Steel Reinforcement Corrosion in a Low Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete

2016 ◽  
Vol 711 ◽  
pp. 943-949
Author(s):  
Mahdi Babaee ◽  
Arnaud Castel
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Steel Corrosion ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
Geopolymer Concrete ◽  
Reinforcement Corrosion ◽  
Portland Cement Concrete ◽  
Electrochemical Test ◽  
Free Corrosion Potential ◽  
Low Calcium

Geopolymer concrete (GPC) has significant potential as a more sustainable, low-embodied carbon alternative for ordinary Portland cement concrete (PCC). However; as a rather new engineering material, there are some concerns over the durability aspects of geopolymeric binders. In this study, performance of chloride contaminated reinforced GPC specimens manufactured using low calcium fly ash is investigated by long-term monitoring of corrosion parameters such as free corrosion potential and polarization resistance. It was found that low calcium fly ash GPC can perform as well as PCC during the propagation phase of corrosion; although, some conventional reference values of corrosion parameters which are indicative of severity of the steel corrosion in PCC are not suitable for GPC. Additionally, commonly used electrochemical test methods are successfully employed to assess the degree of reinforcement corrosion in geopolymeric binders within an acceptable level of accuracy.

scholarly journals Practical Prediction Models of Tensile Strength and Reinforcement-Concrete Bond Strength of Low-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 875
Author(s):  
Chenchen Luan ◽  
Qingyuan Wang ◽  
Fuhua Yang ◽  
Kuanyu Zhang ◽  
Nodir Utashev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Fly Ash ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Splitting Tensile Strength ◽  
Geopolymer Concrete ◽  
Structural Factors ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Portland Cement Concrete ◽  
Low Calcium

There have been a few attempts to develop prediction models of splitting tensile strength and reinforcement-concrete bond strength of FAGC (low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete), however, no model can be used as a design equation. Therefore, this paper aimed to provide practical prediction models. Using 115 test results for splitting tensile strength and 147 test results for bond strength from experiments and previous literature, considering the effect of size and shape on strength and structural factors on bond strength, this paper developed and verified updated prediction models and the 90% prediction intervals by regression analysis. The models can be used as design equations and applied for estimating the cracking behaviors and calculating the design anchorage length of reinforced FAGC beams. The strength models of PCC (Portland cement concrete) overestimate the splitting tensile strength and reinforcement-concrete bond strength of FAGC, so PCC’s models are not recommended as the design equations.

scholarly journals Alkali-Silica Reaction Resistance and Pore Solution Composition of Low-Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Jiawei Lei ◽  
Jiajun Fu ◽  
En-Hua Yang
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Pore Solution ◽  
Systematic Investigation ◽  
Alkali Silica Reaction ◽  
Geopolymer Concrete ◽  
Portland Cement Concrete ◽  
Solution Composition ◽  
Low Calcium ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
One Year

Low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete is generally reported to be less vulnerable to alkali-silica reaction (ASR) than conventional ordinary Portland cement concrete. However, the lack of understanding of pore solution composition of the low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer limits the investigation of the underlying mechanisms for the low ASR-induced expansion in the geopolymer concrete. This study presents a systematic investigation of the pore solution composition of a low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer over a period of one year. The results show that the pore solution of the fly ash geopolymer is mainly composed of alkali ions, silicates, and aluminosilicates species. The lower expansion of the geopolymer concrete in the current study is most probably due to the insufficient alkalinity in the geopolymer pore solution as the hydroxide ions are largely consumed for the fly ash dissolution.

Compressive stress-strain model for low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer and heat-cured Portland cement concrete

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 136-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Noushini ◽  
Farhad Aslani ◽  
Arnaud Castel ◽  
Raymond Ian Gilbert ◽  
Brian Uy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Portland Cement ◽  
Compressive Stress ◽  
Portland Cement Concrete ◽  
Cement Concrete ◽  
Stress Strain ◽  
Low Calcium ◽  
Strain Model

scholarly journals Deterioration and Microstructural Evolution of the Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete against MgSO4Solution

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Long ◽  
Qingyuan Wang ◽  
Zhongwei Guan ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Xiaoshuang Shi
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Fly Ash ◽  
Magnesium Sulfate ◽  
Strength Loss ◽  
Sulfate Attack ◽  
Aluminum Silicate ◽  
Geopolymer Concrete ◽  
Portland Cement Concrete ◽  
Sodium Aluminum Silicate ◽  
Magnesium Aluminum Silicate

Fly ash geopolymer concrete (FAGC) and ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPCC) specimens were immersed in 5% MgSO4solution undergoing 32 wetting-drying and heating-cooling cycles. Their compressive behavior was investigated after every 8 cycles. Several microstructure analysis techniques were applied on the samples to identify the materials formed due to magnesium sulfate attack, including XRD, FTIR, SEM, and EDS. Experimental results elucidated that the compressive strength loss ratio in the heating group of FAGC was 12.7%, while that of OPCC was 17.8%, which means that FAGC had better magnesium sulfate resistance than OPCC. The compressive strength loss of OPCC was due to the formation of gypsum under the magnesium sulfate attack exposed to wetting-drying and heating-cooling cycles. The deterioration mechanisms of FAGC against MgSO4solution were discovered to be that sodium aluminum silicate hydrate (N-A-S-H) gels reacted with MgSO4, leading to the creation of low strength magnesium aluminum silicate hydrate (M-A-S-H) gels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document