Modeling of Cure-Induced Residual Stresses in 3D Woven Composites of Different Reinforcement Architectures

2013 ◽  
Vol 577-578 ◽  
pp. 253-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Tsukrov ◽  
Borys Drach ◽  
Harun Bayraktar ◽  
Jon Goering
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Residual Stresses ◽  
Finite Element Modeling ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Woven Composites ◽  
Element Modeling ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
3D Woven Composites ◽  
Resin Curing

This paper presents finite element modeling effort to predict possible microcracking of the matrix in 3D woven composites during curing. Three different reinforcement architectures are considered: a ply-to-ply weave, a one-by-one and a two-by-two orthogonal through-thickness reinforcement. To realistically reproduce the as-woven geometry of the fabric, the data from the Digital Fabric Mechanics Analyzer software is used as input for finite element modeling. The curing processed is modeled in a simplified way as a uniform drop in temperature from the resin curing to room temperature. The simulations show that the amount of residual stress is strongly influenced by the presence of through-thickness reinforcement.

Comparison of Two Approaches to Model Cure-Induced Microcracking in Three-Dimensional Woven Composites

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Tsukrov ◽  
Michael Giovinazzo ◽  
Kateryna Vyshenska ◽  
Harun Bayraktar ◽  
Jon Goering ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Residual Stresses ◽  
Volume Fraction ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Woven Composites ◽  
Finite Element Models ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
3D Woven Composites ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Resin Curing

Finite element models of 3D woven composites are developed to predict possible microcracking of the matrix during curing. A specific ply-to-ply weave architecture for carbon fiber reinforced epoxy is chosen as a benchmark case. Two approaches to defining the geometry of reinforcement are considered. One is based on the nominal description of composite, and the second involves fabric mechanics simulations. Finite element models utilizing these approaches are used to calculate the overall elastic properties of the composite, and predict residual stresses due to resin curing. It is shown that for the same volume fraction of reinforcement, the difference in the predicted overall in-plane stiffness is on the order of 10%. Numerical model utilizing the fabric mechanics simulations predicts lower level of residual stresses due to curing, as compared to nominal geometry models.

scholarly journals Finite Element Modeling of Residual Stress at Joint Interface of Titanium Alloy and 17-4PH Stainless Steel

Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 629
Author(s):  
Nana Kwabena Adomako ◽  
Sung Hoon Kim ◽  
Ji Hong Yoon ◽  
Se-Hwan Lee ◽  
Jeoung Han Kim
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Finite Element Modeling ◽  
Equivalent Stress ◽  
Stress Gradient ◽  
Joint Interface ◽  
Element Modeling ◽  
Actual Experiment ◽  
Maximum Equivalent Stress

Residual stress is a crucial element in determining the integrity of parts and lifetime of additively manufactured structures. In stainless steel and Ti-6Al-4V fabricated joints, residual stress causes cracking and delamination of the brittle intermetallic joint interface. Knowledge of the degree of residual stress at the joint interface is, therefore, important; however, the available information is limited owing to the joint’s brittle nature and its high failure susceptibility. In this study, the residual stress distribution during the deposition of 17-4PH stainless steel on Ti-6Al-4V alloy was predicted using Simufact additive software based on the finite element modeling technique. A sharp stress gradient was revealed at the joint interface, with compressive stress on the Ti-6Al-4V side and tensile stress on the 17-4PH side. This distribution is attributed to the large difference in the coefficients of thermal expansion of the two metals. The 17-4PH side exhibited maximum equivalent stress of 500 MPa, which was twice that of the Ti-6Al-4V side (240 MPa). This showed good correlation with the thermal residual stress calculations of the alloys. The thermal history predicted via simulation at the joint interface was within the temperature range of 368–477 °C and was highly congruent with that obtained in the actual experiment, approximately 300–450 °C. In the actual experiment, joint delamination occurred, ascribable to the residual stress accumulation and multiple additive manufacturing (AM) thermal cycles on the brittle FeTi and Fe2Ti intermetallic joint interface. The build deflected to the side at an angle of 0.708° after the simulation. This study could serve as a valid reference for engineers to understand the residual stress development in 17-4PH and Ti-6Al-4V joints fabricated with AM.

Finite element modeling of residual stress profile patterns in hard turning

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. S22-S25
Author(s):  
Y. B. Guo ◽  
S. Anurag
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Finite Element Modeling ◽  
Hard Turning ◽  
Internal State ◽  
Stress Profile ◽  
Surface Residual Stress ◽  
Mechanical Coupling ◽  
Element Modeling ◽  
Stress Profiles

Hard turning, i.e., turning hardened steels, may produce the unique “hook” shaped residual stress (RS) profile characterized by surface compressive RS and subsurface maximum compressive RS. However, the formation mechanism of the unique RS profile is not yet known. In this study, a novel hybrid finite element modeling approach based on thermal-mechanical coupling and internal state variable plasticity model has been developed to predict the unique RS profile patterns by hard turning AISI 52100 steel (62 HRc). The most important controlling factor for the unique characteristics of residual stress profiles has been identified. The transition of maximum residual stress at the surface to the subsurface has been recovered by controlling the plowed depth. The predicted characteristics of residual stress profiles favorably agree with the measured ones. In addition, friction coefficient only affects the magnitude of surface residual stress but not the basic shape of residual stress profiles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document