Veganism, (Almost) Harm-Free Animal Flesh, and Nonmaleficence

Author(s):  
Cheryl Abbate
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee MacLean
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-100
Author(s):  
Klara Fischer ◽  
Sebastian Hess

Swedish farmers were surveyed about their perceptions of genetically modified (GM) feed. Livestock in the EU are frequently given feed containing imported genetically modified (GM) crops, with GM fodder often being cheaper for farmers. However, there is also a growing market for ‘GM-free’ animal-based products. While public concerns about GMOs have been studied extensively, less is known about farmers’ views. The limited literature on farmers and GMOs tends to focus on the economic factors influencing their adoption. The present study contributes the perspective of farmers as members of the general public, thus including a broader set of factors known to be relevant for the public perception of GMOs. The results indicated that farmers were worried about: i) unforeseen consequences for the environment, ii) un­foreseen consequences for human and animal health, and iii) the dominance of multinational companies. Farmers who could expect their farm businesses to benefit from existing GMOs were more positive, whereas those who were unlikely to experience any benefits or who could expect their farm business to be adversely affected were more negative. Nevertheless, adherence to a broader set of positive or negative values suggests that Swedish farmers’ perspectives on GMOs go further than pure considerations of farm management.


1960 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 841-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut A. Gordon
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 382-387
Author(s):  
F. G. Frantz ◽  
L. N. Andrade ◽  
R. Araújo ◽  
J. I. Araújo ◽  
L. H. Faccioli ◽  
...  

1960 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-99
Author(s):  
A. D. L. Gorrill ◽  
J. M. Bell ◽  
C. M. Williams

This is the second in a series of reports on the growth, feed intake and digestibility responses of growing swine (50 to 110 pounds) involved in a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial test of the effects of wheat bran, pelleting, antibiotics and type of protein in the ration. Discussion in this paper was restricted to those factors affecting the responses to the inclusion of wheat bran.With approximately isocaloric diets the inclusion of 10 per cent bran resulted in a general increase of 6 per cent in feed intake (P = <.01) and 8 per cent in digestibility of protein. The greatest effects were obtained with antibiotic-free, animal protein-free, meal-type rations in which the inclusion of bran resulted in 18 per cent more feed and 28 per cent more digestible energy being consumed.The effect of bran on energy digestibility was small relative to its effect on protein. It is postulated that differences in the rates and site of absorption of starch and protein components may be related to the efficacy of bran in the digestive tract.The similarity observed between the effects of bran and antibiotics is discussed in relation to possible deficiencies of B-vitamins and amino acids.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document