Health inequalities across the life course

Author(s):  
Fabian Kratz
2020 ◽  
pp. 157-160
Author(s):  
Harry Burns

The health of an individual is influenced by the circumstances in which he or she lives. Individuals who live in poverty are more likely to be unhealthy and die younger than individuals who are wealthy. The mechanism by which complex social circumstances cause health inequalities might be a failure to create capacity to manage life’s challenges. Most agree that well-being is created where individuals have an optimistic outlook, a sense that they are in control of their own lives, a sense of purpose and meaning in life, confidence in their ability to deal with problems, a supportive network of friends, and a nurturing family. If society is serious about tackling health inequalities, action needs to happen across the life course.


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
George A. Kaplan

It might be assumed that welfare states that have done so much to reduce inequality of opportunity have also reduced inequality of health outcomes. While great advances have been seen in reducing the rates of many diseases in welfare states, disparities in health have not been eliminated. Is it the case that lowering risks overall will leave disparities that cannot be remediated, and that such efforts are at the point of diminishing returns? The evidence suggests that this is not true. Instead the lens of social epidemiology can be used to identify groups that are at unequal risk and to suggest strategies for reducing health inequalities through upstream, midstream, and downstream interventions. The evidence suggests that these interventions be targeted at low socioeconomic position, place-based limitations in opportunities and resources, stages of the life course and the accumulation of disadvantage across the life course, and the underlying health-related factors that are associated with the marginalization and exclusion of certain groups. In their commitment to the values of equity and social justice, welfare states have unique opportunities to demonstrate the extent to which health inequalities can be eliminated.


Author(s):  
Mark L. Hatzenbuehler

This chapter introduces readers to the relatively new area of research on structural stigma through addressing four issues. First, it defines structural stigma and describes how this construct differs from stigma at individual and interpersonal levels. Second, the chapter discusses various measurement and methodological approaches that have been employed to study structural stigma. Third, it evaluates emerging research on the consequences of structural stigma for the health of stigmatized groups. In particular, it discusses illustrative research from several stigmatized statuses and reviews numerous health outcomes associated with structural stigma. Fourth, the chapter describes several promising areas for future research on structural stigma and health. The chapter concludes by arguing that accumulating evidence indicates that structural stigma has robust health consequences for stigmatized groups across the life course and thus represents an underrecognized mechanism underlying health inequalities between members of stigmatized and nonstigmatized groups.


2021 ◽  
pp. jech-2021-216430
Author(s):  
Michelle Kelly-Irving ◽  
Cyrille Delpierre

Understanding how structural, social and psychosocial factors come to affect our health resulting in health inequalities is more relevant now than ever as trends in mortality gaps between rich and poor appear to have widened over the past decades. To move beyond description, we need to hypothesise about how structural and social factors may cause health outcomes. In this paper, we examine the construction of health over the life course through the lens of influential theoretical work. Based on concepts developed by scholars from different disciplines, we propose a novel framework for research on social-to-biological processes which may be important contributors to health inequalities. We define two broad sets of mechanisms that may help understand how socially structured exposures become embodied: mechanisms of exogenous and endogenous origin. We describe the embodiment dynamic framework, its uses and how it may be combined with an intersectional approach to examine how intermeshed oppressions affect social exposures which may be expressed biologically. We explain the usefulness of this framework as a tool for carrying out research and providing scientific evidence to challenge genetic essentialism, often used to dismiss social inequalities in health.


Author(s):  
Daniel Holman ◽  
Alan Walker

Abstract Intersectionality has received an increasing amount of attention in health inequalities research in recent years. It suggests that treating social characteristics separately—mainly age, gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic position—does not match the reality that people simultaneously embody multiple characteristics and are therefore potentially subject to multiple forms of discrimination. Yet the intersectionality literature has paid very little attention to the nature of ageing or the life course, and gerontology has rarely incorporated insights from intersectionality. In this paper, we aim to illustrate how intersectionality might be synthesised with a life course perspective to deliver novel insights into unequal ageing, especially with respect to health. First we provide an overview of how intersectionality can be used in research on inequality, focusing on intersectional subgroups, discrimination, categorisation, and individual heterogeneity. We cover two key approaches—the use of interaction terms in conventional models and multilevel models which are particularly focussed on granular subgroup differences. In advancing a conceptual dialogue with the life course perspective, we discuss the concepts of roles, life stages, transitions, age/cohort, cumulative disadvantage/advantage, and trajectories. We conclude that the synergies between intersectionality and the life course hold exciting opportunities to bring new insights to unequal ageing and its attendant health inequalities.


2005 ◽  
Vol 60 (Special_Issue_2) ◽  
pp. S6-S6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven H. Zarit ◽  
Leonard I. Pearlin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document