Student Learning and Development in Chinese Higher Education

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhao Cen
10.28945/4506 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 035-038
Author(s):  
MU ZHANG

Aim/Purpose: Book Review: Student Learning and Development in Chinese Higher Education: College Students’ Experience in China Background: This book describes and interprets student learning and development as perceived by students in Chinese higher education institutions. Impact on Society: Overall, this book appeals to higher education scholars from all countries and regions. It is a good resource for faculty in Chinese higher education institutions to deepen their understanding of undergraduate students to promote their learning and development. Chinese student affairs professionals struggling with how to support the students they work with would benefits greatly from this book. Likewise, Chinese graduate students contemplating a career in higher education/student affairs would also benefit from reading this book. It also provides global higher education professionals a good perspective to understand Chinese higher education under the background of higher education globalization.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-36
Author(s):  
Jim Riggs

With rising and wide spread expectations that commu-nity colleges will become stronger forces throughout the nation, the stage is now set for these institutions to become even bigger players in the landscape of higher education, economic development and social justice by helping to create a more inclusive, well-educated and engaged citizenry. This article looks inward at what com-munity college leaders, faculty and student services pro-fessionals need to do to transform their institutions into colleges that are truly ready to meet these rapidly grow-ing expectations and to be able to take full advantage of these new opportunities. Four key areas at the institution-al level are discussed that must be addressed in order for community colleges to make substantial and necessary improvements in student learning and development. These include: (1) expanding the definition and under-standing of what leads to student learning and success; (2) realigning and tightly coupling every function and activity at the college to better support student learning and success; (3) confronting the myth that community colleges are innovative and flexible institutions; and (4) instituting a new kind of leadership that is focused firmly on improving student learning and success. There are enormous opportunities waiting for community colleges that will require dramatic transformation and change throughout the organization.


Education ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke K. Fryer ◽  
Soyoung Lee ◽  
Alex Shum

Student learning and development in higher education is a broad topic. While learning and development are certainly related components of the university experience, researchers have generally focused on one or the other, thus creating two research streams that rarely converge. In student development, there are at least three long-established bodies of American research with origins in addressing university student attrition, development of epistemological beliefs, and personal development. Astin and Tinto’s ideas, while recently less often researched as distinct models, have been integrated into widely adopted concepts of engagement in higher education. American conceptions of engagement in higher education resulted in a national approach to quality assurance that has spread to Australia, China, and the United Kingdom. In student learning, there are at least three distinct models building, in part, on seminal cognitive processing and meta-cognitive processing research. One of these is an early cognitive processing–oriented model developed with adult learners, which came to be referred to as approaches to learning, its corollary learning environment research and related learning patterns research. Growing in salience during the same period and enclosed within the expanding area of meta-cognitive research, is the broad body of self-regulation research. In North America, this research grew from socio-cognitive theory or from learning strategies research. In Europe a wealth of starting points and models emerged. The final, and most recent model, building on twin platforms of motivational and cognitive processing research, is the Model of Domain Learning (MDL). Unlike the student development (North America–centered) research, the three models for understanding student learning during higher education have seen scant integration and only recent initial efforts at comparison and contrast. As a result, we presently have three distinct camps of research each examining the higher education experience from slightly different angles, each thereby yielding three perspectives that have yet to meaningfully learn from each other. Integration and cross-examination of these theories would help strengthen overall understanding of student learning and development. This article begins by presenting important academic journals and organizations that have emerged since the 1970s within the fields of student learning and development. The essential models addressing development and learning in higher education are each reviewed briefly, presenting and discussing the research that has shaped them. Motivation and beliefs for learning during higher education are included as a supplement for these models and important future directions for research.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey Ward

Educational accountability has become an increasingly influential factor in higher education. This chapter examines various government oversight and accreditation standards in Central and South America, Europe, and the United States and how student learning in higher education in music can be improved through meeting these standards. The author specifically describes music accreditation procedures of the National Association of Schools of Music and the American Music Therapy Association in the United States. Using accreditation standards as a guideline for program improvement, the author offers a variety of assessment best practices to engage higher education faculty in the assessment process, to improve instruction, to guide curricular development, and to ultimately improve student learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document