scholarly journals Acoustic Myography in Assessment of Isokinetic and Isometric Muscle Strength in a Healthy Danish Population

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 235-253
Author(s):  
Else Marie Bartels ◽  
Waqas Ahmed ◽  
Jack Kvistgaard Olsen ◽  
Eva Littrup Andersen ◽  
Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Panzak ◽  
Ralph Tarter ◽  
Srinivas Murali ◽  
Joann Switala ◽  
Sandra Lu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Vasconcellos de Lima Costa e Silva ◽  
Anderson Luiz Bezerra da Silveira ◽  
Fabrízio Di Masi ◽  
Cláudio Melibeu Bentes ◽  
Maria do Socorro Cirilo de Sousa ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annet J. Dallmeijer ◽  
Eugene A. Rameckers ◽  
Han Houdijk ◽  
Sonja de Groot ◽  
Vanessa A. Scholtes ◽  
...  

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 4999
Author(s):  
Julie Gaudet ◽  
Grant Handrigan

Lower and upper limb maximum muscular force development is an important indicator of physical capacity. Manual muscle testing, load cell coupled with a signal conditioner, and handheld dynamometry are three widely used techniques for measuring isometric muscle strength. Recently, there is a proliferation of low-cost tools that have potential to be used to measure muscle strength. This study examined both the criterion validity, inter-day reliability and intra-day reliability of a microcontroller-based load cell amplifier for quantifying muscle strength. To do so, a low-cost microcontroller-based load cell amplifier for measuring lower and upper limb maximal voluntary isometric muscular force was compared to a commercial grade signal conditioner and to a handheld dynamometer. The results showed that the microcontroller-based load cell amplifier correlated nearly perfectly (Pearson's R-values between 0.947 to 0.992) with the commercial signal conditioner and the handheld dynamometer, and showed good to excellent association when calculating ICC scores, with values of 0.9582 [95% C.I.: 0.9297–0.9752] for inter-day reliability and of 0.9269 [95% C.I.: 0.8909–0.9533] for session one, intra-day reliability. Such results may have implications for how the evaluation of muscle strength measurement is conducted in the future, particularly for offering a commercial-like grade quality, low cost, portable and flexible option.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document