Mechanical Property of Roll Cast Al-11%Si Alloy

2014 ◽  
Vol 794-796 ◽  
pp. 461-466
Author(s):  
Toshio Haga
Keyword(s):  
Deep Drawing ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Drawing Ratio ◽  
Drawing Test ◽  
Fe Content ◽  
Eutectic Si ◽  
Twin Roll Caster ◽  
Deep Drawing Test ◽  
Twin Roll

Al-11%Si (-0.44%Fe-0.16%Cu-0.14%Mg) was cast into the strip using a vertical type high speed twin roll caster at speed of 60m/min. Cooling rate of the strip was ranging from 2000OC/s at surface to 1000OC/s at center of thickness. The eutectic Si was smaller than 2μm. The homogenization, cold rolling down to 1mm, and annealing were carried out before the tension test, 180 degrees bending test and deep drawing test. Tensile stress was 192MPa, 0.2%proof stress was 84MPa, and elongation was 23.8%. Roll cast Al-11%Si had excellent elongation. The specimen was not broken by the 180 degree bending. LDR (Limiting Drawing Ratio) of the deep drawing test was 1.8. The ductility was drastically improved by the high speed twin roll caster. These results show that roll cast Al-11%Si has ability to be used for sheet forming. Moreover, Fe was increased up to 1.0% as the model of recycled alloy. The elongation was 15.9% and LDR was 1.7 in the condition that Fe content was 1.0%. Al-Si-Fe intermetallic became fine by the effect of rapid solidification. As the result, deterioration of the ductility was improved.

High Speed Twin-Roll Casting of Al-Mg Alloys

2010 ◽  
Vol 154-155 ◽  
pp. 1544-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Komeda ◽  
Ryoji Nakamura ◽  
Shinji Kumai
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Aluminum Alloy ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Aluminum Alloy 5182 ◽  
Roll Casting ◽  
Twin Roll Caster ◽  
Deep Drawing Test ◽  
Study Heat Transfer ◽  
Twin Roll ◽  
Steel Rolls

The disadvantages of the conventional twin-roll caster for aluminum alloy are low casting speeds and limited choices of alloys that are castable by this processing. It is known that strip casting of aluminum alloy 5182 is very difficult because of their wider freezing zones. The vertical-type high-speed twin-roll caster used in the present study was devised to overcome these disadvantages. Features of the high speed twin roll casters are as below. Mild steel rolls were used in order to increase the casting speed and to be made at a lower equipment cost. Roll coating is produced in casting of Al-Mg alloy. Therefore lubricant, that resists heat transfer, was not used in the present study. Heat transfer between melt and the roll was improved by hydrostatic pressure of the melt. Low superheat casting was carried out in order to improve microstructure of the strip. In the present study, effectiveness of a high-speed twin roll caster for recycling aluminum alloy was investigated. The effects of the high-speed twin roll caster on alleviating the deterioration of mechanical properties by impurities were investigated. Properties of the cast strip were investigated by metalography, a tension test, and a deep drawing test.

Single Roll Caster Equipped with a Scraper

2012 ◽  
Vol 504-506 ◽  
pp. 1243-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Haga ◽  
Kazuya Akitsu ◽  
Keisuke Kamakura ◽  
Shinji Kumai ◽  
Hisaki Watari
Keyword(s):  
Contact Surface ◽  
Outer Side ◽  
Rolled Strip ◽  
Drawing Ratio ◽  
Cast Strip ◽  
Strip Cast ◽  
Cold Rolled ◽  
Twin Roll Caster ◽  
Deep Drawing Test ◽  
Twin Roll

A scraper was developed and attached to the single roll caster in order to improve the free solidified surface of as-cast strip cast. Semisolid metal on the free solidified surface was flattened by the scraper and the surface became flat. The AA5182 aluminum alloy could be cast at speeds up to 40m/min. Thickness was about 3mm. Pressure of the unit width of the scraper was ranging from 0.1N/mm to 1.0N/mm, and these pressure was enough to make the free solidified surface flat. Center line segregation did not occur as the strip was solidified from single side at the strip cast by the single roll caster. Roll-cast strip could be cold rolled down to 1mm. There was not difference between the roll contact surface and the free solidified surface of the strip after cold rolling judging by a visual examination. Result of tension test of the roll cast and cold rolled strip was as same as that of D.C. cast and rolled strip. Deep drawing test was operated at the conditions both of the roll contact surface and the free solidified surface were outer side. LDR (limited drawing ratio) was same at both conditions and they were 1.8. Thickness of the strip was controlled by the roll speed, solidification length (length of the melt pool) and pressure of the scraper. The single roll caster is simpler than a twin roll caster. Rigidity for rolling was not required for the single roll caster. Cost of the roll is half comparing a twin roll caster. The equipment cost of the single roll caster is more economy than that of the twin roll caster.

Roll Casting of Aluminum Alloy Strip by a Single Roll Caster Equipped with a Scraper

2012 ◽  
Vol 445 ◽  
pp. 307-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Haga ◽  
Kazuya Akitsu ◽  
Shinji Kumai ◽  
Hisaki Watari
Keyword(s):  
Aluminum Alloy ◽  
Contact Surface ◽  
Rolled Strip ◽  
Drawing Ratio ◽  
Cast Strip ◽  
Roll Casting ◽  
Single Side ◽  
Twin Roll Caster ◽  
Deep Drawing Test ◽  
Twin Roll

A single roll caster equipped with a scraper was devised to cast the strip with sound free solidified surface. A property of this single caster is equipment of the scraper. Semisolid metal on the free solidified surface was scribed by a scraper and the surface became flat. Center line segregation did not occur as the strip was solidified from single side. The AA5182 aluminum alloy could be cast at speeds up to 40m/min. Thickness was about 3mm. Pressure of the unit width from the scraper was ranging from 0.1N/mm to 1.0N/mm, and these pressure was enough to make the free solidified surface flat. Roll cast strip could be cold rolled down to 1mm. There was not difference between roll contact surface and the free solidified surface after cold rolling by a visual examination. Result of tension test of the roll cast strip was as same as that of D.C. cast and rolled strip. Deep drawing test was operated at the conditions both of the roll contact surface and the free solidified surface was outside. LDR (limited drawing ratio) was same at both conditions and they were 1.8. Thickness of the strip was controlled by the roll speed, solidification length (length of the melt pool) and pressure of the scraper. The single roll caster is simpler than a twin roll caster. Rigidity for rolling was not needed for the single roll caster. Cost of the roll is half comparing a twin roll caster. The equipment cost of the single roll caster is more economy than that of the twin roll caster.

Casting of Clad Strip by a Twin Roll Caster

2014 ◽  
Vol 794-796 ◽  
pp. 772-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Haga
Keyword(s):  
Aluminum Alloy ◽  
Aluminum Alloys ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Outer Side ◽  
Drawing Ratio ◽  
Casting Aluminum Alloy ◽  
Twin Roll Caster ◽  
Casting Aluminum ◽  
Wrought Aluminum ◽  
Twin Roll

Clad strip consisting of 5182 aluminum alloy and other aluminum alloys could be cast using a twin roll caster equipped with a scraper. This twin roll caster could carry out the strip casting and the bonding of the strips. The equipment, that was developed to prevent the contact between the bonding surface of the strip and oxidizing environment, was adopted. The developed equipment was a scraper. The 5182 strip could be bonded to other aluminum alloy strips by the effect of the scraper. Aluminum alloys for casting has poor formability, especially, bending ability is poor. The clad strip consisting of A356 casting aluminum alloy and 3003 wrought aluminum alloy was cast. 180 degree bending test was carried out on this clad strip. In the condition that the 3003 strip was outer side and A356 strip was inner side, the crack did not occur at the outer 3003 strip. In the deep drawing test or the clad strip, LDR (Limiting Drawing Ratio) was 1.8. These results mean that the casting aluminum alloy has ability to be used for the sheet forming, if the casting aluminum alloy is cladded with the wrought aluminum alloy.

Strip Casting of 6061 and Recycled 6061 Alloy by an Unequal Diameter Twin Roll Caster

2011 ◽  
Vol 264-265 ◽  
pp. 1911-1916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Haga ◽  
Hideki Inui ◽  
Ryoji Nakamura ◽  
Shinji Kumai ◽  
Hisaki Watari
Keyword(s):  
Aluminium Alloy ◽  
Surface Condition ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Cast Strip ◽  
Fe Content ◽  
Strip Cast ◽  
Cold Rolled ◽  
Twin Roll Caster ◽  
6061 Aluminium Alloy ◽  
Twin Roll

A 6061 aluminium alloy and an alloy with increased Fe content, representing recycled 6061 aluminium alloy were cast into strips at speed of 30m/min by an unequal diameter twin roll caster. The Fe content of 6061 aluminium alloy and the model of recycled 6061 aluminium alloy was 0.36 mass% and 0.59 mass%, respectively. Ripple marks, which are typical surface defect of roll cast strips, did not occur on the surface of both as-cast strips. Fe content did not influence the surface condition of the roll-cast-strip. The as-cast strip was cold rolled down to 1 mm, T4 heat treatment was conducted, and then subjected to180 degrees bending test. The result of 180 degrees bending test shows that roll cast 6061 aluminium alloy and 6061 aluminium alloy with increased Fe as recycled had bending ability as same as that of roll-cast 6022 aluminium alloy. In the strip cast by the twin roll caster of the present study, increased Fe content did not influence on the result of the180 degrees bending test.

Roll Casting of Recycled AA5182

2011 ◽  
Vol 121-126 ◽  
pp. 4667-4670
Author(s):  
Toshio Haga ◽  
Kosuke Komeda ◽  
Kenta Mtsuoka ◽  
Shinji Kumai ◽  
Hisaki Watari
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Aluminum Alloy ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Model Alloy ◽  
Drawing Ratio ◽  
Roll Speed ◽  
Roll Casting ◽  
Twin Roll Caster ◽  
Twin Roll ◽  
Fe Addition

Roll casting of the model alloy of recycled AA5182 aluminum alloy was investigated. Fe up to 0.6% was added to the AA5182 to make the model alloys of recycled AA5182. Increase of 0.6% of Fe means that the recycle was three times operated. A vertical type high speed twin roll caster was used. Some devices were operated on the twin roll caster to increase the cooling rate in order to make impurity fine. The roll speed could be increased up to 80m/min. The roll-castability did not become worse by the addition of the Fe. The LDR (limiting Drawing Ratio) was 1.9 when the Fe addition was 0.6. The deterioration of the mechanical properties by the addition of impurity Fe was very small.

Formability of Roll Cast Recycled Aluminum Alloy

2007 ◽  
Vol 340-341 ◽  
pp. 605-610
Author(s):  
Ryoji Nakamura ◽  
Masaki Ikawa ◽  
Shinji Kumai ◽  
Hisaki Watari
Keyword(s):  
Aluminum Alloy ◽  
Outer Surface ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Tension Test ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Heat Treated ◽  
6016 Aluminum Alloy ◽  
Twin Roll Caster ◽  
Twin Roll ◽  
Fe Impurity

Fe was added to 6016 aluminum alloy as the impurity, and this alloy was used as the model of the recycled 6016 aluminum alloy. The content of the Fe was from 0.18 mass% up to 1.0 mass%. 6016 including impurity-Fe was cast into the strip using a high speed twin roll caster at speed of 60 m/min. The increase of the content of impurity-Fe makes castability better rather than worse. The formability was investigated by tension test and 180 degrees bending test. The increase of Fe did not have influence on the bending test. There was no crack at outer surface of T4-heat treated strip after 180 degrees bending. The formability of 6016 strip including impurity-Fe cast by the high speed twin roll caster was enough for hem forming. The ductility of Fe added 6016 was improved by the high speed twin roll caster. It is thought that Al-Si-Fe impurity became fine by the effect of the rapid solidification, and deterioration could be improved.

Inline Rolling of 5182 Aluminum Alloy Strip Cast by a Vertical Type High Speed Twin Roll Caster

2010 ◽  
Vol 139-141 ◽  
pp. 477-480
Author(s):  
Ryoji Nakamura ◽  
Shuya Hanada ◽  
Shinji Kumai ◽  
Hisaki Watari
Keyword(s):  
Aluminum Alloy ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Rolling Speed ◽  
Center Line ◽  
Alloy Strip ◽  
Ripple Mark ◽  
Roll Casting ◽  
Strip Cast ◽  
Twin Roll Caster ◽  
Twin Roll

An inline hot rolling was operated on 5182 aluminum alloy strip cast using a vertical type high speed caster (VHSTRC) at the speed of 60 m/min. A porosity existing at center line of the thickness and a ripple mark on the surface, these are typical defects of the strip cast by the VHSTRC, could be improved by the inline rolling. The rolling speed was as same as the roll-casting-speed of 60m/min. The temperature of the strip, when the inline rolling was operated, was 450oC. The reduction of the strip of the inline rolling was 35%.

Cazacu and Barlat Criterion Identification Using the Cylindrical Cup Deep Drawing Test and the Coupled Artificial Neural Networks – Genetic Algorithm Method

2012 ◽  
Vol 504-506 ◽  
pp. 637-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamdi Aguir ◽  
J.L. Alves ◽  
M.C. Oliveira ◽  
L.F. Menezes ◽  
Hedi BelHadjSalah
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithm ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Deep Drawing ◽  
Inverse Analysis ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Ann Model ◽  
Drawing Test ◽  
Artificial Neural ◽  
Deep Drawing Test ◽  
Cylindrical Cup

This paper deals with the identification of the anisotropic parameters using an inverse strategy. In the classical inverse methods, the inverse analysis is generally coupled with a finite element code, which leads to a long computational time. In this work an inverse analysis strategy coupled with an artificial neural network (ANN) model is proposed. This method has the advantage of being faster than the classical one. To test and validate the proposed approach an experimental cylindrical cup deep drawing test is used in order to identify the orthotropic material behaviour. The ANN model is trained by finite element simulations of this experimental test. To reduce the gap between the experimental responses and the numerical ones, the proposed method is coupled with an optimization procedure based on the genetic algorithm (GA) to identify the Cazacu and Barlat’2001 material parameters of a standard mild steel DC06.

Evaluation of stamping lubricants using the deep drawing test

2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 2120-2132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunok Kim ◽  
Ji Hyun Sung ◽  
Rajesh Sivakumar ◽  
Taylan Altan
Keyword(s):  
Deep Drawing ◽  
Drawing Test ◽  
Deep Drawing Test
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document