scholarly journals Learning from a teacher’s classroom discourses to re-modify the ELF framework in the ASEAN context

Author(s):  
Ribut Wahyudi ◽  
Sumti Chusna
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 485-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Jan Boerwinkel ◽  
Tsjalling Swierstra ◽  
Arend Jan Waarlo

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-298
Author(s):  
Cecilia Eriksson ◽  
Iann Lundegård

AbstractToday teachers face an increased challenge in listening to classroom discourses and students' areas of interest to let these coincides with the overall teaching purpose by feedback. Present study explore how classroom communication can be modeled to allow this. The socio-scientific-issues raised were at the same time aimed at creating relevance in the students’ social life as giving a respond to the curriculum. The data consisted of recordings from science lessons in grade 7 and 8 in Sweden. To make visible the tension that occurred between different discourses and displacement of power in the conversations, practical epistemological analysis has been made. This resulted in a categorization of five different ways the teacher is taking care of and reconnects the students’ impulses in relation to the overall purpose. Consequently, this study is offering opportunities for teachers to, in a consciously manner, reflect on different strategies for discourse feedback in teaching.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Ligozat ◽  
Jonas Almqvist

This special issue of the European Educational Research Journal presents a series of research papers reflecting the trends and evolutions in conceptual frameworks that took place within the EERA 27 ‘Didactics – Learning and Teaching’ network during its first ten years of existence. Most conceptual tools used in this field were elaborated in different socio-historical contexts for education and schooling delineated by nations and/or linguistic regions in Europe. This issue suggests possible integrative paths between certain frameworks debated in the Network 27 through co-authored papers. Crossed perspectives on the papers highlight certain important foci in the study of learning and teaching processes: (i) ‘Bildung’ discussed within didactics as a European research field; (ii) Educational goals, content and teaching methods expressed in curricula; (iii) Curriculum making processes; (iv) Teaching qualities, teaching (joint) actions and classroom discourses; and (v) Collaborative practices in teacher professional development. Finally, two strands of comparative research in didactics are sketched for increasing synergies in the field.


Teachers Work ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Charteris

As more than just knowledge and skills, The New Zealand Curriculum key competencies encompass dispositions for lifelong learning (OECD, 2005). A range of studies associate learner agency within the dispositions that are embedded in these key competencies (Carr, 2004; Hipkins, 2010; Hipkins & Boyd, 2011). Drawn from self-determination theory (OECD, 2009; Ryan & Deci, 2000), the competencies are strongly anchored in an essentialist frame-work. Interpreted this way, competencies can be likened to a virtual backpack that students carry about and draw from at will. A discursively constituted view of identity would suggest that this is not the case. Employing Davies’ (2010) conception of a subject-of-thought, where the subject is under erasure, the paper explores what agency as dispositionality can look like when it is performatively constituted in a competence-oriented curriculum (Ministry of Education, 2007). Rather being attributed static, essentialised identities, students are co-constituted in classroom discourses. The research has implications for how educators recognise moments when students agentically mobilise personal, social and discursive resources (Davies, 1990) in the classroom. The paper presents an argument for a dynamic theory of agency that incorporates a rhizomatic view of learner participation and interrupts essentialist interpretations of dispositionality. It opens up possibilities for new conceptions of key competencies as performative discursive practices.


2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun-Kyung Lee ◽  
Chui Im Choi ◽  
Gyuho Lee ◽  
Myeong-Kyeong Shin ◽  
Hojang Song

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Ligozat ◽  
Eva Lundqvist ◽  
Chantal Amade-Escot

One strand of comparative didactics aims at discussing the relationships between the theoretical constructions developed within subject didactics and how these can contribute to research about teaching and learning. This article explores the relationships between categories for analysing joint actions of teacher and students (didactic contract, milieu, mesogenesis, topogenesis, chronogenesis) and categories used in the pragmatist approach of classroom discourse analysis (practical epistemology and epistemological moves). We combine both frameworks to feature different types of breaches in the didactic contract and the building of continuity in teaching and learning actions for dealing with these breaches. Analyses are carried out through examples of classroom events in science education and physical education. We argue that these frameworks, when elaborated on and compared, enable us to characterise both generic and specific dimensions of teaching and learning in different subjects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Rech Penn

Much research on children’s classroom drawing emerged from an interest in the relationships between drawing and early writing and focused on drawing as a pedagogical tool to engage young children in planning, generating, and illustrating story ideas. In an eight-month case study of children’s drawing in a kindergarten language arts curriculum, the author focused on children’s classroom drawing not as a pedagogical intervention, but as an emergent event in which the intra-actions of children, drawing, and discourses coalesce. Of the many findings from this project, prevalent is the notion that children’s drawing and drawings function as vehicles for more than just pre-literacy—that drawing and drawings produce critical, creative, and constructive thinking and learning. In this article, the author discusses children’s drawing and drawings as events in which the often divergent interests of children, teachers, and curriculum materialize. Butler’s and Barad’s notions of performativity—the ways in which bodies materialize larger social discourses, such as gender—help the author to make sense of the ways children perform popular culture discourses, such as “monster,” or local classroom discourses, such as “writer,” in the kindergarten classroom. In looking at children’s drawing and drawings as material, discursive, and productive events, the author hopes to expand perceptions of children’s drawing beyond indicators of development, aesthetics, or literacy acquisition into critical, creative, and constructive learning experiences with significant cultural implications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document