scholarly journals Quantifying the duration of the preclinical detectable phase in cancer screening: a systematic review

2022 ◽  
pp. e2022008
Author(s):  
Sandra ME Geurts ◽  
Anne MWM Aarts ◽  
André LM Verbeek ◽  
Tony HH Chen ◽  
Mireille JM Broeders ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096914132199748
Author(s):  
Andrew Wang ◽  
Briton Lee ◽  
Shreya Patel ◽  
Evans Whitaker ◽  
Rachel B Issaka ◽  
...  

Objective Digital health care offers an opportunity to scale and personalize cancer screening programs, such as mailed outreach for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, studies that describe the patient selection strategy and process for CRC screening are limited. Our objective was to evaluate implementation strategies for selecting patients for CRC screening programs in large health care systems. Methods We conducted a systematic review of 30 studies along with key informant surveys and interviews to describe programmatic implementation strategies for selecting patients for CRC screening. PubMed and Embase were searched since inception through December 2018, and hand searches were performed of the retrieved reference lists but none were incorporated ( n = 0). No language exclusions were applied. Results Common criteria for outreach exclusion included: being up-to-date with routine CRC screening ( n = 22), comorbidities ( n = 20), and personal history ( n = 22) or family history of cancer ( n = 9). Key informant surveys and interviews were performed ( n = 28) to understand data sources and practices for patient outreach selection, and found that 13 studies leveraged electronic medical care records, 10 studies leveraged a population registry (national, municipal, community, health), 4 studies required patient opt-in, and 1 study required primary care provider referral. Broad ranges in fecal immunochemical test completion were observed in community clinic ( n = 8, 31.0–59.6%), integrated health system ( n = 5, 21.2–82.7%), and national regional CRC screening programs ( n = 17, 23.0–64.7%). Six studies used technical codes, and four studies required patient self-reporting from a questionnaire to participate. Conclusion This systematic review provides health systems with the diverse outreach practices and technical tools to support efforts to automate patient selection for CRC screening outreach.


2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-409-S-410
Author(s):  
Aafke H. Van Roon ◽  
Leonie Van Dam ◽  
Lidia R. Arends ◽  
Ann G. Zauber ◽  
Graeme P. Young ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (20) ◽  
pp. 3882-3894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Chad-Friedman ◽  
Sarah Coleman ◽  
Lara N. Traeger ◽  
William F. Pirl ◽  
Roberta Goldman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. AB66
Author(s):  
Maleka Najmi ◽  
Sarah Harrington ◽  
David Farris ◽  
Kelly Nelson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document