scholarly journals Topiramate: use in binge eating disorder?

2012 ◽  
pp. 282-287
Author(s):  
Mauro Gentile ◽  
Giovanni Scanelli

Introduction: Topiramate was serendipitously synthesized in 1979 during research aimed at developing a fructose-1,6-diphosphatase inhibitor that might be used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Some investigators have suggested it might be used in the treatment of binge eating disorder (BED). The aim of this review was to evaluate current knowledge and opinions on this topic. Materials and methods: We conducted a search of five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Nice, Cochrane, Cinahl) using the search strategy ‘‘topiramate’’ AND ‘‘binge’’, ‘‘binge eating disorder.’’ No time limits were applied, and only reports of randomized controlled trials were included in our analysis. Results: In clinical studies, topiramate use has been associated with significant weight loss mediated by reductions in the frequency of bingeing episodes. The most common side effects of the drug are paresthesias, but nephrolithiasis, oligohydrosis, and dizziness have also been described. Conclusions: Available data are limited, but the literature we reviewed suggests that topiramate can be useful in the medical treatment of BED, reducing both body weight and binge episodes. Side effects are not negligible. Before topiramate can be regarded as a good tool for the treatment of BED, further data must be obtained from longer, methodologically correct studies of larger populations.

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz H TESS ◽  
Letícia MAXIMIANO-FERREIRA ◽  
Denis PAJECKI ◽  
Yuan-Pang WANG

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Eating pathologies among bariatric surgery candidates are common and associated with adverse surgical outcomes, including weight regain and low quality of life. However, their assessment is made difficult by the great variety and inconsistent use of standardized measures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to synthesize current knowledge on the prevalence of binge eating disorder (BED) in presurgical patients and to make a critical appraisal of assessment tools for BED. METHODS: A search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 1994 to March 2017. Data were extracted, tabulated and summarized using a narrative approach. RESULTS: A total of 21 observational studies were reviewed for data extraction and analysis. Prevalence of BED in bariatric populations ranged from 2% to 53%. Considerable variation in patient characteristics and in BED assessment measures was evident among the studies. In addition, several methodological weaknesses were recognized in most of the studies. Ten different psychometric instruments were used to assess BED. Clinical interviews were used in only 12 studies, though this is the preferred tool to diagnose BED. CONCLUSION: Study heterogeneity accounted for the variability of the results from different centers and methodological flaws such as insufficient sample size and selection bias impaired the evidence on the magnitude of BED in surgical settings. For the sake of comparability and generalizability of the findings in future studies, researchers must recruit representative samples of treatment-seeking candidates for bariatric surgery and systematically apply standard instruments for the assessment of BED.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie E. Cassin ◽  
Kristin M. von Ranson ◽  
Kenneth Heng ◽  
Joti Brar ◽  
Amy E. Wojtowicz

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 520-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Brockmeyer ◽  
Hans‐Christoph Friederich ◽  
Carolyn Küppers ◽  
Sharmain Chowdhury ◽  
Louisa Harms ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document