Iatrogenic bile duct injury: A retrospective analysis of short- and long-term outcomes after surgical repair

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
AmrMostafa Aziz ◽  
Hany Shoreem ◽  
Ahmed Sallam ◽  
Mohamed Al-warraky ◽  
Amr Sadek ◽  
...  
HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S559
Author(s):  
A.M. Schreuder ◽  
K.A. Booij ◽  
P.R. de Reuver ◽  
E. Roos ◽  
M.G. Besselink ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S963
Author(s):  
A.M. Schreuder ◽  
K.A. Booij ◽  
P.R. de Reuver ◽  
E. Roos ◽  
M.G. Besselink ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 037-043
Author(s):  
Vinoth M. ◽  
Abhijit Joshi

Abstract​ Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide. Iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI) is a serious complication of LC and has an incidence of 0.3 to 0.7%. Since it is associated with a significant and potentially lifelong morbidity as well as mortality, diagnosing IBDI as early as possible is of paramount importance. Management of bile duct injuries and prognosis of their surgical repair depend on the timing of its recognition, type and the extent of the injury. In this paper, we present a case of IBDI and attempt to discuss all its dimensions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Bobkiewicz ◽  
łukasz Krokowicz ◽  
Tomasz Banasiewicz ◽  
Tomasz Kościński ◽  
Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki ◽  
...  

AbstractIatrogenic bile duct injuries (BDI) are still a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic problem. With the introduction of the laparoscopic technique for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis, the incidence of iatrogenic BDI increased.was a retrospective analysis of 69 patients treated at the department due to iatrogenic BDI in the years 2004-2014.. In this paper, we presented the results of a retrospective analysis of 69 patients treated at the Department due to iatrogenic BDI in the years 2004-2014. The data were analysed in terms of age, sex, type of biliary injury, clinical symptoms, the type of repair surgery, the time between the primary surgery and the BDI management, postoperative complications and duration of hospital stay.. 82.6% of BDI occurred during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 8.7% occurred during open cholecystectomy, whereas 6 cases of BDI resulted from surgeries conducted for other indications. In order to assess the degree of BDI, Bismuth and Neuhaus classifications were used (for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy respectively). 84.1% of patients with confirmed BDI, were transferred to the Department from other hospitals. The average time between the primary surgery and reoperation was 6.2 days (SD 4). The most common clinical symptom was biliary fistula observed in 78.3% of patients. In 28 patients, unsuccessful attempts to manage BDI were made prior to the admission to the Department in other centres. The repair procedure was mainly conducted by laparotomy (82.6%) and by the endoscopic approach (15.9%). Hepaticojejunostomy was the most common type of reconstruction following BDI (34.7%).. The increase in the rate of iatrogenic bile duct injury remains a challenging surgical problem. The management of BDI should be multidisciplinary treatment. Referring patients with both suspected and confirmed iatrogenic BDI to tertiary centres allows more effective treatment to be implemented.


HPB ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S351-S352
Author(s):  
J. Lindemann ◽  
J. Krige ◽  
U. Kotze ◽  
M. Bernon ◽  
S. Burmeister ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 4294-4299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Halbert ◽  
Maria S. Altieri ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Ziqi Meng ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
...  

Endoscopy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (06) ◽  
pp. 577-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Schreuder ◽  
Klaske Booij ◽  
Philip de Reuver ◽  
Otto van Delden ◽  
Krijn van Lienden ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bile duct injury (BDI) remains a daunting complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In patients with complex BDI, a percutaneous-endoscopic rendezvous procedure may be required to establish bile duct continuity. The aim of this study was to assess short- and long-term outcomes of the rendezvous procedure. Methods All consecutive patients with BDI referred to our tertiary referral center between 1995 and 2016 were analyzed. A rendezvous procedure was performed when endoscopic or radiologic intervention failed, and when deemed feasible by a dedicated multidisciplinary team including hepatopancreaticobiliary surgeons, gastrointestinal endoscopists, and interventional radiologists. Classification of BDI, technical success of the rendezvous procedure, procedure-related adverse events, and outcomes were assessed. Results Among a total of 812 patients, rendezvous was performed in 47 (6 %), 31 (66 %) of whom were diagnosed with complete transection of the bile duct (Amsterdam type D/Strasberg type E injury). The primary success rate of rendezvous was 94 % (44 /47 patients). Overall morbidity was 18 % (10 /55 procedures). No life-threatening adverse events or 90-day mortality occurred. After a median follow-up of 40 months (interquartile range 23 – 54 months), rendezvous was the final successful treatment in 26 /47 patients (55 %). In 14 /47 patients (30 %), rendezvous acted as a bridge to surgery, with hepaticojejunostomy being chosen either primarily or secondarily to treat refractory or relapsing stenosis. Conclusions In experienced hands, rendezvous was a safe procedure, with a long-term success rate of 55 %. When endoscopic or transhepatic interventions fail to restore bile duct continuity in patients with BDI, rendezvous should be considered, either as definitive treatment or as a bridge to elective surgery.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 3451-3457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Mattila ◽  
Jussi Luhtala ◽  
Johanna Mrena ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Ilmo Kellokumpu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document