CRIMPING TOOLS, TERMINAL, HAND, WIRE TERMINATION; IN-SERVICE INSPECTION GAGES FOR AS22520/17 CRIMP TOOLS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Yinsheng Li ◽  
Kunio Hasegawa ◽  
Phuong H. Hoang ◽  
Bostjan Bezensek

When a crack is detected in a pipe during in-service inspection, the failure estimation method given in the codes such as ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XI non-mandatory Appendix C or JSME S NA-1-2008 Appendix E-8 can be applied to assess the integrity of the pipe. In the current editions of these codes, the failure estimation method is provided for bending moment and pressure. Torsion load is assumed to be relatively small and is not considered in the method. In this paper, finite element analyses are conducted for 24-inch stainless steel pipe with a circumferential surface crack subjected to the combined bending and torsion moments, focusing on large and pure torsion moments. Based on the analysis results, a prediction method for plastic collapse under the combined loading conditions of bending and torsion is proposed for the entire range of torsion moments.


Author(s):  
Paul A. Meyer

Ultrasonic testing of metal welds has been in use for many years. Scanning methods using both contact and immersion methods are often used at the time of manufacture and also during periodic in-service inspection programs. But because of a variety of component configurations and potential flaw geometries it is often necessary to perform several inspections, each with a different probe configuration to assure adequate defect delegability. It is possible that a properly designed phased array probe can perform several different inspections without changing hardware thereby reducing inspection times. This presentation reviews the design and operation of ultrasonic phased array transducers and the necessary features to achieve the desired performance. Situations in which these probes have already been implemented effectively are also discussed.


Author(s):  
F. Champigny ◽  
P. Blin ◽  
J. L. Guilloteau

The last generation of PWR, the European Pressurizer Reactor, is being built both in Finland at Olkiluoto and in France at Flamanville where it will be the second unit in operation in two years. The conception of the reactor has no fundamental differences compared with the last French and German generations (i.e. N4 1450 MW and KONVOI 1300 MW). In fact the EPR is a synthesis of the best knowledge from both parts of Rhin river. Nevertheless, for what concerns the primary and secondary systems, few new issues have been implemented and they have important consequences for the pre-service inspection programme. First of it, main coolant lines and main components are declared break preclusion that means another approach for the in-service inspection and the requirements for pre-service inspection. A second one, is that the 1999 ministerial order will apply for the first time on a new unit. The inspection programme has to take it into account particularly in terms of NDE performance demonstration. In terms of structural integrity, the most important areas have been reviewed with fast fracture and fatigue criteria to determine the levels of NDE qualifications. This paper describes the important steps to reach the PSI and what is being developed in terms of NDE in relation to the structural integrity. Several examples are given to illustrate how EDF prepares the PSI of the EPR.


1997 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-60
Author(s):  
S. Qin ◽  
G. E. O. Widera

When performing inservice inspection on a large volume of identical components, it becomes an almost impossible task to inspect all those in which defects may exist, even if their failure probabilities are known. As a result, an appropriate sample size needs to be determined when setting up an inspection program. In this paper, a probabilistic analysis method is employed to solve this problem. It is assumed that the characteristic data of components has a certain distribution which can be taken as known when the mean and standard deviations of serviceable and defective sets of components are estimated. The sample size can then be determined within an acceptable assigned error range. In this way, both false rejection and acceptance can be avoided with a high degree of confidence.


Author(s):  
Claude Faidy

Based on ASME Boilers and Pressure Vessels Code the major fracture mechanic analysis is limited to protection of class 1 components to brittle fracture. All the Operators of future plants have to enlarge the scope of these analyses to different concepts, at design or operation stage: - brittle and ductile analysis of hypothetical large flaw - leak before break approach - break exclusion concept - incredibility of failure of high integrity components - end of fabrication acceptable defect - in-service inspection performance - acceptable standards in operation - Long Term Operation (LTO) All these requirements needs a procedure, an analysis method with material properties and criteria. After a short overview of each topic, the paper will present how RCC-M, RSE-M French Codes and ASME III and XI take care of all these new modern regulatory requirements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document