scholarly journals Use of a high-resolution pore-water gel profiler to measure groundwater fluxes at an underwater saline seepage site in Lake Kinneret, Israel

1999 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1802-1809 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. G. Mortimer ◽  
M. D. Krom ◽  
D. R. Boyle ◽  
A. Nishri
2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Berg ◽  
Karen J. McGlathery

2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (24) ◽  
pp. 9262-9267 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.I. Wassenaar ◽  
M.J. Hendry ◽  
V.L. Chostner ◽  
G.P. Lis

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 6241-6274 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Hendry ◽  
E. Schmeling ◽  
L. I. Wassenaar ◽  
S. L. Barbour ◽  
D. Pratt

Abstract. A method to measure the δ2H and δ18O composition of pore waters in saturated and unsaturated geologic core samples using direct vapor equilibration and laser spectroscopy (DVE-LS) was first described in 2008, and has since been widely adopted by others. Here, we describe a number of important methodological improvements and limitations encountered in routine application of DVE-LS over several years. Generally, good comparative agreement and accuracy is obtained between core pore water isotopic data obtained using DVE-LS and that measured on water squeezed from the same core. In complex hydrogeologic settings, high-resolution DVE-LS depth profiles provide greater spatial resolution of isotopic profiles compared to long-screened or nested piezometers. When fluid is used during drilling and coring (e.g., water rotary or wet sonic drill methods), spiking the drill fluid with 2H can be conducted to identify core contamination. DVE-LS analyses yield accurate formational isotopic data for fine-textured core (e.g., clay, shale) samples, but are less effective for cores obtained from saturated permeable (e.g., sand, gravels) geologic media or on chip samples that are easily contaminated by wet rotary drilling fluid. Data obtained from DVE-LS analyses of core samples collected using wet (contamination by drill water) and dry sonic (water loss by heating) methods were also problematic. Accurate DVE-LS results can be obtained on core samples with gravimetric water contents < 5 % by increasing the sample size tested. Inexpensive Ziploc™ gas sampling bags were determined to be as good as, if not better, than other, more expensive bags. Sample storage in gas tight sample bags provides acceptable results for up to 10 days of storage; however, measureable water loss and evaporitic isotopic enrichment occurs for samples stored for up to 6 months. With appropriate care taken during sample collection and storage, the DVE-LS approach for obtaining high resolution pore water isotopic data remains a promising alternative to study the hydrogeology of saturated and unsaturated sediments. Eliminating analytical interferences from volatile organics remains a challenge.


2009 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aharon (Ronnie) Sade ◽  
Gideon Tibor ◽  
John K. Hall ◽  
Moti Diamant ◽  
Hadar Sade ◽  
...  

1974 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 489-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colette Serruya ◽  
Miriam Edelstein ◽  
Utsa Pollingher ◽  
Salvador Serruya

1994 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1967-1972 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Krom ◽  
P. Davison ◽  
H. Zhang ◽  
W. Davison

1999 ◽  
Vol 225 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 130-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Dror ◽  
D. Ronen ◽  
M. Stiller ◽  
A. Nishri
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document