to study the effect that the combination of fly ash (FA) with a liquid corrosion inhibitor has on the mechanical degradation of 316L rebars embedded in concrete specimens during salt fog testing for a period of four months, as well as the porosity of concrete. Partial replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) by FA (0–25%) did not significantly affect the tensile properties of 316L except a small decrease in the elastic modulus and % elongation with FA increasing. Both FA and FA-liquid inhibitor combination resulted in significant reductions in the porosity of the reinforced concrete after 4 m of salt fog testing.

Influence of Ring-Shaped Beam Profiles on Process Stability and Productivity in Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion of AISI 316L

A major factor slowing down the establishment of additive manufacturing processes as production processes is insufficient reproducibility and productivity. Therefore, this work investigates the influence of ring-shaped beam profiles on process stability and productivity in laser-based powder bed fusion of AISI 316L. For this purpose, the weld track geometries of single tracks and multi-track segments with varying laser power, scan speed, hatch distance, and beam profile (Gaussian profile and three different ring-shaped profiles) are analyzed. To evaluate the process robustness, process windows are identified by classifying the generated single tracks into different process categories. The influence of the beam profiles on productivity is studied by analyzing the molten cross-sectional areas and volumes per time. When using ring-shaped beam profiles, the process windows are significantly larger (up to a laser power of 1050 W and a scanning speed of 1700 mm/s) than those of Gaussian beams (laser power up to 450 W and scanning speed up to 1100 mm/s), which suggests a higher process robustness and stability. With ring-shaped beam profiles, larger volumes can be stably melted per track and time. The weld tracks created with ring-shaped profiles are significantly wider than those generated with Gaussian profiles (up to factor 2 within the process window), allowing enlargement of the hatch distances. Due to the higher scanning speeds and the enlarged hatch distances for ring-shaped beam profiles, the process can be accelerated by a factor of approximately 2 in the parameter range investigated.

The Effect of a Slow Strain Rate on the Stress Corrosion Resistance of Austenitic Stainless Steel Produced by the Wire Laser Additive Manufacturing Process

The wire laser additive manufacturing (WLAM) process is considered a direct-energy deposition method that aims at addressing the need to produce large components having relatively simple geometrics at an affordable cost. This additive manufacturing (AM) process uses wires as raw materials instead of powders and is capable of reaching a deposition rate of up to 3 kg/h, compared with only 0.1 kg/h with common powder bed fusion (PBF) processes. Despite the attractiveness of the WLAM process, there has been only limited research on this technique. In particular, the stress corrosion properties of components produced by this technology have not been the subject of much study. The current study aims at evaluating the effect of a slow strain rate on the stress corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel produced by the WLAM process in comparison with its counterpart: AISI 316L alloy. Microstructure examination was carried out using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction analysis, while the mechanical properties were evaluated using tensile strength and hardness measurements. The general corrosion resistance was examined by potentiodynamic polarization and impedance spectroscopy analysis, while the stress corrosion performance was assessed by slow strain rate testing (SSRT) in a 3.5% NaCl solution at ambient temperature. The attained results highlight the inferior mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and stress corrosion performance, especially at a slow strain rate, of the WLAM samples compared with the regular AISI 316L alloy. The differences between the WLAM alloy and AISI 316L alloy were mainly attributed to their dissimilarities in terms of phase compositions, structural morphology and inherent defects.