The role of knowledge calibration in intellectual humility

Author(s):  
Nicholas Light ◽  
Philip Fernbach
Philosophy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlie Crerar ◽  
Teresa Allen ◽  
Heather Battaly

Intellectual virtues are qualities that make us excellent thinkers. There are different analyses of exactly which qualities count as intellectual virtues: virtue responsibilists have emphasized praiseworthy character traits, such as open-mindedness and intellectual humility, while virtue reliabilists have emphasized reliable skills and faculties, such as vision, memory, and skills of logic. Importantly, all agree that intellectual virtues are (i) excellences, as opposed to defects; and (ii) distinctively intellectual and not, or not simply, moral. In other words, intellectual virtues are qualities that make us excellent (and not defective) as thinkers, not (or not simply) as people in general. This bibliography provides an overview of philosophical work on the intellectual virtues. It includes articles and books addressing responsibilist and reliabilist analyses of the structure of intellectual virtue; analyses of individual intellectual virtues; the application of intellectual virtue to education and other professional fields; the role of intellectual virtues in epistemology; and, finally, the structure of intellectual vice. It also includes some historical sources on intellectual virtue, though its focus is contemporary. Analyses of intellectual virtue (and of individual intellectual virtues) have developed in tandem with the epistemological subfield of virtue epistemology, which employs the notion of intellectual virtue in an account of knowledge. These analyses also frequently draw on virtue ethics, especially in the Aristotelian tradition. Some of the sources cited touch upon connections between intellectual virtue and these fields, though a fuller treatment of these topics can be found in the corresponding bibliographies on Virtue Epistemology and Virtue Ethics.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Krumrei-Mancuso

The goal of the current research was to examine potential predictors and outcomes of servant leadership among beginning leaders with self-reported and other-reported data. Participants included 29 college student leaders within the Residence Life program of a Christian university who were assessed prior to beginning their leadership positions and six weeks into their leadership roles. Those who responded to the challenges of early leadership with greater interpersonal and intellectual humility displayed more servant leadership and associated characteristics over time. Specifically, variance in humility during the transition into leadership was predictive of more servant leadership, empathic concern, perspective-taking, and kindness toward subordinates six weeks later. These findings offer initial empirical evidence to support the vaster theoretical basis regarding the role of humility in servant leadership. In addition, variance in salience of religious belief during the transition into leadership predicted more interpersonal humility, servant leadership, and kindness to subordinates. This is particularly remarkable given the high levels of religiosity displayed within the sample from the start of the study. This indicates that leaders integrating religion into their lives to a greater extent predicts leader outcomes more so than do religious identification or initial levels of religiosity.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Dorfman ◽  
Harrison Oakes ◽  
Igor Grossmann

Six studies (N = 1,617) tested the role of dispositional rejection sensitivity (RS) and manipulated power position for wise reasoning among managers and subordinates in workplace conflicts: intellectual humility, consideration of change/multiple ways a situation may unfold, recognition of others’ perspectives, search for compromise/resolution, and outsider’s viewpoint. RS was systematically related to lower performance on each aspect of wise reasoning, above and beyond other threat-related individual differences. Effects of power position were modest and nuanced: Whereas low-(vs. high-) power position facilitated intellectual humility, consideration of change, and search for compromise, high-(vs. low-) power position facilitated consideration of others’ perspectives. We discuss implications for understanding the influence of rejection-related tendencies and power on reasoning processes in social conflicts.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Bernabé-Valero ◽  
Isabel Iborra-Marmolejo ◽  
Maria J. Beneyto-Arrojo ◽  
Nuria Senent-Capuz

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 200-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leor Zmigrod ◽  
Sharon Zmigrod ◽  
Peter Jason Rentfrow ◽  
Trevor W. Robbins

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hansong Zhang ◽  
Joshua N. Hook ◽  
Jennifer E. Farrell ◽  
David K. Mosher ◽  
Daryl R. Van Tongeren ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document