scholarly journals A Study on the Odor Characteristics and Identification of Microbial in Biological Swine Manure Treatment Process by Bioreactor

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 526-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon-il Ko ◽  
Gui-hwan Park ◽  
Ju-soon Bae ◽  
Gil-young Oh ◽  
Seon-yong Chung
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minseok Kim ◽  
Jung-Im Yun ◽  
Seung-Gun Won ◽  
Kyu-Hyun Park

We investigated microbial diversity in a manure storage tank (MST) storing untreated manure and an aeration tank (AT) during swine manure treatment process using the next-generation sequencing in order to find the aeration effect on microbial diversity. Proteobacteria were more abundant in the AT group than in the MST group and may include denitrifying bacteria contributing to nitrous oxide (N2O) emission or aerobic bacteria stimulated by oxygen. The opposite held true for the phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes that may include anaerobic bacteria inhibited under aerobic conditions in the AT group.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 787
Author(s):  
Anna Lymperatou ◽  
Niels B. Rasmussen ◽  
Hariklia N. Gavala ◽  
Ioannis V. Skiadas

Swine manure mono-digestion results in relatively low methane productivity due to the low degradation rate of its solid fraction (manure fibers), and due to the high ammonia and water content. The aqueous ammonia soaking (AAS) pretreatment of manure fibers has been proposed for overcoming these limitations. In this study, continuous anaerobic digestion (AD) of manure mixed with optimally AAS-treated manure fibers was compared to the AD of manure mixed with untreated manure fibers. Due to lab-scale pumping restrictions, the ratio of AAS-optimally treated manure fibers to manure was only 1/3 on a total solids (TS) basis. However, the biogas productivity and methane yield were improved by 17% and 38%, respectively, also confirming the predictions from a simplified 1st order hydrolysis model based on batch experiments. Furthermore, an improved reduction efficiency of major organic components was observed for the digester processing AAS-treated manure fibers compared to the non-treated one (e.g., 42% increased reduction for cellulose fraction). A preliminary techno-economic analysis of the proposed process showed that mixing raw manure with AAS manure fibers in large-scale digesters could result in a 72% increase of revenue compared to the AD of manure mixed with untreated fibers and 135% increase compared to that of solely manure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 273 ◽  
pp. 506-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Wang ◽  
Min Addy ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Caitlyn Nekich ◽  
Renchuan Zhang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Zhou ◽  
Jining Zhang ◽  
Guoyan Zou ◽  
Shohei Riya ◽  
Masaaki Hosomi

To evaluate the feasibility of swine manure treatment by a proposed Dry Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion (DT-AD) system, we evaluated the methane yield of swine manure treated using a DT-AD method with rice straw under different C/N ratios and solid retention time (SRT) and calculated the mass and energy balances when the DT-AD system is used for swine manure treatment from a model farm with 1000 pigs and the digested residue is used for forage rice production. A traditional swine manure treatment Oxidation Ditch system was used as the study control. The results suggest that methane yield using the proposed DT-AD system increased with a higher C/N ratio and shorter SRT. Correspondently, for the DT-AD system running with SRT of 80 days, the net energy yields for all treatments were negative, due to low biogas production and high heat loss of digestion tank. However, the biogas yield increased when the SRT was shortened to 40 days, and the generated energy was greater than consumed energy when C/N ratio was 20:1 and 30:1. The results suggest that with the correct optimization of C/N ratio and SRT, the proposed DT-AD system, followed by using digestate for forage rice production, can attain energy self-sufficiency.


2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Hamilton ◽  
I. N. Kourtchev ◽  
P . M. Ndegwa ◽  
H. J. Cumba ◽  
F. Gioelli

Author(s):  
Beatriz Molinuevo-Salces ◽  
Berta Riaño ◽  
Matías B. Vanotti ◽  
María C. García-González

2009 ◽  
Vol 100 (22) ◽  
pp. 5485-5489 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kunz ◽  
M. Miele ◽  
R.L.R. Steinmetz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document