scholarly journals Effect of Adjuvant Therapy on Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Confirmed Stage I Uterine Carcinosarcoma: a Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-234
Author(s):  
Günsu Kimyon Cömert ◽  
Osman Türkmen ◽  
Gökhan Boyraz ◽  
İbrahim Yalçın ◽  
Duygu Altın ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1912-1918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi Kyoung Kim ◽  
Taek Sang Lee ◽  
Jae-Weon Kim ◽  
Jong-Min Lee ◽  
Beob Jong Kim ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate current clinical management of leiomyosarcoma (LMS) in Korea.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a Web-based survey among members of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group regarding their treatment of LMS.ResultsIn total, 77 (27.8%) of 277 members responded to the survey. For surgical treatment of stage I LMS, 26.8% indicated total hysterectomy only and 16.9% indicated total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Also, lymph node dissection was indicated by 54.9% of respondents, whereas 46.5% stated that bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy could be omitted in young patients. More than half (57.7%) of the respondents recommended against adjuvant treatment. For stage I LMS diagnosed after morcellation, 79.2% of the respondents recommended lymph node dissection and 56.4% recommended adjuvant therapy. As for advanced-stage LMS, in cases of complete resection, adjuvant chemotherapy was preferred by 63.1%. For incomplete resection, combined radiotherapy/chemotherapy was the most preferred adjuvant therapy (63.1%).ConclusionsAmong Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group members, there are many discrepancies in the clinical management of LMS. A large-scale prospective study to establish treatment guidelines is needed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh A. Cantrell ◽  
Laura Havrilesky ◽  
Dominic T. Moore ◽  
David O'Malley ◽  
Margaret Liotta ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
L. Cory ◽  
C.M. Brensinger ◽  
A.F. Haggerty ◽  
R.L. Giuntoli ◽  
N.A. Latif ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Matsuo ◽  
Kohei Omatsu ◽  
Malcolm S. Ross ◽  
Marian S. Johnson ◽  
Mayu Yunokawa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Jia ◽  
Qiwen Zheng ◽  
Jianjie Li ◽  
Jun Zhao ◽  
Meina Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThis study aimed to assess the different survival outcome of stage I-IIIA NSCLC patients who received right-sided and left-sided pneumonectomy, and to further develop the most appropriate treatment strategies. MethodsWe accessed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in the United States for the present study. An innovative propensity score matching analysis was used to minimize the variance between groups.ResultsFor 2,683 patients who received pneumonectomy, cancer-specific survival (HR=0.863, 95%CI: 0.771 to 0.965, P=0.010) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.875, 95%CI: 0.793 to 0.967, P=0.008) were significantly superior of left-sided pneumonectomy compared with right-sided pneumonectomy. Cancer-specific survival (HR=0.847, 95%CI: 0.745 to 0.963, P=0.011) and OS (HR=0.858, 95%CI: 0.768 to 0.959, P=0.007) were also significantly longer with left-sided over opposite-sided pneumonectomy after matching analysis for 2,050 patients. Adjuvant therapy could significantly prolong cancer-specific survival (67 versus 51 months, HR=1.314, 95%CI: 1.093 to 1.579, P=0.004) and OS (46 versus 30 months, HR=1.458, 95%CI: 1.239 to 1.715, P<0.001) among left-sided pneumonectomy patients after matching procedure. While adjuvant therapy did not increase cancer-specific survival for right-sided pneumonectomy patients (46 versus 42 months, HR=1.112, 95%CI: 0.933 to 1.325, P=0.236). Subgroup analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy could significantly improve cancer-specific survival and OS for all pneumonectomy patients. But radiotherapy was associated with worse survival for patients with right-sided pneumonectomy. ConclusionsPneumonectomy side could be deemed as an important factor when physicians choosing the most optimal treatment strategies.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1635-1641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicky Makker ◽  
Sara J. Kravetz ◽  
Jacqueline Gallagher ◽  
Oana-Paula Orodel ◽  
Qin Zhou ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after adjuvant therapy in stage I to stage IV uterine carcinosarcoma with rhabdomyosarcoma differentiation.MethodsMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center medical records from 1990 to 2012 were reviewed. Patients who received chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy (RT), or RT alone, for completely resected stage I to stage IV uterine carcinosarcoma with rhabdomyosarcoma differentiation were included.ResultsOf 53 patients, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage distribution was as follows: I, 13 (24.5%); II, 8 (15.1%); III, 13 (24.5%); and IV, 19 (35.9%). Forty-one (77.4%) of 53 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 34% of the patients who received chemotherapy also received pelvic RT or intravaginal brachytherapy (IVRT). Twelve (22.6%) of the 53 patients received only pelvic RT with/without IVRT. Paclitaxel-carboplatin was the most commonly used adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 13.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.5–17.0). The median OS for the entire cohort was 23.0 months (95% CI, 16.9–34.3). The median PFS periods by stage were 15.9 months for stages I/II versus 11.2 months for stages III/IV (P= 0.012). Median OS was not reached in the early-stage cohort. The median OS for the late-stage cohort was 20.9 months (P= 0.004). The median PFS periods by treatment were 10.4 months for pelvic RT with/without IVRT group versus 13.1 months for chemotherapy with/without pelvic RT with/without IVRT group (P= 0.498). The median OS periods by treatment were 23.6 months for chemotherapy with/without pelvic RT with/without IVRT group versus 16.9 months for pelvic RT with/without IVRT group (P= 0.501).ConclusionThe results suggest that chemotherapy alone or in combination with RT is associated with longer PFS and OS compared to RT alone. Only the stage of disease significantly affected PFS and OS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 915-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Mueller ◽  
Henrik Lajer ◽  
Berit Jul Mosgaard ◽  
Slim Bach Hamba ◽  
Philippe Morice ◽  
...  

ObjectiveWe sought to describe a large, international cohort of patients diagnosed with primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (PMOC) across 3 tertiary medical centers to evaluate differences in patient characteristics, surgical/adjuvant treatment strategies, and oncologic outcomes.MethodsThis was a retrospective review spanning 1976–2014. All tumors were centrally reviewed by an expert gynecologic pathologist. Each center used a combination of clinical and histologic criteria to confirm a PMOC diagnosis. Data were abstracted from medical records, and a deidentified dataset was compiled and processed at a single institution. Appropriate statistical tests were performed.ResultsTwo hundred twenty-two patients with PMOC were identified; all had undergone primary surgery. Disease stage distribution was as follows: stage I, 163 patients (74%); stage II, 8 (4%); stage III, 40 (18%); and stage IV, 10 (5%). Ninety-nine (45%) of 219 patients underwent lymphadenectomy; 41 (19%) of 215 underwent fertility-preserving surgery. Of the 145 patients (65%) with available treatment data, 68 (47%) had received chemotherapy—55 (81%) a gynecologic regimen and 13 (19%) a gastrointestinal regimen. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%–85%) for patients with stage I to II disease and 17% (95% CI, 8%–29%) for those with stage III to IV disease. The 5-year PFS rate was 73% (95% CI, 50%–86%) for patients who underwent fertility-preserving surgery.ConclusionsMost patients (74%) presented with stage I disease. Nearly 50% were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy using various regimens across institutions. The PFS outcomes were favorable for those with early-stage disease and lower but acceptable for those who underwent fertility preservation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document