Comparing Risk-Averse and Risk-Friendly Practitioners in Child Welfare Decision-Making: A Mixed Methods Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 37-57
Author(s):  
Emily Keddell
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Child Welfare ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Risk Averse

Post-mortem general surgeon reflection on decision-making: a mixed-methods study of mortality audit data

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (10) ◽  
pp. 993-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Cattanach ◽  
Arkadiusz P. Wysocki ◽  
Therese Ray-Conde ◽  
Charles Nankivell ◽  
Jennifer Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
General Surgeon ◽  
Post Mortem ◽  
Audit Data

scholarly journals Perceived social risk in medical decision-making for physical child abuse: a mixed-methods study

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather T. Keenan ◽  
Kristine A. Campbell ◽  
Kent Page ◽  
Lawrence J. Cook ◽  
Tyler Bardsley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Child Abuse ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Medical Decision Making ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Social Risk ◽  
Physical Child Abuse

scholarly journals Community sensitization and decision‐making for trial participation: A mixed‐methods study from The Gambia

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 406-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Dierickx ◽  
Sarah O'Neill ◽  
Charlotte Gryseels ◽  
Edna Immaculate Anyango ◽  
Melanie Bannister‐Tyrrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
The Gambia ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Trial Participation

Incongruence between women's survey- and interview-determined decision control preferences: A mixed methods study of decision-making in metastatic breast cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1950-1957
Author(s):  
Deborah Ejem ◽  
J. Nicholas Dionne-Odom ◽  
Yasemin Turkman ◽  
Sara J. Knight ◽  
Dan Willis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Decision Control

scholarly journals Integrated decision-making model for community-based rehabilitation service utilisation among persons with severe mental illness in China: protocol for a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e021528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruoxi Wang ◽  
Shangfeng Tang ◽  
Ian Shaw ◽  
Zhanchun Feng ◽  
Zhuo Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Service Utilisation ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Community Based Rehabilitation ◽  
Integrated Decision Making ◽  
Different Levels

IntroductionA common problem low-income and middle-income countries face is the scarcity of community-based rehabilitation (CBR) resources and low service utilisation among persons with severe mental illness (SMI). Despite this problem, the factors and pathways followed influencing one’s decision on service utilisation in China have not been fully comprehended. This study aims to develop a theory-based model that systematically describes the integrated decision-making process of mental health CBR utilisation among persons with SMI in China.Methods/DesignThis cross-sectional, mixed-methods study involves three main stages and is expected to last 3 years, from January 2018 to December 2020. In stage 1, the Social Exchange Theory is deployed as an analytical framework to comprehensively capture factors associated with tendency to use CBR services in China using semistructured interview methodology involving patients with SMI, their primary caregivers and CBR service providers. In stage 2, interpretive structural modelling will be applied to analyse the relationships between factors in different dimensions, at different levels and with different levels of impact. Stage 3 involves a multiregion survey among at least 300 family decision-makers (either the patient or their caregivers) in six communities in three cities to statistically validate the initial model derived in stage 2 using a further structural equation modelling.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (No 2017S319). All interviewees will be provided with written information about the study, and a signed consent will be retrieved prior to the interview. Rules on confidentiality and anonymity of data will be strictly followed. The findings of this study will be disseminated via international and domestic peer-reviewed journals, reports, conference presentations and symposium discussions. Reports will be submitted to the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

scholarly journals Healthcare providers' intentions to engage in an interprofessional approach to shared decision-making in home care programs: A mixed methods study

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
France Légaré ◽  
Dawn Stacey ◽  
Nathalie Brière ◽  
Kimberley Fraser ◽  
Sophie Desroches ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Shared Decision

A mixed-methods study of provider perspectives on My Birth Control: a contraceptive decision support tool designed to facilitate shared decision making

Contraception ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 420-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Dehlendorf ◽  
Reiley Reed ◽  
Judith Fitzpatrick ◽  
Miriam Kuppermann ◽  
Jody Steinauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Birth Control ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Provider Perspectives
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document