scholarly journals Performance of free prostate-specific antigen ratio in differentiating between prostatic cancer and benign prostatic lesions at a referral hospital in South Africa

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Boitumelo Phiri-Ramongane ◽  
Ayeaye Khine
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Male Population ◽  
Free Psa ◽  
Total Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Good Discriminator ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Current Screening

Background: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in our male population, thus screening initiatives will help to improve outcomes. The current screening marker, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), is not prostate cancer specific. The development of percentage free PSA (%FPSA) has largely improved the detection of prostate cancer.Objectives: To assess the performance of %FPSA ratio at the 25% cut-off and its ability to distinguish between prostate cancer and benign prostatic lesions.Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted on male patients with total prostate-specific antigen values 10 ng/ml and with prostate histology results. Male patients with total prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/ml had their free prostate-specific antigen determined together with the calculation of the free prostate-specific antigen ratio. The ratio was then correlated with prostate histology results to determine the presence of prostate cancer at the cut-off ratio of 25%.Results: Prostate cancer was detected in 28 (21.37%) patients out of the total population of 131. Ninety-two patients had a FPSA ratio of 25%, 22 (22.8%) of whom were found to have prostate cancer. Notably the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 86% and 27% respectively, with a positive predictive of value of 21% at this cut-off.Conclusions: The study demonstrates a %FPSA ratio of 25% not to be a good discriminator between prostatic cancerous and benign lesions. It is thus recommended that a prostate biopsy should be done based on clinical examination findings rather than the level of total prostate specific antigen from 0–10 ng/ml or %FPSA ratio.

20–25% Lower Concentrations of Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) after Calibration of PSA Assays to the WHO Reference Materials – Analysis of 1098 Patients in Four Centers

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Stephan ◽  
Chris Bangma ◽  
Giulio Vignati ◽  
Georg Bartsch ◽  
Michael Lein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
World Health ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Misleading Information ◽  
Free Psa ◽  
Total Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Independent Cohort

Aim To examine the potential clinical implications of the recalibration of total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free PSA (fPSA) assays to the World Health Organization (WHO) standard materials. Material and methods Data from 1098 patients with or without clinically detected prostate cancer (PCa) from four independent cohort studies were compared using commercial assays calibrated to the traditional Hybritech® PSA (PSA-Hyb) and fPSA (fPSA-Hyb) standards and to the WHO 96/670 (PSA-WHO) and 96/668 (fPSA-WHO) standards. The Access® Immunoassay System (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) was used in all studies. Results All studies showed 20% to 25% lower PSA and fPSA test results with the WHO-standardized assays. No significant change in %fPSA (fPSA/PSA × 100) was observed. Continuing to use the traditional clinical PSA cutoffs obtained with the Hybritech standard after changing to the PSA-WHO standard could result in up to one-third of prostate cancer cases being missed. Conclusions: Manufacturers should fully inform laboratories about a calibration change and its clinical impact. Laboratory reports for PSA measurements should indicate the assay's manufacturer and which calibration standard was used to avoid misleading information concerning PCa risk

scholarly journals CAN PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY AND FREE / TOTAL PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RATIO PREDICT CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER (GLEASON ≥ 7) IN PATİENTS DIAGNOSED PROSTATE CANCER ON BIOPSY WITH A PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVEL OF 2.5 -10 NG/ML?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Bicaklioglu ◽  
Hasan Aydin ◽  
Ahmet Özgür Güçtaş ◽  
Hamit Zafer Aksoy
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Free Psa ◽  
Total Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen Density ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Total Psa

Introduction Many men with non-clinically significant PCa (N-CSPCa) will not progress to become symptomatic within their lifetime. If we can predict clinically significant PCa (CSPCa), we can prevent patients from unnecessary biopsies, overdiagnoses, and overtreatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether PSAD and f/t PSA can predict CSPCa (Gleason ≥ 7) in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer on biopsy with a PSA level of 2.5-10 ng/ml or not. Materials and Methods 78 patients who underwent TRUSG-guided prostate biopsy with PSA 2.5-10.0 in our clinic between March 2017 - August 2020 and whose pathology result was reported as prostate adenocarcinoma, were retrospectively evaluated. In addition to the demographic content of the patients, PSA, free PSA, prostate size (with TRUSG), rectal examination findings and prostate biopsy pathology results were recorded. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as a Gleason score 7. Results The mean age of the patients was 66.9 ± 8.4, PSA value was 6.9 ± 1.8, free / total PSA ratio was 18 ± 8.1%, and PSA density was 0.150 ± 0.078. The P values of PSA, free PSA, PSAD, f/t PSA, and prostate volume between CSPCa and N- CSPCa groups were 0.010, 0.780, 0.001, 0.084, and 0.030, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the PSAD for predicting CSPCa was 0.719 with a 95% Cl (0.604–0.835), and the standard errors were 0.062 and 0.059, respectively. When PSAD cutoff was 0.130 for predicting CSPCa, sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 63%, respectively. Conclusion PSAD can be used for predicting CSPCa, but f/t PSA can not. PSAD is not a strong stand-alone tool with its sensitivity and specificity, but we suggest that PSAD can be a part of future nomograms for predicting CSPCa and future protocols for active surveillance. Key words:prostate-specific antigen; clinically significant prostate cancer

Cumulative Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment with the Aid of the Free-to-Total Prostate Specific Antigen Ratio

2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Aus ◽  
Charlotte Becker ◽  
Stefan Franzén ◽  
Hans Lilja ◽  
Pär Lodding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk Assessment ◽  
Total Prostate Specific Antigen
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document