Construction of Collaborative Governance-based on Social Capital in Disaster Management Studies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abd. Rachim ◽  
Y. Warella ◽  
Retno Astuti ◽  
Suharyanto Suharyanto
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Disaster Management ◽  
Collaborative Governance

scholarly journals Collaborative Governance dan Social Capital : Peran Pemerintah dan Non-Pemerintah dalam Disaster Management di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-50
Author(s):  
Prawira Yudha Pratama ◽  
Nurmandi Achmad
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Disaster Management ◽  
Collaborative Governance

Studi pada penelitian ini terkait dengan kolaborasi antar pemerintah dan lembaga organisasi kemasyarakatan didalam tata kelola kebencanaan serta bagaimana modal sosial yang tumbuh dimasyarakat pasca terjadinya erupsi Merapi. Penelitian ini mengambil kasus tentang Disaster Management Erupsi Gunung Merapi di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Sedangkan untuk metode yang digunakan penelitian ini yaitu kualitatif-deskriptif yang dikumpulkan melalui jurnal, buku, serta dokumen-dokumen penting terkait Disaster Management erupsi Gunung Merapi. Temuan dalam penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pasca terjadinya erupsi tahun 2010 tumbuh komunitas–komunitas sadar bencana. Artinya, ketahanan sosial dalam kesiapsiagaan kebencanaan dalam menghadapi erupsi merapi bisa dilakukan dengan membentuk sebuah komunitas tanggap bencana yang mengorganisirkan kaum pemuda untuk terlibat dalam tanggap bencana. Komunitas yang terbentuk karena asas kemanusian dan kesukarelawanan. Selain itu komunitas ini terbentuk karena adanya kohesi sosial, kepercayaan dan solidaritas. Selain itu, komunitas ini terbentuk  karena adanya kelompok yang aktif dalam membuat jaringan atau basis masa sehingga menimbulkan dampak yang positif yaitu infomasi yang actual kepada masyarakat lokal. pemberdayaan dan tindakan politik juga terlepas dari terbentuknya komunitas tanggap bencana ini seperti dukungan dari pemerintah dan semua stakeholders terkait dalam memberikan pelatihan dan pemberdayaan kepada masyarakat lokal. kolaborasi ini dibutuhkan agar bencana lebih sistematis dan terencana.  

scholarly journals Assessing the influence of social capital on water point sustainability in rural Ethiopia

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 611-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret T. Person ◽  
Maryann G. Delea ◽  
Joshua V. Garn ◽  
Kelly Alexander ◽  
Bekele Abaire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Resource Management ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
Water Resource ◽  
Collaborative Governance ◽  
Survey Tool ◽  
Rural Ethiopia ◽  
Resource Governance ◽  
Water Point ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Despite considerable investment, sustainability of rural water resources remains a critical challenge in Ethiopia. Evidence suggests social capital – the networks, norms, and trust that facilitate cooperative behaviors – influences a community's ability to manage communal water resources. In turn, strong community governance of water resources may lead to sustainable resource management. Existing evidence provides a framework for exploring the relationship between social capital and governance of common-pool resources. However, there is a dearth of quantifiable evidence demonstrating the relationship between social capital, collaborative governance, and, in turn, sustainability of communal water resources. In 32 communities in rural Ethiopia, we employed a validated survey tool, developed by the World Bank, to quantify social capital and explore these relationships. We found associations between governance and several social capital domains: groups and networks, trust and solidarity, and information and communication. All governance indicators were associated with functionality. Identifying domains of social capital that influence governance can inform institutional efforts to target community-based water resource programming, foster social capital to improve water point sustainability, and diagnose issues related to resource management. Additional research examining the influence and directionality of social capital and other social constructs on water resource governance and functionality is warranted.

scholarly journals Kolaborasi Antar Stakeholders Dalam Manajemen Bencana Tanah Longsor Di Kota Semarang

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 854-862
Author(s):  
Aziz Masyhuri ◽  
Hartuti Purnaweni ◽  
Augustin Rina Herawati ◽  
Budi Puspo Priyadi
Keyword(s):  
Disaster Management ◽  
Institutional Design ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Collaborative Governance ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Collaborative Process ◽  
Government Sector ◽  
The Government ◽  
Collaboration Process ◽  
Landslide Disaster

This study aims to analyze the collaboration process between stakeholders in landslide disaster management in Gajahmungkur District, Semarang City. Collaboration between stakeholders aims to build commitment, understanding, and responsibility in increasing the effectiveness of disaster management which is analyzed through the concept of collaborative governance by Ansell & Gash (2007). Based on a descriptive qualitative research approach, this research was conducted in the city of Semarang, precisely in the district of Gajahmungkur Kecamatan. Data collection was carried out by interview and documentation techniques. Data analysis is based on four indicators of collaborative governance including: initial conditions, institutional design, facilitative leadership, to the collaborative process. The results of this study indicate that there are three stakeholders involved in the collaboration, namely local government, community groups, and also the private sector, however, in the process the coordination carried out by the three stakeholders is not effective enough, thus hindering disaster management activities. As a result of this lack of coordination, the landslide disaster in Semarang City has not been handled properly. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the collaborative process carried out in landslide disaster management in Semarang City has not run optimally due to lack of coordination and lack of participation from other stakeholders outside the government sector, causing landslides to still occur frequently.

scholarly journals From Collaborative to Hegemonic Water Resource Governance through Dualism and Jeong: Lessons Learned from the Daegu-Gumi Water Intake Source Conflict in Korea

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Woong Cho ◽  
Kyujin Jung
Keyword(s):  
Water Pollution ◽  
Social Capital ◽  
Water Intake ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Collaborative Governance ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
South Korean ◽  
Resource Governance ◽  
Governance Process ◽  
The City

Recently, water supplies have been insufficient in some areas. In South Korea, using dualism and Jeongish citizenship, we will demonstrate why collaborative governance of the Daegu–Gumi Water Commission has not worked and how it has been mismanaged by its stakeholders. We discuss the conflict between the Daegu Metropolitan City (hereafter referred to as City of Daegu) and the City of Gumi regarding the relocation of the water intake source. In response to many water pollution accidents, the City of Daegu decided to move the water intake source to near the City of Gumi. Due to a conflict between the cities on this issue, the city established a collaborative governance entity, the Daegu–Gumi Water Commission. However, this form of governance was not successful, and eventually, the Daegu–Gumi Water Commission moved from collaborative governance to hegemonic governance. This was due to dualism and Jeongish citizenship with weak membership, participation, experience, and social capital on the local level as South Korean civil societies tend to have insufficient power and experience to fulfill their intentions or negotiate successfully. The Daegu–Gumi Water Commission failed to reach a consensus and to realize a truly collaborative governance process.

Mud and tears: The human face of disaster – A case study of the Queensland floods, January 2011

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 864-872
Author(s):  
Charmine E J Härtel ◽  
Greg M Latemore
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Natural Disaster ◽  
Disaster Management ◽  
Human Face ◽  
Management Planning ◽  
Large Organization ◽  
Human Side ◽  
Disaster Management Planning

Abstract January 2011 visited on Queensland Australia floods of proportions many thought could not have occurred again, following disaster management planning taken after the historic floods of the 1800s and 1974. This paper presents some reflections on this natural disaster, which affected many members of the ANZAM community and left a permanent mark on those directly affected and those who watched as the waters washed away lives, memories and many of the things that give people a sense of place. Amongst tragedy came stories of generosity of human spirit as well as the occasional case of greed and callousness. When all was over, however, there was no doubt about the human side of disaster management. Through two case studies of a family-owned business and a large organization impacted by the flood in Brisbane, we highlight some lessons for disaster management and propose some strategies for building social capital in times of disaster.

Social capital in large-scale environmental collaboration: the case of the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program

Water Policy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 472-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Reed ◽  
Anthony Campbell ◽  
Mike George ◽  
Deniz Leuenberger ◽  
John McCarty
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Water Policy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Collaborative Governance ◽  
Wildlife Habitat ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Platte River ◽  
Implementation Program ◽  
Grassroots Initiatives ◽  
History Of

Environmental collaborative governance arrangements have the potential to build social capital, leading to long-term cooperation among parties with a history of conflict over water use, in particular in irrigation, hydropower production and riverine wildlife habitat. Previous research on social capital in the context of collaborative governance has emphasized small-scale grassroots initiatives where actors hold common membership in civic associations. This study explores a large-scale policy level collaborative arrangement as a case of collective action facilitated by elements of social capital, with a special emphasis on the concept of the institution as social capital. The Platte River Recovery Implementation Program is the basis for initial findings that social capital formation and cooperative implementation of innovative approaches to water policy can occur at both the local action and large-scale policy levels of collaboration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document