Issues in First Language Speech Production Research

1991 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Crookes

Recent SLA theory development, supported by related developments in cognitive psychology, has made the study of SL speech production, hitherto neglected, a promising area of work. Recent developments in L1 production studies have provided a gradually strengthening foundation for investigations of L2 production with both use and acquisitional concerns. This article briefly sketches the current first language position as a necessary preliminary to a critical discussion of recent SL production research with particular regard to methodology.


1984 ◽  
Vol 246 (6) ◽  
pp. R928-R935 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Kelso ◽  
B. Tuller

We suggest that a principled analysis of language and action should begin with an understanding of the rate-dependent, dynamical processes that underlie their implementation. Here we present a summary of our ongoing speech production research, which reveals some striking similarities with other work on limb movements. Four design themes emerge for articulatory systems: 1) they are functionally rather than anatomically specific in the way they work; 2) they exhibit equifinality and in doing so fall under the generic category of a dynamical system called point attractor; 3) across transformations they preserve a relationally invariant topology; and 4) this, combined with their stable cyclic nature, suggests that they can function as nonlinear, limit cycle oscillators (periodic attractors). This brief inventory of regularities, though not mean to be inclusive, hints strongly that speech and other movements share a common, dynamical mode of operation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 1307-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrikanth Narayanan ◽  
Asterios Toutios ◽  
Vikram Ramanarayanan ◽  
Adam Lammert ◽  
Jangwon Kim ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natascha Müller

AbstractThe present article argues that the two effects observed in bilingual first language acquisition, delay and acceleration, have different sources. Whereas delay can be due to cross-linguistic influence on the competence or the performance level and to the mere cognitive burden to process two languages, acceleration is always rooted in efficient computation in a non-linguistic sense. The evidence for the difference between delay and acceleration effects stems from children who are raised bilingually from birth and who are studied during spontaneous speech production. It falls out rather naturally that linguistic development is immune to acceleration, while it can be delayed in bilingual children as compared to monolinguals.


2003 ◽  
pp. 253-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antje S. Meyer ◽  
Christian Dobel

1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Smith

Rapid, complex movements of orofacial structures are essential to produce the sounds of speech. A central problem in speech production research is to discover the neural sources that generate the control signals supplied to motoneurons during speaking. Speech movement production appears to share organizational principles with other motor behaviors; thus speech movements probably arise from an interaction of centrally generated command signals with sensory information. That speech movements are ultimately linked to the perception of language, however, has led many investigators to suggest that speech movement control involves unique features, features that may be linked to abstract linguistic units.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document