scholarly journals Correlation of dysoxia metabolism markers with trauma scoring systems in multiple trauma patients admitted to the emergency department: A cross-sectional observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
SeyedMojtaba Aghili ◽  
Reza Nikfarjam ◽  
Zahra Khazaeipour ◽  
Alireza Baratloo
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Reihani ◽  
Hossein Pirazghandi ◽  
Ehsan Bolvardi ◽  
Mohsen Ebrahimi ◽  
Elham Pishbin ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahsa Akhavan ◽  
Amir Reza Mesbahi ◽  
Mahsa Mohammadian ◽  
Alireza Shakibafard ◽  
Mahnaz Yadollahi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sepideh Vosooghi Rahbari ◽  
Hamidreza Hosseinpour ◽  
Mohamadreza Karoobi ◽  
Hojat Abolghasemi ◽  
Ali Shahabinezhad ◽  
...  

Abstract background: Trauma is the leading cause of death in people under 40 years of age worldwide. Various studies have been conducted focused on reducing the annual mortality rate due to trauma. One of the most important measures is reducing the time between the incident and the treatment set up, therefore estimation of the severity of trauma and progressing to mortality before further evaluation is justified. Numerous trauma scoring systems have been apllied worldwide as models for predicting mortality of trauma patients in short and long term periods based on clinical and laboratory data. In this study we aim to compare different trauma scoring systems (such as GAP, MGAP, RTS, TRISS) with a relatively new model – Shiraz Trauma Transfusion Score (STTS) – and to discribe the best qualities of these scoring systems for trauma patients in short (less than 24 hours) and long (more than 24 hours) term.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data from hospitalized trauma patients in Rajaei hospital (center B) of Shiraz, Iran from May to November 2016 were collected and analyzed. Collected data consisted of age, sex, hospital admission duration, mechanism of trauma along with clinical data for calculating different trauma scoring systems, were recorded. Results: while RTS and STTS were the best predictors of mortality in trauma patients in the first 24 hours (sensitivity of 100.00%), GAP and MGAP were the best predictors of the patients’ survival (specificity of 93.83% and 92.59%). GAP and ISS were the best predictors of mortality in trauma patients for more than 24 hours (sensitivity of 82.02%). On the other hand, TRIS and RTS was the best predictors of patients' survival (specificity of 82.59% and 80.26%).Conclusion: Our study findings suggest that the utility and applicability of Shiraz Trauma Transfusion Score(STTS) in predicting mortality is not only comparable with other commonly used scoring methods but it may be of more value in short term mortality prediction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document