Radiation and Gravitational Equations of Motion

1951 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 195-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Infeld ◽  
A. E. Scheidegger

Among the classical field theories, general relativity theory occupies a somewhat peculiar place. Unlike those of most other field theories, the field equations in relativity theory are non-linear. This implies that many facts, well known in linear theories, have no analogues in general relativity theory, and conversely. The equations of motion of the sources of the gravitational field are contained in the field equations, a fact which does not apply for the motion of an electron in the electromagnetic field. Conversely, it is difficult to define the notion of a wave (familiar in electrodynamics) in relativity theory; for, the linear principle of superposition is crucial for the existence of waves (at least in the sense that the notion of a wave is normally used).

1949 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Einstein ◽  
L. Infeld

The gravitational field manifests itself in the motion of bodies. Therefore the problem of determining the motion of such bodies from the field equations alone is of fundamental importance. This problem was solved for the first time some ten years ago and the equations of motion for two particles were then deduced [1]. A more general and simplified version of this problem was given shortly thereafter [2].Mr. Lewison pointed out to us, that from our approximation procedure, it does not follow that the field equations can be solved up to an arbitrarily high approximation. This is indeed true.


1953 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Infeld

The problem of the field equations and the equations of motion in general relativity theory is now sufficiently clarified. The equations of motion can be deduced from pure field equations by treating matter as singularities, [2; 3], or from field equations with the energy momentum tensor [4]. Recently two papers appeared in which the problem of the coordinate system was considered [5; 8]. The two papers are in general agreement as far as the role of the coordinate system is concerned. Yet there are some differences which require clarification.


2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 816-827
Author(s):  
Rami Ahmad El-Nabulsi

We argue that it is possible to obtain higher-derivative Einstein’s field equations by means of an extended complexified backward–forward nonlocal extension of the space–time metric, which depends on space–time vectors. Our approach generalizes the notion of the covariant derivative along tangent vectors of a given manifold, and accordingly many of the differential geometrical operators and symbols used in general relativity. Equations of motion are derived and a nonlocal complexified general relativity theory is formulated. A number of illustrations are proposed and discussed accordingly.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-24
Author(s):  
Mississippi Valenzuela

As gravitation and electromagnetism are closely analogous long-range interactions, and the current formulation of gravitation is given in terms of geometry. Thence emerges a relativistic theory of the field by generalization of the general relativity. The derivation presented shows how naturally we can extend general relativity theory to a non-symmetric field, and that the field-equations are really the generalizations of the gravitational equations. With curvature tensor and the variational principle, we will deduce the field equations and Bianchi's identities. In consecuense, the field equations will find from Bianchi's identities.


This note is intended to give a rough survey of the results obtained in the study of twist-free pure radiation fields in general relativity theory. Here we are using the following Definition. A space-time ( V 4 of signature +2) is called a pure radiation field if it contains a distortion-free geodetic null congruence (a so-called ray congruence ), and if it satisfies certain field equations which we will specify below (e.g. Einstein’s vacuum-field equations). A (null) congruence is called twist-free if it is hypersurface-orthogonal (or ‘normal’). The results listed below were obtained by introducing special (‘canonical’) co-ordinates adapted to the ray congruence. Detailed proofs were given by Robinson & Trautman (1962) and by Jordan, Kundt & Ehlers (1961) (see also Kundt 1961). For the sake of completeness we include in our survey the subclass of expanding fields, and make use of some formulae first obtained by Robinson & Trautman.


2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 687-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Echeverría-Enríquez ◽  
M. C. Muñoz-Lecanda ◽  
N. Román-Roy

We give a geometric formulation of the field equations in the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms of classical field theories (of first order) in terms of multivector fields. This formulation enables us to discuss the existence and nonuniqueness of solutions of these equations, as well as their integrability.


The well-known theorem that the motion of any conservative dynamical system can be determined from the “Principle of Least Action” or “Hamilton’s Principle” was carried over into General Relativity-Theory in 1915 by Hilbert, who showed that the field-equations of gravitation can be deduced very simply from a minimum-principle. Hilbert generalised his ideas into the assertion that all physical happenings (gravitational electrical, etc.) in the universe are determined by a scalar “world-function” H, being, in fact, such as to annul the variation of the integral ∫∫∫∫H√(−g)dx 0 dx 1 dx 2 dx 3 where ( x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) are the generalised co-ordinates which specify place and time, and g is (in the usual notation of the relativity-theory) the determinant of the gravitational potentials g v q , which specify the metric by means of the equation dx 2 = ∑ p, q g vq dx v dx q . In Hilbert’s work, the variation of the above integral was supposed to be due to small changes in the g vq 's and in the electromagnetic potentials, regarded as functions of x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , x 3 .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document