Making It Meaningful: Finding Quality Improvement Projects Worthy of Your Time, Effort, and Expertise

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M. Stausmire ◽  
Charla Ulrich
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Physical Environment ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Critical Care Units ◽  
Part Quality

This article is the second of a 4-part quality improvement resource series for critical care nurses interested in implementing system process or performance improvement projects. The article is a brainstorming session on paper, written to assist nurses and managers in identifying possible quality improvement projects that are meaningful to them and will make a real difference in their critical care units. Every unit and institution has its own unique mix of resources, culture, physical environment, patient population, technology, documentation processes, health care providers, and multiple other factors. Thus specific patient care and safety challenges must be identified and prioritized individually for quality improvement by each unit. Projects also must be manageable and within the scope of time, effort, and expertise available—no quality improvement project is “too small” if it is applicable to your critical care area and will improve outcomes.

Using SQUIRE 2.0 as a Guide for Planning Your Quality Improvement Project

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 72-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M. Stausmire ◽  
Charla Ulrich
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Performance Improvement ◽  
Critical Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Time Constraints ◽  
Real Difference ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Part Quality ◽  
The Third

This article is the third of a 4-part quality improvement resource series for critical care nurses interested in implementing system process or performance improvement projects. Part 1 defined the differences between research and quality improvement. Part 2 discussed how nurses and managers could identify meaningful quality improvement projects that will make a real difference in their critical care unit while fitting within their time constraints and resources. Part 3 uses the recently revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guidelines as a basis for designing, implementing, documenting, and publishing quality improvement projects.

scholarly journals Family Behaviors as Unchanging Obstacles in End-of-Life Care: 16-Year Comparative Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. e81-e91
Author(s):  
Renea L. Beckstrand ◽  
Jasmine B. Jenkins ◽  
Karlen E. Luthy ◽  
Janelle L. B. Macintosh
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Over Time

Background Critical care nurses routinely care for dying patients. Research on obstacles in providing end-of-life care has been conducted for more than 20 years, but change in such obstacles over time has not been examined. Objective To determine whether the magnitude scores of obstacles and helpful behaviors regarding end-of-life care have changed over time. Methods In this cross-sectional survey study, questionnaires were sent to 2000 randomly selected members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Obstacle and helpful behavior items were analyzed using mean magnitude scores. Current data were compared with data gathered in 1999. Results Of the 2000 questionnaires mailed, 509 usable responses were received. Six obstacle magnitude scores increased significantly over time, of which 4 were related to family issues (not accepting the poor prognosis, intrafamily fighting, overriding the patient’s end-of-life wishes, and not understanding the meaning of the term lifesaving measures). Two were related to nurse issues. Seven obstacles decreased in magnitude, including poor design of units, overly restrictive visiting hours, and physicians avoiding conversations with families. Four helpful behavior magnitude scores increased significantly over time, including physician agreement on patient care and family access to the patient. Three helpful behavior items decreased in magnitude, including intensive care unit design. Conclusions The same end-of-life care obstacles that were reported in 1999 are still present. Obstacles related to family behaviors increased significantly, whereas obstacles related to intensive care unit environment or physician behaviors decreased significantly. These results indicate a need for better end-of-life education for families and health care providers.

A Novel ICU Hand-Over Tool: The Glass Door of the Patient Room

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 514-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T. Wessman ◽  
Carrie Sona ◽  
Marilyn Schallom
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Night Shift ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Glass Door ◽  
Patient Handover ◽  
Communication Errors

Background: Poor communication among health-care providers is cited as the most common cause of sentinel events involving patients. Patient care in the critical care setting is incredibly complex. A consistent care plan is necessary between day/night shift teams and among bedside intensive care unit (ICU) nurses, consultants, and physicians. Our goal was to create a novel, easily accessible communication device to improve ICU patient care. Methods: This communication improvement project was done at an academic tertiary surgical/trauma/mixed 36-bed ICU with an average of 214 admissions per month. We created a glass door template embossed on the glass that included 3 columns for daily goals to be written: “day team,” “night team,” and “surgery/consultant team.” Assigned areas for tracking “lines,” “antibiotics,” “ventilator weaning,” and “Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) screening” were included. These doors are filled out/updated throughout the day by all of the ICU providers. All services can review current plans/active issues while evaluating the patient at the bedside. Patient-identifying data are not included. We retrospectively reviewed all ICU safety reported events over a 4-year period (2 years prior/2 years after glass door implementation) for specific handover communication-related errors and compared the 2 cohorts. Results: Information on the glass doors is entered daily on rounds by all services. Prior to implementation, 7.96% of reported errors were related to patient handover communication errors. The post glass-door era had 4.26% of reported errors related to patient handover communication errors with a relative risk reduction of 46.5%. Due to its usefulness, this method of communication was quickly adopted by the other critical care services (cardiothoracic, medical, neurology/neurosurgery, cardiology) at our institution and is now used for over 150 ICU beds. Conclusions: Our glass door patient handover tool is an easily adaptable intervention that has improved communication leading to an overall decrease in the number of handover communication errors.

Improving Health Care Provider Communication in End-of-Life Decision-Making

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey Wilson ◽  
Cathy Haut ◽  
Bimbola Akintade
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Daunting Task ◽  
End Of Life Decision ◽  
Life Decision

Critical care providers are responsible for many aspects of patient care, primarily focusing on preserving life. However, nearly 40% of patients who are admitted to an adult critical care unit will not survive. Initiating a conversation about end-of-life decision-making is a daunting task. Often, health care providers are not trained, experienced, or comfortable facilitating these conversations. This article describes a quality improvement project that identified current views on end-of-life communication in the intensive care unit and potential barriers that obstruct open discussion, and offering strategies for improvement.

Pain Management in the Critically Ill: What Do We Know and How Can We Improve?

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele A. Alpen ◽  
Marita G. Titler
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Critical Care Units ◽  
Knowledge And Attitudes ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

Pain management in the critically ill is a challenge and a problem of great concern for critical care nurses. The authors review research on pain in the areas of pain assessment, nurses’ knowledge and attitudes, pharmacologic interventions, and nonpharmacologic interventions for the management of pain. Although the research base is not completely developed in the critically ill population, implications for practice are provided, based upon the findings in populations akin to the critically ill. Strategies are outlined for achieving improved pain control in critical care units through education, adoption of standards on pain management, and quality improvement activities

Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: A Primer for Critical Care Nurses

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 36-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Sacco ◽  
Thomas W. Barkley
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Genetic Disease ◽  
Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia ◽  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Abnormal Growth

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia is a rare, autosomal dominant genetic disease that causes abnormal growth of blood vessels and, subsequently, life-threatening arteriovenous malformations in vital organs. Epistaxis may be one of the initial clues that a patient has more serious, generalized arteriovenous malformations. Recommended treatment involves careful evaluation to determine the severity and risk of spontaneous rupture of the malformations and the management of various signs and symptoms. The disease remains undiagnosed in many patients, and health care providers may miss the diagnosis until catastrophic events happen in multiple family members. Prompt recognition of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and early intervention can halt the dangerous course of the disease. Critical care nurses can assist with early diagnosis within families with this genetic disease, thus preventing early death and disability.

Seeing the Patient and Family Through: Nurses and Physicians Experiences With Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in the ICU

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra L. Wiegand ◽  
Jooyoung Cheon ◽  
Giora Netzer
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Phenomenological Approach ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Therapy Decision ◽  
Nurses And Physicians

Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy at the end of life is a complex phenomenon. Intensive care nurses and physicians are faced with caring for patients and supporting families, as these difficult decisions are made. The purpose of this study was to explore and describe the experience of critical care nurses and physicians participating in the process of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. A hermeneutic phenomenological approach was used to guide this qualitative investigation. Interviews were conducted with critical care nurses and physicians from 2 medical centers. An inductive approach to data analysis was used to understand similarities between the nurses and the physicians’ experiences. Methodological rigor was established, and data saturation was achieved. The main categories that were inductively derived from the data analysis included from novice to expert, ensuring ethical care, uncertainty to certainty, facilitating the process, and preparing and supporting families. The categories aided in understanding the experiences of nurses and physicians, as they worked individually and together to see patients and families through the entire illness experience, withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy decision-making process and dying process. Understanding the perspectives of health-care providers involved in the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy process will help other health-care providers who are striving to provide quality care to the dying and to their families.

scholarly journals Improving documentation of side-effects discussions by doctors for newly initiated psychotropic medications in outpatient clinics: A single-centre quality-improvement project

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-182
Author(s):  
Balasundaram Bharathi ◽  
Phua June ◽  
Tan Lay Ling ◽  
Peh Lai Huat ◽  
Selvaraj Ashvini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Outpatient Clinics ◽  
Medical Council ◽  
Clinical Documentation ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Ethical Guidelines ◽  
Improvement Project

Background: Robust clinical documentation of side-effects communication is an integral component of good patient care, endorsed by the Singapore Medical Council Ethical Code and Ethical Guidelines and further highlighted by the Modified Montgomery Test. In addition to ensuring quality of care, good clinical documentation can help mitigate potential medico-legal risks against doctors and health-care providers. Objectives: This audit-cum-quality-improvement project aimed to enhance clinical documentation of side-effects discussion of newly prescribed medication in psychiatry outpatient clinics to 100% in a 12-month period. Methods: A baseline measurement revealed that 40% of new cases seen in general and geriatric psychiatry outpatient clinics from March to June 2017 had evidenced clinical documentation of at least one or more side effects. PDSA methodology was employed to bring about improvements and test change interventions. Results: Through three audit cycles between January and December 2018 and a fourth round of data collection in April 2019, documentation rates showed marked improvement from a baseline of 40% to 91%. The IT document tool was the most effective intervention which was successfully adopted and implemented into the standard documentation template for new case assessments. Conclusions: The project was a success overall, with improvements in documentation rates rising to 91%. Through change interventions, systemic factors rooted in patient safety have been embodied in everyday clinical practice.

EP.TU.653Improving surgical admission clerking by introducing a standardized clerking proforma: a quality improvement project

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Geropoulos ◽  
Clio Kennedy ◽  
Stanley Tang ◽  
Ahmed Elhamshary ◽  
Sara Rakhshani-Moghadam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Surgical Patient ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Operative Care ◽  
Detailed Medical History ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Aims When clerking new admissions several critical actions must be performed in a timely and accurate way. These include reviewing referral letters, obtaining a detailed medical history and documenting the patient’s plan. This is of paramount importance, especially in high volume surgical hospitals. The aim of this quality improvement project is to evaluate a standardized electronic proforma for surgical patient clerking in an attempt to minimize missing information that can compromise peri-operative care. Methods A short questionnaire assessing the clerking process was handed out to doctors and allied health professionals. It was completed before and after the introduction of the clerking proforma. Proportion confidence intervals (95% CI) compared for each answer before and after the proforma releasing. Results Domains with a statistically significant improvement were the admission reason, management, treatment escalation and venous thromboprophylaxis plan in patients on long term anticoagulation. After introduction of the proforma, feedback still implied that the social history needed to be more extensive. Further edits to the proforma in a second cycle include prompts regarding baseline function and ADLs, as well as existing packages of care. Conclusions Overall, the introduction of the surgical patient clerking proforma lead to an improvement of the quality of the clerking as assessed by standardized questionnaires. It is noteworthy that a complete clerking is correlated with more effective handover between health care providers, less medical errors, less treatment delays and improved patient outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document