scholarly journals Strengthening National Disease Surveillance and Response—Haiti, 2010–2015

2017 ◽  
Vol 97 (4_Suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley Juin ◽  
Nicolas Schaad ◽  
Donald Lafontant ◽  
Gerard A. Joseph ◽  
Ezra Barzilay ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatma Saleh ◽  
Jovin Kitau ◽  
Flemming Konradsen ◽  
Leonard E. G. Mboera ◽  
Karin L. Schiøler

Abstract Background Disease surveillance is a cornerstone of outbreak detection and control. Evaluation of a disease surveillance system is important to ensure its performance over time. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the core and support functions of the Zanzibar integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) system to determine its capacity for early detection of and response to infectious disease outbreaks. Methods This cross-sectional descriptive study involved 10 districts of Zanzibar and 45 public and private health facilities. A mixed-methods approach was used to collect data. This included document review, observations and interviews with surveillance personnel using a modified World Health Organization generic questionnaire for assessing national disease surveillance systems. Results The performance of the IDSR system in Zanzibar was suboptimal particularly with respect to early detection of epidemics. Weak laboratory capacity at all levels greatly hampered detection and confirmation of cases and outbreaks. None of the health facilities or laboratories could confirm all priority infectious diseases outlined in the Zanzibar IDSR guidelines. Data reporting was weakest at facility level, while data analysis was inadequate at all levels (facility, district and national). The performance of epidemic preparedness and response was generally unsatisfactory despite availability of rapid response teams and budget lines for epidemics in each district. The support functions (supervision, training, laboratory, communication and coordination, human resources, logistic support) were inadequate particularly at the facility level. Conclusions The IDSR system in Zanzibar is weak and inadequate for early detection and response to infectious disease epidemics. The performance of both core and support functions are hampered by several factors including inadequate human and material resources as well as lack of motivation for IDSR implementation within the healthcare delivery system. In the face of emerging epidemics, strengthening of the IDSR system, including allocation of adequate resources, should be a priority in order to safeguard human health and economic stability across the archipelago of Zanzibar.


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Lukwago ◽  
M. Nanyunja ◽  
N. Ndayimirije ◽  
J. Wamala ◽  
M. Malimbo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. McKenzie André ◽  
Augusto Lopez ◽  
Samantha Perkins ◽  
Stephanie Lambert ◽  
Lesley Chace ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0200858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsung-Shu Joseph Wu ◽  
Matthew Kagoli ◽  
Jens Johan Kaasbøll ◽  
Gunnar Aksel Bjune

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon M. McDonnell ◽  
Helen N. Perry ◽  
Brooke McLaughlin ◽  
Bronwen McCurdy ◽  
R. Gibson Parrish

AbstractInformation is needed to support humanitarian responses in every phase of a disaster. Participants of a multilateral working group convened to examine how best to meet these information needs. Although information systems based on routine reporting of diseases are desirable because they have the potential to identify trends, these systems usually do not deliver on their promise due to inadequate organization and management to support them.To identify organizational and management characteristics likely to be associated with successful information systems in disaster settings, evaluations of the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) programs in 12 participating countries were reviewed. Characteristics that were mentioned repeatedly in the evaluations as associated with success were grouped into nine categories: (1) human resources management and supervision; (2) political support; (3) strengthened laboratory capacity; (4) communication and feedback (through many mechanisms); (5) infrastructure and resources; (6) system design and capacity; (7) coordination and partnerships with stakeholders; (8) community input; and (9) evaluation. Selected characteristics and issues within each category are discussed.Based on the review of the IDSR evaluations and selected articles in the published literature, recommendations are provided for improving the shortand long-term organization and management of information systems in humanitarian responses associated with disasters. It is suggested that information systems that follow these recommendations are more likely to yield quality information and be sustainable even in disaster settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document