The Effect of Screening Tests for Predicting Difficult Intubation and the Duration of Anesthesia Resident Training for Dental Trauma Associated with General Anesthesia

2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 289
Author(s):  
Cheol Lee ◽  
Seri O
Author(s):  
Annette Rebel ◽  
Kevin W. Hatton ◽  
Paul A. Sloan ◽  
Christopher T. Hayes ◽  
Sean C. Sardam ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 1703-1703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen B. Domino ◽  
Karen L. Posner ◽  
Robert A. Caplan ◽  
Frederick W. Cheney

Background Airway injury during general anesthesia is a significant source of morbidity for patients and a source of liability for anesthesiologists. To identify recurrent patterns of injury, the authors analyzed claims for airway injury in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Closed Claims Project database. Methods The ASA Closed Claims database is a standardized collection of case summaries derived from professional liability insurance companies closed claims files. All claims for airway injury were reviewed in depth and were compared to other claims during general anesthesia. Results Approximately 6% (266) of 4,460 claims in the database were for airway injury. The most frequent sites of injury were the larynx (33%), pharynx (19%), and esophagus (18%). Injuries to the esophagus and trachea were more frequently associated with difficult intubation. Injuries to temporomandibular joint and the larynx were more frequently associated with nondifficult intubation. Injuries to the esophagus were more severe and resulted in a higher payment to the plaintiff than claims for other sites of airway injury. Difficult intubation (odds ratio = 4.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.36, 8.71), age older than 60 yr (odds ratio = 2.97, 95% CI = 1.51, 5.87), and female gender (odds ratio = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.09, 5.42) were associated with claims for pharyngoesophageal perforation. Early signs of perforation, e.g., pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema, were present in only 51% of perforation claims, whereas late sequelae, e.g., retropharyngeal abscess and mediastinitis, occurred in 65%. Conclusion Patients in whom tracheal intubation has been difficult should be observed for and told to watch for the development of symptoms and signs of retropharyngeal abscess, mediastinitis, or both.


2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinao Asahi ◽  
Ryosuke Fujii ◽  
Naoko Usui ◽  
Hajime Kagamiuchi ◽  
Shiro Omichi ◽  
...  

Abstract Disabled patients may face respiratory problems during general anesthesia because of head and neck anomalies. We describe a case of dental treatment under general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway in a disabled patient who faced difficulty in endotracheal intubation on several occasions, 5 of which resulted in dental injuries.


2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (207) ◽  
pp. 314-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sindhu Khatiwada ◽  
Balkrishna Bhattarai ◽  
Krishna Pokharel ◽  
Roshan Acharya

Introduction: Unanticipated difficult intubation is an undesirable situation. Various bedside screening tests are routinely performed for predicting difficult airway. Although considered a surrogate indicator, difficult laryngoscopy is not the exact measure of intubation difficulty. We aimed to determine the best screening test for predicting difficult laryngoscopy and the association between difficult laryngoscopic view and difficult intubation. Methods: This prospective, observational study involved 314, ASA I/II adult patients requiring endotracheal intubation for various routine surgical procedures. Sternomental distance < 12 cm, thyromental distance < 6.5cm, inter-incisor distance < 3.5 cm, mandibular protrusion grade 3 and modified Mallampati class III/IV were the predictors of difficult laryngoscopy. Laryngoscopic view was defined as ‘difficult’ when the Cormack and Lehane grade was III/ IV. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of these predictors were compared to find out the best predictor. Requirement of >3 attempts for insertion of the tracheal tube was defined as ‘difficult intubation’. The association between difficult laryngoscopic view and difficult intubation was determined. Results: The sensitivity of the modified Mallampati class for predicting difficult laryngoscopy was highest (83%). Twelve (3.8%) patients had grade III laryngoscopic view and none had a grade of IV. Intubation was difficult in seven (2.2%) patients. Majority of patients (4 of 7) with difficult intubation had difficult laryngoscopic view (p<0.001). Conclusions: Modified Mallampati test was better for predicting difficult laryngoscopy compared to other bedside screeing tests. Difficult laryngoscopy could significantly predict difficult intubation in our patients.   Keywords: Airway evaluation; difficult intubation; difficult laryngoscopy; modified Mallampati class; Nepalese patients; sensitivity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Doddy Setiawan ◽  
Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi ◽  
I Gede Budiarta ◽  
I Gusti Ngurah Mahaalit Aribawa

Patients with difficult airways who are going to undergo surgery under general anesthesia require special consideration from an anesthesiologist. Knowing the most significant risk of morbidity and mortality is often due to difficult cases of airway management. One of the most common complications and often becomes lawsuits in the field of anesthesia is dental trauma that occurs during the intubation process due to contact from laryngoscope blade to the teeth. This descriptive study will show the measured force exerted on the maxillary incisors at the time of performing laryngoscopy using a McGrath video laryngoscope in patients with a potentially difficult intubation (LEMON criteria ≥ 3). The contact force exerted on the maxillary incisors is measured using a special instrument. The contact force exerted on the maxillary incisors in patients with a potentially problematic airway was discovered to vary.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Shristi Shah

Background: Prevalence of difficult intubation is estimated as 3 -18% during routine anesthesia. There are various bedside tests to predict the difficult intubation, like Mallampati test, Thyromental distance, Sternomental distance and mouth opening. However, the prevalence and prediction in Nepalese population is still not estimated. So this study is to see the prevalence and to compare the efficacy of airway parameters to predict the difficult intubation in Nepalese population.Methods: A prospective study was done to estimate the prevalence and prediction of difficult intubation in Nepalese population. During six months period, 182 patients who were undergoing routine surgery under General anesthesia were included in the study. Mallampati grading, thyromental distance, mouth opening and sternomental distance were recorded in preoperative assessment. Cormack and Lehane grading were done during intubation and Grade I and II are considered as easy intubation/ laryngoscopy and III and IV are considered as difficult intubation.Results: The prevalence of difficult intubation was 4.9%. Sensitivity of different tests were as follows; Mallampati test – 55%, thyromental distance – 33%, mouth opening – 22% and sternomental distance – 11%. The Specificity of the test as Mallampati test – 98%, thyromental distance – 89%, mouth opening – 96% and sternomental distance – 97%. So the Mallampati test is more sensitive and specific among the tests done.Conclusion: This prospective study shows that the prevalence of difficult intubation is not different in Nepalese population and the bedside predictors also are good tests that could be continued in our population.Journal of Society of Anesthesiologists of Nepal 2015; 2(1): 17-20


1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 382-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Bilgin ◽  
G. Özyurt

Three methods of predicting difficult intubation were compared prospectively. Mallampati test, Wilson risk-sum and thyromental distance were determined preoperatively and laryngeal views were graded in 500 patients. The sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values of each test were calculated. The incidence of difficult intubation was found to be 8%. The sensitivities of the Mallampati test, the Wilson risk-sum and the thyromental distance were 43%, 58% and 35% respectively, and the specificities were 93%, 91% and 95% respectively. Significant differences were seen between the sensitivities of the Mallampati test and the Wilson risk-sum (P<0.001), the Wilson risk-sum and the thyromental distance (P<0.001), the Mallampati test and the thyromental distance (P<0.05). Among the different specificities, the only significant difference was observed between the Wilson risk-sum and the thyromental distance (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the positive and negative predictive values of the three screening tests (P>0.05). In conclusion, the Wilson risk-sum was the most sensitive test and the thyromental distance has the highest positive predictive value for difficult intubation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document