scholarly journals Miejsce i znaczenie AOTMiT w polskim systemie ochrony zdrowia

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-193
Author(s):  
Aneta Lipińska ◽  
Tomasz Nawrocki ◽  
Monika Patyna ◽  
Aneta Płusa ◽  
Maciej Pomorski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Government Agency ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Therapeutic Guidelines ◽  
Tariff System

Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System in health care system in Poland The Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System is national institution supervised by Minister of Health and funded by government. Agency is an advisory body in the reimbursement process. Agency has an impact on content of benefit basket, not only by evaluating new technologies but also re-evaluating benefit basket. Main goal of Agency is to provide patients access to the most effective and safe technologies. The most important Agency statements concern medical technologies and its modifications, qualification, removal in reference to guaranteed medical services. The Minister of Health, taking decisions about which health technology should be financed by public found, takes into account: recommendations and opinions of President of Agency, opinions and statements of the Transparency Council and the Council for Tariffs Affairs. The Agency’s task is also: setting tariffs for health care services; evaluating diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines prepared by medical societies; preparing opinions about national and local government health care programs.

REPORTS FROM THE SPANISH AGENCY FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (AETS)

1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 773-777 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Primary Health Care Services

Purpose of assessment: To assess the usefulness and convenience of including ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool in primary health care services provided by the Spanish National Institute of Health.

Health technology assessment and priority setting for health policy in Sweden

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Carlsson
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Priority Setting ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Patient And Public Involvement ◽  
Care Services

This article describes the development of health technology assessment (HTA) in Sweden, its influence on decision making, and its link with priority setting. Sweden has a well established governmental HTA body, the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU), and an increasing number of regional/local HTA organizations. HTA has had an impact on clinical practice and is used to some extent in policy decisions. Several initiatives have now been taken to develop processes for open priority setting of health-care services. With the establishment of a new agency to undertake reimbursement decisions on pharmaceuticals, and greater patient and public involvement in decision making, it seems inevitable that HTA will play a more important role in priority setting in the near future.

scholarly journals HEALTH TECHNOLOGY REASSESSMENT: SCOPE, METHODOLOGY, & LANGUAGE

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Noseworthy ◽  
Fiona Clement
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Universal Health Care ◽  
Informed Decision Making ◽  
Universal Health ◽  
Health Technology Reassessment

Health systems are challenged continuously to provide the highest quality universal health care within their means. While for 30 years, health technology assessment (HTA) has contributed to the process of evidence-informed decision making and the managed entry of new technologies, its remit has not expanded to include assessment of technologies currently in use, as a means of managing their use and potentially their exit. We propose that health technology reassessment (HTR) become standard practice, an integral part of all health technology assessment agencies, and that we develop standardized models and methodologies for reassessment drawing from what we have learned from HTA.

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN SWITZERLAND

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 576-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Cranovsky ◽  
Julian Schilling ◽  
Karin Faisst ◽  
Pedro Koch ◽  
Felix Gutzwiller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Managed Care ◽  
Social Welfare ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Day Surgery ◽  
Care Plans

Switzerland has a mixed public and private healthcare system. All citizens are enrolled in compulsory basic health insurance. A 1996 law allows people to choose among different sickness funds and managed care plans. The federal government is empowered to act on important health issues, but the 26 cantons have prime responsibility in health care and social welfare. They have their own laws on health care, hygiene, hospitals, and social welfare. These laws are not harmonized. The system is complex, with a mix of public (mainly hospitals) and private (mainly doctors' offices) providers. The health services are decentralized. Ambulatory care was traditionally provided in doctors' offices, but the last decade has seen the development of centers for day surgery, group practices, and managed care plans. Decisions on placement, location, and extension of services are decentralized. The payment system is very complex. Current trends include global budgets, cost analyses, and prices related to patient categories. However, coverage policy is developed centrally and includes both traditionally established services and new technologies. New technologies are added to the list only after evaluation by the Federal Coverage Committee. The coverage process integrates health technology assessment (HTA). Coverage can be granted in stages, including limited coverage and temporary coverage. Technologies and coverage can be reevaluated on the basis of registries or assessment information. The structure of the Swiss healthcare system does not lend itself to the establishment of a national HTA program. However, recent moves include the development of a coordinating mechanism for HTA in Switzerland.

OVERCOMING THE BARRIERS TO ACHIEVING UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE IN THE ASIAN REGION

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Mundy ◽  
Rebecca Trowman ◽  
Brendon Kearney
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Universal Health Care ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Cultural Issue ◽  
Access To Data ◽  
Universal Health

Objectives:The Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) Asia Policy Forum (HAPF) met to discuss the challenges of achieving universal health care (UHC) in Asia.Methods:Group discussions and presentations at the 2017 HAPF, informed by a background paper, including a literature review and the results of pre-meeting surveys of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies and industry, formed the basis of this article.Results:Affordability was identified as the greatest barrier to establishing UHC; however, other impediments include the lack of political will to implement UHC, and the cultural issue of deference to expert opinion instead of evidence-based assessments. Although HTA was identified as an important prioritization tool when adding new technologies to benefit packages, it is used inconsistently in the region, resulting in a less transparent decision-making process for stakeholders. Although regional challenges exist around real-world data (RWD), including a lack of capacity to enable information and data sharing, most policy or funding decision makers in the region have access to data. However, there appears to be a disconnect with the experience of industry, whose representatives identify the lack of RWD as their primary issue. To overcome these issues, both HTA agencies and industry agree that collaboration and transparency should be fostered to support the development of robust evidence generation in the region.Conclusions:There is a willingness for HTA agencies and industry to collaborate to develop HTA methodology for the prioritization of technologies in the Asia region that support healthcare systems to achieve the ultimate outcome of UHC.

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN THE NETHERLANDS

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 485-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bos
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
National Level ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Equal Distribution

The Dutch healthcare system is not a single overall plan, but has evolved from a constantly changing mix of institutions, regulations, and responsibilities. The resulting system provides high-quality care with reasonable efficiency and equal distribution over the population. Every Dutch citizen is entitled to health care. Health insurance is provided by a mix of compulsory national insurance and public and private insurance schemes. Hospitals generally have a private legal basis but are heavily regulated. Supraregional planning of high-tech medical services is also regulated. Hospitals function under fixed, prospective budgets with regulation of capital investments. Independent general practitioners serve a gatekeeper role for specialist and hospital services and are paid by capitation or fee for service. Specialists are paid by fee for service. All physicians' fees are controlled by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. Coverage of benefits is an important method of controlling the cost of services. There is increasing concern about health care quality. Health technology assessment (HTA) has become increasingly visible during the last 15 years. A special national fund for HTA, set up in 1988, has led to many formal and informal changes. HTA has evolved from a research activity into policy research for improving health care on the national level. In 1993 the government stated formally that enhancing effectiveness in health care was one of its prime targets and that HTA would be a prime tool for this purpose. The most important current issue is coordination of HTA activities, which is now undertaken by a new platform representing the important actors in health care and HTA.

Hospital-based health technology assessment in Brazil: current experiences and challenges

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Coelho de Soárez ◽  
Vera Lúcia Edais Pepe ◽  
Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Novaes
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Regulation System ◽  
Hospital Policy ◽  
National Network ◽  
Unified Health System ◽  
Use Of Resources

Abstract In Brazil, there is no consensus on the concept of hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA). There is great variability in the existing models and difficulty in evaluating their results—whether in respect of clinical decisions, quality of care, and hospital policy and management or in respect of optimizing the use of resources. This study aims to discuss the experiences of HB-HTA, its integration into the regulatory system for the adoption of new technologies into the Brazilian public (SUS) (Unified Health System), and its main challenges. During a workshop, a panel of specialists in HTA and/or HB-HTA was formed, representative of four different perspectives: (i) Health services and health technology assessment units, (ii) Academia, (iii) Secretary of State for Health, and (iv) the Federal SUS sector. This was followed by discussion, a preliminary consensus, contributions from the audience, a plenary session, and a final consensus. HB-HTA is not institutionalized, nor is it part of the regulation system for the adoption of new technologies in the SUS. The main challenges are the difficulties in creating qualified teams, financial support, and sustainability. The work of these bodies in respect of the evaluation of new technologies deserves further studies analyzing the relationship between the pressure for adoption from the hospital team and industry professionals and legal rulings. It is necessary to strengthen HB-HTA culture and implement this policy in hospital management, making assessment bodies a part of managerial and decision-making processes in hospitals, and develop regional collaborative networks and a national network of HTA.

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND CLINICAL DECISION MAKING:

1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Granados
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Systematic Process

This paper examines the rationality of the concepts underlying evidence—based medicineand health technology assessment (HTA), which are part of a new current aimed at promoting the use of the results of scientific studies for decision making in health care. It describes the different approaches and purposes of this worldwide movement, in relation to clinical decision making, through a summarized set of specific HTA case studies from Catalonia, Spain. The examples illustrate how the systematic process of HTA can help in several types of uncertainties related to clinical decision making.

scholarly journals Health technology assessment in the United Kingdom

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (S1) ◽  
pp. 178-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Drummond ◽  
David Banta
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Clinical Excellence ◽  
Present Situation ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Short Run

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe generally the development and present situation with health technology assessment (HTA) in the United Kingdom.Methods: The methods used are a review of important materials that have described the development process and present situation, supplemented by some personal experiences.Results: The United Kingdom has been characterized historically as a country with a strong interest in evidence in health care, both clinical trials for efficacy and cost-effectiveness analyses. However, this evidence was not well-linked to the needs of the National Health Services (NHS) before formation of the NHS R&D Programme in 1991, The R&D Programme brought substantial resources into HTA and related activities, with the central aim of improving health care in Britain and increasing value for money. However, policy makers as well as staff of the R&D Programme were dissatisfied with the use of the HTA results in clinical and administrative practice. Therefore, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) was formed in 1999. NICE issues guidance intended to influence practical decision making in health care at the national and local levels, based on efficacy information and, in some cases, economic analyses. NICE is now also seeking ways to maximize impacts on practice.Conclusions: The UK experience shows that information on clinical and cost-effectiveness may not be enough to change practice, at least in the short-run. Still, one may conclude that the United Kingdom now has one of the few most important and influential HTA programs in the world.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document