Psycho-social correlates of adjustment in adult amputees

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
MA Ajala
Keyword(s):  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e0157339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Prati ◽  
Bruna Zani ◽  
Luca Pietrantoni ◽  
Diego Scudiero ◽  
Patrizia Perone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Surbeck ◽  
Tobias Deschner ◽  
Anja Weltring ◽  
Gottfried Hohmann

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathleen Waters

AbstractThis study examines the placement of an adverb with respect to a modal or perfect auxiliary in English (e.g., It might potentially escape / It potentially might escape). The data are drawn from two large, socially stratified corpora of vernacular English (Toronto, Canada, and York, England) and thus allow a cross-dialect perspective on linguistic and social correlates. Using quantitative sociolinguistic methods, I demonstrate similarity in the varieties, with the postauxiliary position generally strongly favored. Of particular importance is the structure of the auxiliary phrase; when a modal is followed by the perfect auxiliary (e.g., It might have escaped), the rates of preauxiliary adverb placement are considerably higher. As the variation is chiefly correlated with linguistic, rather than social factors, I apply recent proposals from Generative syntax to further understand the grammar of the phenomenon. However, the evidence suggests that the variability seen here is a result of postsyntactic, rather than syntactic, processes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (01) ◽  
pp. 63-95
Author(s):  
David L Richards ◽  
Mandy M Morrill ◽  
Mary R Anderson

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-33
Author(s):  
Anima Haldar ◽  
Baijayanti Baur Bai ◽  
Tushar Kanti Saha ◽  
Malay Mundle ◽  
Urmila Dasgupta ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan W. Carlson ◽  
jamil zaki

Are humans ever truly altruistic? Or are all actions, however noble, ultimately motivated by self-interest? Scientists and philosophers have long grappled with this question, but few have considered laypeople’s beliefs about the nature of prosocial motives. Here we examine these beliefs and their social correlates. In line with prior work, we find that people tend to believe humans can be, and frequently are, altruistically motivated. Moreover, people who more strongly believe in altruistic motivation act more prosocially themselves—for instance, sacrificing relatively high levels of money and time to help others—a relationship that holds even when controlling for trait empathy. People who believe in altruism also judge other prosocial agents to be more genuinely kind, especially when agents’ motives are ambiguous. Together, this work suggests that believing in altruism predicts the extent to which people both see altruism and act altruistically, possibly reflecting the self-fulfilling nature of such lay theories.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document