Uniqueness of Generalized Solutions of Abstract Differential Equations

1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-382
Author(s):  
M. A. Malik
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Differential Equations ◽  
Open Subset ◽  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Scalar Product ◽  
Complex Hilbert Space ◽  
Generalized Solutions ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Abstract Differential Equations

Let Ω be an open subset of R and H be a complex Hilbert space; (,) represents scalar product in H.Let also A be a closed linear operator with domain DA dense in H and A* with domain D*A be its adjoint. Under graph scalar product DA and D*A are also Hilbert spaces.

Existence of Solutions of Abstract Differential Equations in a Local Space

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-244
Author(s):  
M. A. Malik
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Differential Equations ◽  
Complex Plane ◽  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Scalar Product ◽  
Existence Of Solutions ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Abstract Differential Equations ◽  
Local Space

Let H be a Hilbert space; ( , ) and | | represent the scalar product and the norm respectively in H. Let A be a closed linear operator with domain DA dense in H and A* be its adjoint with domain DA*. DA and DA*are also Hilbert spaces under their respective graph scalar product. R(λ; A*) denotes the resolvent of A*; complex plane. We write L = D — A, L* = D — A*; D = (l/i)(d/dt).

scholarly journals Identifications for General Degenerate Problems of Hyperbolic Type in Hilbert Spaces

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 194-210
Author(s):  
A Favini ◽  
G Marinoschi ◽  
H Tanabe ◽  
Ya Yakubov
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Hyperbolic Type ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Abstract Problem ◽  
Strict Solution ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Second Order Equations

In a Hilbert space X, we consider the abstract problem M∗ddt(My(t))=Ly(t)+f(t)z,0≤t≤τ,My(0)=My0, where L is a closed linear operator in X and M∈L(X) is not necessarily invertible, z∈X. Given the additional information Φ[My(t)]=g(t) wuth Φ∈X∗, g∈C1([0,τ];C). We are concerned with the determination of the conditions under which we can identify f∈C([0,τ];C) such that y be a strict solution to the abstract problem, i.e., My∈C1([0,τ];X), Ly∈C([0,τ];X). A similar problem is considered for general second order equations in time. Various examples of these general problems are given.

scholarly journals On periodic solutions of abstract differential equations

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 489-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. S. Eidelman ◽  
I. V. Tikhonov
Keyword(s):  
Differential Equation ◽  
Banach Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Differential Equations ◽  
Periodic Solutions ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Arbitrary Integer ◽  
Abstract Differential Equations

LetAbe a closed linear operator on a Banach spaceE. We study periodic solutions of the differential equationd Nu (t)/dt N=A u(t)with an arbitrary integerN≥1.

Formally Normal Operators Having no Normal Extensions

1965 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 1030-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Earl A. Coddington
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Null Space ◽  
Normal Operator ◽  
Closed Linear Operator ◽  
Normal Operators ◽  
The Given ◽  
Densely Defined ◽  
Made In

The domain and null space of an operator A in a Hilbert space will be denoted by and , respectively. A formally normal operatorN in is a densely defined closed (linear) operator such that , and for all A normal operator in is a formally normal operator N satisfying 35 . A study of the possibility of extending a formally normal operator N to a normal operator in the given , or in a larger Hilbert space, was made in (1).

scholarly journals Dirac structures on Hilbert spaces

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Parsian ◽  
A. Shafei Deh Abad
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Smooth Manifold ◽  
Real Hilbert Space ◽  
Dirac Structure ◽  
Dirac Structures ◽  
Basic Properties ◽  
Hilbert Subspace ◽  
Densely Defined

For a real Hilbert space(H,〈,〉), a subspaceL⊂H⊕His said to be a Dirac structure onHif it is maximally isotropic with respect to the pairing〈(x,y),(x′,y′)〉+=(1/2)(〈x,y′〉+〈x′,y〉). By investigating some basic properties of these structures, it is shown that Dirac structures onHare in one-to-one correspondence with isometries onH, and, any two Dirac structures are isometric. It is, also, proved that any Dirac structure on a smooth manifold in the sense of [1] yields a Dirac structure on some Hilbert space. The graph of any densely defined skew symmetric linear operator on a Hilbert space is, also, shown to be a Dirac structure. For a Dirac structureLonH, everyz∈His uniquely decomposed asz=p1(l)+p2(l)for somel∈L, wherep1andp2are projections. Whenp1(L)is closed, for any Hilbert subspaceW⊂H, an induced Dirac structure onWis introduced. The latter concept has also been generalized.

On Self-Adjoint Factorization of Operators

1969 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 1421-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heydar Radjavi
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Linear Operator ◽  
Bounded Linear Operator ◽  
Unitary Operator ◽  
Normal Operator ◽  
Complex Hilbert Space ◽  
Bounded Linear ◽  
Infinite Dimensional ◽  
Normal Operators ◽  
Adjoint Operators

The main result of this paper is that every normal operator on an infinitedimensional (complex) Hilbert space ℋ is the product of four self-adjoint operators; our Theorem 4 is an actually stronger result. A large class of normal operators will be given which cannot be expressed as the product of three self-adjoint operators.This work was motivated by a well-known resul t of Halmos and Kakutani (3) that every unitary operator on ℋ is the product of four symmetries, i.e., operators that are self-adjoint and unitary.1. By “operator” we shall mean bounded linear operator. The space ℋ will be infinite-dimensional (separable or non-separable) unless otherwise specified. We shall denote the class of self-adjoint operators on ℋ by and that of symmetries by .

scholarly journals Tomography in Abstract Hilbert Spaces

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 239-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Man'ko ◽  
G. Marmo ◽  
A. Simoni ◽  
F. Ventriglia
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Quantum State ◽  
Trace Formula ◽  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Scalar Product ◽  
Linear Operators ◽  
Infinite Dimensional ◽  
Infinite Dimensional Hilbert Space ◽  
Dimensional Hilbert Space ◽  
Rank One

The tomographic description of a quantum state is formulated in an abstract infinite-dimensional Hilbert space framework, the space of the Hilbert-Schmidt linear operators, with trace formula as scalar product. Resolutions of the unity, written in terms of over-complete sets of rank-one projectors and of associated Gram-Schmidt operators taking into account their non-orthogonality, are then used to reconstruct a quantum state from its tomograms. Examples of well known tomographic descriptions illustrate the exposed theory.

scholarly journals ON THE POWER QUANTUM COMPUTATION OVER REAL HILBERT SPACES

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 1350001 ◽  
Author(s):  
MATTHEW McKAGUE
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Quantum Computation ◽  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Quantum Circuit ◽  
Complex Hilbert Space ◽  
Complexity Classes ◽  
Complex Numbers ◽  
Real Numbers ◽  
Single Qubit ◽  
Quantum Complexity

We consider the power of various quantum complexity classes with the restriction that states and operators are defined over a real, rather than complex, Hilbert space. It is well known that a quantum circuit over the complex numbers can be transformed into a quantum circuit over the real numbers with the addition of a single qubit. This implies that BQP retains its power when restricted to using states and operations over the reals. We show that the same is true for QMA (k), QIP (k), QMIP and QSZK.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document