The Texas Project, Part 4 - Final Results: Emissions and Fuel Economy of CNG and LPG Conversions of Light-Duty Vehicles

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
D-Y. Wu ◽  
Ronald D. Matthews ◽  
E. T. Popova ◽  
C. Mock
2015 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 762-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiming Gao ◽  
Scott J. Curran ◽  
James E. Parks ◽  
David E. Smith ◽  
Robert M. Wagner ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nicholas Lutsey ◽  
Daniel Sperling

In the past 20 years, the acceleration performance of light-duty vehicles in the United States has improved substantially while vehicles have gotten larger and heavier. Over the same period, fuel economy, measured as miles per gallon, has not improved. These data suggest that technological innovation in vehicles is not lagging but is not being used to improve vehicle fuel economy. This paper quantifies vehicle efficiency improvements in U.S. light-duty vehicles since 1975 as they relate to fuel consumption. Energy efficiency improvements have been strongly positive and relatively constant since 1975. The rapid rise in fuel economy in the late 1970s was due to a mix of efficiency improvements and downgrading of utility in the form of reduced size, power, and elimination of accessories and amenities (such as air conditioning). In contrast, since the mid-1980s, fuel economy has remained constant while the benefits of technological innovation were used to satisfy private desires (more power, size, and amenities), instead of the public interest (reduced greenhouse gas emissions and oil imports). An important policy question is how and to what extent future efficiency innovations might be directed to the public interest.


2017 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 1538-1561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Morganti ◽  
Marwan Al-Abdullah ◽  
Abdullah Alzubail ◽  
Gautam Kalghatgi ◽  
Yoann Viollet ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 817-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Shelby ◽  
Thomas G. Leone ◽  
Kevin D. Byrd ◽  
Frank K. Wong

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald D. Matthews ◽  
J. Chiu ◽  
J. Zheng ◽  
D.-Y. Wu ◽  
D. Dardalis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marc Ross ◽  
Alberto J. Lo´pez ◽  
Frank H. Walker

Half the engine displacement of popular cars and light trucks would be adequate for most driving. The split engine (SE) is introduced here as a concept to improve the fuel economy of light-duty vehicles with large spark-ignition internal combustion engines. It operates with a small-displacement portion of the engine for typical driving and activates the secondary portion of the engine to assist with high-power driving. SE is different from cylinder deactivation; the two portions of the engine have independent crankshafts which connect through a one-way clutch, a mechanical diode with indexing features to achieve the correct relative phase of the engine sections. For illustration, 6- and 8-cylinder SE are proposed and simple versions are modeled analytically. The 6-cylinder SE consists of two inline 3-cylinder engines of equal or near-equal displacement. The 8-cylinder SE consists of two opposed horizontal 4-cylinder engines of the same displacement. SE and cylinder deactivation are also compared. Moments of inertia and the time to connect both engine sections smoothly are estimated. Fuel economy improvements with SE are estimated for the EPA urban and highway cycles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document