Twenty First Century Neuroscience, Learning, and Behavior

2017 ◽  
pp. 9-29
Author(s):  
William Steele
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caylin Louis Moore ◽  
Forrest Stuart

For nearly a century, gang scholarship has remained foundational to criminological theory and method. Twenty-first-century scholarship continues to refine and, in some cases, supplant long-held axioms about gang formation, organization, and behavior. Recent advances can be traced to shifts in the empirical social reality and conditions within which gangs exist and act. We draw out this relationship—between the ontological and epistemological—by identifying key macrostructural shifts that have transformed gang composition and behavior and, in turn, forced scholars to revise dominant theoretical frameworks and analytical approaches. These shifts include large-scale economic transformations, the expansion of punitive state interventions, the proliferation of the Internet and social media, intensified globalization, and the increasing presence of women and LGBTQ individuals in gangs and gang research. By introducing historically unprecedented conditions and actors, these developments provide novel opportunities to reconsider previous analyses of gang structure, violence, and other related objects of inquiry. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Criminology, Volume 5 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


Author(s):  
Richard Wrangham

The naturalist Pliny the Elder (23–79 AD) could have been referring to bonobos in the twenty-first century when he wrote: ‘There is always something new coming out of Africa.’ Hare and Yamamoto designed Bonobos: Unique in Mind, Brain and Behavior to show that comparing humans with bonobos is fully as informative as comparing humans with chimpanzees. In meeting their goal they and their colleagues have produced a realm of new material....


Author(s):  
Casey Haskins

As we move beyond earlier postmodern era debates about the alleged death of aesthetics, Art as Experience remains a key resource for multidisciplinary discussions of “everyday aesthetics,” the aesthetics of embodiment, and the dialogue between pragmatist and other traditions such as Adornean Critical Theory. Dewey’s book focuses on what artists and audiences do, but it also presupposes his view of inquiry as a kind of transformative agency. In this way Dewey’s argument suggests a further view about the nonrepresentational nature of aesthetic theorizing itself. Such theorizing occurs—to use a metaphor with multiple Deweyan-pragmatist resonances—on a landscape of different possible linkages between belief and behavior. After addressing the aforementioned subjects, this chapter concludes with further thoughts about how the metaphor of aesthetic theorizing as a “landscape” invites further discussion of the place of art and aesthetic theorizing within the developing natural order as understood by Dewey in Experience and Nature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document