Using ecological information in choice experiments to value ecosystem services restoration programmes in East Asia

Author(s):  
Yohei Mitani ◽  
Ståle Navrud
2020 ◽  
pp. 631-665
Author(s):  
Ho Huu Loc ◽  
Kim N. Irvine ◽  
Asan Suwanarit ◽  
Pakorn Vallikul ◽  
Fa Likitswat ◽  
...  

Forests ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Thellmann ◽  
Sergey Blagodatsky ◽  
Inga Häuser ◽  
Hongxi Liu ◽  
Jue Wang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 331-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex M. Lechner ◽  
Rachel L. Gomes ◽  
Lucelia Rodrigues ◽  
Matthew J. Ashfold ◽  
Sivathass Bannir Selvam ◽  
...  

Abstract Low- and middle-income countries in Southeast and East Asia face a range of challenges related to the rapid pace of urbanisation in the region, the scale of pollution, climate change, loss of ecosystem services and associated difficulties for ecological restoration. Possible pathways towards a more sustainable future lie in the applications of nature-based solutions (NBS). However, there is relatively little literature on the application of NBS in the region, particularly Southeast Asia. In this paper we address this gap by assessing the socio-ecological challenges to the application of NBS in the region – one of the most globally biodiverse. We first provide an overview and background on NBS and its underpinnings in biodiversity and ecosystem services. We then present a typology describing five unique challenges for the application of NBS in the region: (1) Characteristics of urbanisation; (2) Biophysical environmental and climatic context; (3) Environmental risks and challenges for restoration; (4) Human nature relationships and conflicts; and (5) Policy and governance context. Exploiting the opportunities through South-South and North-South collaboration to address the challenges of NBS in Southeast and East Asia needs to be a priority for government, planners and academics.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
毛碧琦 MAO Biqi ◽  
敖长林 AO Changlin ◽  
焦扬 JIAO Yang ◽  
高琴 GAO Qin ◽  
刘玉星 LIU Yuxing

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 661-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Settele ◽  
Joachim H. Spangenberg ◽  
Kong Luen Heong ◽  
Benjamin Burkhard ◽  
Jesus Victor Bustamante ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Johnston ◽  
Eric T. Schultz ◽  
Kathleen Segerson ◽  
Elena Y. Besedin ◽  
Mahesh Ramachandran

Stated preference scenarios often provide information on intermediate biophysical processes but omit information on the resulting final services that provide utility. This may cause respondents to speculate about the effects of intermediate outcomes on their welfare, leading to biased welfare estimates. This work clarifies distinctions between intermediate and final ecosystem services within stated preference valuation and develops a structural model by which to infer respondents’ speculations when a final ecosystem service is omitted. The model also derives implications for welfare estimates. Methods and results are illustrated using an application of choice experiments to fish restoration in Rhode Island's Pawtuxet watershed.


2019 ◽  
pp. 373-382
Author(s):  
Josef Settele ◽  
Joachim H. Spangenberg ◽  
Kong Luen Heong ◽  
Ingolf Kühn ◽  
Stefan Klotz ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1602
Author(s):  
Peter-John Meynell ◽  
Marc Metzger ◽  
Neil Stuart

There are increasing concerns for the ecological health of rivers, and their ability to provide important ecosystem services. Frameworks describing the character and condition of rivers have been developed in many parts of the world but rarely include river ecosystem services. South East Asia is a region with some of the world’s great rivers—Mekong, Salween and Ayeyarwady—running through six different countries, but data on river ecological character and condition is patchy and inconsistent. Development pressures on these rivers has never been higher, and ecosystem services may be lost before being described and valued. The development of a framework of ecological importance is envisaged, which maps out the relative contributions of river reaches to a wide range of ecosystem services. This could be a tool for river basin planning and water resource management, baseline information for impact assessment of infrastructure (for example, hydropower and irrigation), and for protecting ecologically important areas. We asked a diverse group of 109 river basin planners, and water and natural resource management professionals in the region whether a framework of ecological importance would support their activities, and which river ecosystem services are most important to be assessed. Our findings allow prioritisation of river ecosystem services to be assessed and mapped according to importance in different river reaches and sub-basins within the region. The locations of ranked threats and pressures on the river systems allow indication of river health and integrity in these sub-basins. We consider the feasibility of measuring ecosystem services and pressures through the identification of appropriate indicators, methods, and availability of global, regional, and national data.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Settele ◽  
Kong Luen Heong ◽  
Ingolf Kühn ◽  
Stefan Klotz ◽  
Joachim H. Spangenberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document