Ethical Challenges of Involving People With Severe Mental Disorders in Health Services Research: A Case Study From a Low-Income Country Setting

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maji Hailemariam ◽  
Amy Drahota ◽  
Charlotte Hanlon
Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Hanlon ◽  
Atalay Alem ◽  
Girmay Medhin ◽  
Teshome Shibre ◽  
Dawit A. Ejigu ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya M. Hammoud ◽  
Maha Elnashar ◽  
Huda Abdelrahim ◽  
Amal Khidir ◽  
Heather A.K. Elliott ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 084047042110288
Author(s):  
Shannon L. Sibbald ◽  
Stefan Paciocco ◽  
Meghan Fournie ◽  
Rachelle Van Asseldonk ◽  
Tiffany Scurr

Case study methodology has grown in popularity within Health Services Research (HSR). However, its use and merit as a methodology are frequently criticized due to its flexible approach and inconsistent application. Nevertheless, case study methodology is well suited to HSR because it can track and examine complex relationships, contexts, and systems as they evolve. Applied appropriately, it can help generate information on how multiple forms of knowledge come together to inform decision-making within healthcare contexts. In this article, we aim to demystify case study methodology by outlining its philosophical underpinnings and three foundational approaches. We provide literature-based guidance to decision-makers, policy-makers, and health leaders on how to engage in and critically appraise case study design. We advocate that researchers work in collaboration with health leaders to detail their research process with an aim of strengthening the validity and integrity of case study for its continued and advanced use in HSR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document