scholarly journals THE FOUR-FACTOR MODEL AND STOCK RETURNS IN BANGLADESH

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-149
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saifuddin Khan ◽  
Md. Miad Uddin Fahim
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Market Factors ◽  
Fama And French ◽  
Three Factor

For determining the expected return, and asset pricing, CAPM (Capital asset pricing model) is being used dominantly grounded on only the market (systematic) risk-factor though several anomalies have been revealed in this model. Fama and French (1993) have addressed those anomalies and developed the Three-factor model by combining size and value factors besides market factors. Over time, Carhart (1997) has further developed a model addressing momentum factor besides the three factors of Fama and French (1993) which is known as the Carhart four-factor model. Though several kinds of research have been conducted on the CAPM and three-factor model, little works have been accompanied by the Carhart four-factor model in an evolving market like Bangladesh. The goal of this work is to examine the validity of the Carhart four-factor model and examine the loftier explanatory power in Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). From the regression analysis of the Carhart model, we have found that market, size, value, and momentum explain the excess stock return. This study indicates that the Carhart model has the lowest GRS F-statistic, highest adjusted R-squared, and lowest Sharpe ratio in contrast to the CAPM and three-factor model which indicates the superior explanatory power and statistical validity of the Carhart model. JEL Classification Codes: G12, G13, G14.

scholarly journals Empirical Test of Fama and French Three-Factor Model in the Egyptian Stock Exchange

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-18
Author(s):  
Mustafa Hussein Abd-Alla ◽  
Mahmoud Sobh
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Empirical Test ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Book To Market Ratio ◽  
Excess Stock Returns ◽  
Fama And French ◽  
Egyptian Stock Exchange ◽  
Three Factor

We test the empirical validity of the three-factor model of Fama and French in the Egyptian Stock Exchange (EGX) using monthly excess stock returns of 50 stocks listed on the EGX from January 2014 to December 2018. Our findings do not support Fama and French three-factor model, where the coefficient of the beta was insignificant. The “SBM” coefficient and the “HML” coefficient were equal to zero and insignificant, which confirms the absence of the small firm effect and book-to-market ratio effect in the market. We conclude that there is no relation between expected return and Fama-French risk factors.

scholarly journals The Impact of the Financial Sector on Asset Pricing Tests: Evidence from the Colombo Stock Exchange

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Amal Peter Abeysekera ◽  
Nimal Pulukkuttige Don
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Size Premium ◽  
Fama And French ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Three Factor ◽  
Better Than

<p>This paper aims to identify how the inclusion of financial sector affects the ability of asset pricing models to explain the average stock returns in the CSE.  Most of the asset pricing researches, the firms in the financial sector are excluded on the basis that their characteristics and the leverage are notably different than firms in other industries. Therefore the objective of this study is to identify the impact of the inclusion of financial sector on the ability of the Carhart four-factor model to explain the average stock returns in the CSE and to compare its performance with the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Fama and French three-factor model. The study finds that the four-factor model; incorporating the market premium, size premium, value premium and momentum premium provides a satisfactory explanation of the variation in the cross-section of average stock returns in the CSE, even when the financial sector is included. It is found that the Carhart four-factor model performs better than the CAPM in all scenarios; and that it performs notably better than the Fama and French three-factor model.However, there is no notable difference in the findings either the financial sector is included or not. </p>

An Empirical Test of Capital Asset-pricing Model and Three-factor Model of Fama in Indian Stock Exchange

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-307
Author(s):  
Nenavath Sreenu
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Three Factor

This article aims to test the capital asset-pricing model (CAPM) and three-factor model of Fama in Indian Stock Exchange, and it has focused on the recent growth of capital markets in India and the need of practitioners in these markets to determine a stable price for securities, and achieving expected returns has brought into consideration the theories predicting price securities Among different models the CAPM of Sharp. The study uses a sample of daily data and annual average for 54 companies listed on the National Stock Exchange, during the period from 2010 to 2016. The research article’s intention is to find whether the relationship between expected return and risk is linear, if beta is a complete measure of the risk and if a higher risk is compensated by a higher expected return. The results confirm that the intercept is statistically insignificant, upholding theory, for both individual assets and portfolios. The tests do not essentially provide validation against CAPM and Fama; however, other simulations can be built, more close to reality, by improving the model and offering an alternative which also takes into account the specific conditions of the Indian capital market and the global financial crisis consequences.

scholarly journals Empirical Test of Single Factor and Multi-Factor Asset Pricing Models: Evidence from Non Financial Firms on the Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE)

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Prince Acheampong ◽  
Sydney Kwesi Swanzy
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
Portfolio Returns ◽  
Ghana Stock Exchange ◽  
Three Factor

<p>This paper examines the explanatory power of a uni-factor asset pricing model (CAPM) against a multi-factor model (The Fama-French three factor model) in explaining excess portfolio returns on non-financial firms on the Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE). Data covering the period January 2002 to December 2011 were used. A six Size- Book-to-Market (BTM) ratio portfolios were formed and used for the analysis. The paper revealed that, a uni-factor model like the (CAPM) could not predict satisfactorily, the excess portfolio returns on the Ghana Stock Exchange. By using the multi-factor asset pricing model, that is, the Fama-French Three Factor Model, excess portfolio returns were better explained. It is then conclusive enough that, the multi-factor asset pricing model introduced by Fama and French (1992) was a better asset pricing model to explain excess portfolio returns on the Ghana Stock Exchange than the Capital Assets Pricing Model (CAPM) and that there exist the firm size and BTM effects on the Ghanaian Stock market.</p>

The role of efficiency in capital asset pricing: a research on Nasdaq technology sector

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 1479-1493
Author(s):  
Hakan Aygoren ◽  
Emrah Balkan
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Efficiency Factor ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Three Factor

PurposeThe aim of this study is to investigate the role of efficiency in capital asset pricing. The paper explores the impact of a four-factor model that involves an efficiency factor on the returns of Nasdaq technology firms.Design/methodology/approachThe paper relies on data of 147 firms from July 2007 to June 2017 to examine the impact of efficiency on stock returns. The performances of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), Fama–French three-factor model and the proposed four-factor model are evaluated based on the time series regression method. The parameters such as the GRS F-statistic and adjusted R² are used to compare the relative performances of all models.FindingsThe results show that all factors of the models are found to be valid in asset pricing. Also, the paper provides evidence that the explanatory power of the proposed four-factor model outperforms the explanatory power of the CAPM and Fama–French three-factor model.Originality/valueUnlike most asset pricing studies, this paper presents a new asset pricing model by adding the efficiency factor to the Fama–French three-factor model. It is documented that the efficiency factor increases the predictive ability of stock returns. Evidence implies that investors consider efficiency as one of the main factors in pricing their assets.

scholarly journals Modelos de Precificação de Ativos e o Efeito Liquidez: Evidências Empíricas no Mercado Acionário Brasileiro

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio André Veras Machado ◽  
Otávio Ribeiro de Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Liquidity Premium ◽  
Pricing Models ◽  
Portfolio Returns ◽  
Asset Pricing Models ◽  
Three Factor

This paper is aims to analyze whether a liquidity premium exists in the Brazilian stock market. As a second goal, we include liquidity as an extra risk factor in asset pricing models and test whether this factor is priced and whether stock returns were explained not only by systematic risk, as proposed by the CAPM, by Fama and French’s (1993) three-factor model, and by Carhart’s (1997) momentum-factor model, but also by liquidity, as suggested by Amihud and Mendelson (1986). To achieve this, we used stock portfolios and five measures of liquidity. Among the asset pricing models tested, the CAPM was the least capable of explaining returns. We found that the inclusion of size and book-to-market factors in the CAPM, a momentum factor in the three-factor model, and a liquidity factor in the four-factor model improve their explanatory power of portfolio returns. In addition, we found that the five-factor model is marginally superior to the other asset pricing models tested.

Who is King in Factor Zoo? Case of the Chinese Stock Market

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-102
Author(s):  
Simon M. S. So
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Market ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Investment Strategy ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Chinese Stock Market ◽  
Fama And French ◽  
Three Factor

This paper aimed to evaluate and compare individual performances and contributions of seven well-known factors, selected from four widely cited asset pricing models: (1) the capital asset pricing model of Sharpe (1964), (2) the three-factor model of Fama and French (1993) the augmented four-factor model of Carhart (1997), (3) the five-factor model of Fama and French (2015), and (4) the illiquidity model of Amihud, et al. (2015) in capturing the time-series variation of stock returns and absorbing the 12 prominent anomalies. The anomalies were constructed by forming long-short portfolios, and regressions were run to examine their monthly returns from 2000 to 2019. We found that there is no definite and absolute “king” in the factor zoo in the Chinese stock market, and size is the relative “king” that can absorb the maximum number of anomalies. Evidence also indicates that the three-factor model of Fama and French may still play an important role in pricing assets in the Chinese stock market. The results can provide investors with a reliable risk factor and help investors form an effective investment strategy. This paper contributes to asset pricing literature in the Chinese market.G1

scholarly journals Empirical Evidence of CAPM and Fama French 3 factor model at Cement Industry of DSE

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Avijit Mallik ◽  
Mrs. Syeda Mahrufa Bashar ◽  
Md. Sadid Uddin
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Risk Premium ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Cement Industry ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Capm Model ◽  
Cement Manufacturing ◽  
Three Factor

The study discusses empirical evidence on the explanatory power for cement manufacturing industries of the Dhaka Stock Exchange in light of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Fama French three-factor model. For calculating the market return, both DSEX and DS30 indexes have been used. The study revealed that the Fama French three-factor model has better explanatory power compared to the CAPM model in the Dhaka Stock Exchange. Moreover, the size risk premium has a significant influence in explaining the expected return for cement industries of the Dhaka Stock Exchange for both DSEX and DS30. On the other hand, the value risk premium has significant power in explaining the expected return for cement industries in the Dhaka Stock Exchange.

Risk and returns in Shari’ah-compliant cross-section stocks: evidence from an emerging market

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 621-643
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hanif ◽  
Abdullah Iqbal ◽  
Zulfiqar Shah
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Market Returns ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Three Factor

Purpose This study aims to understand and document the impact of market-based – market returns and momentum – as well as firm-specific – size, book-to-market (B/M) ratio, price-to-earnings ratio (PER) and cash flow (CF) – factors on pricing of Shari’ah-compliant securities as explanation of variations in stock returns in an emerging market – Pakistan’s Karachi Stock Exchange. Design/methodology/approach Initially, the authors test Fama and French (FF) three-factor model – market risk premium, size and B/M – followed by modified FF model by including additional risk factors (PER, CF and momentum) over a 10-year period (2001-2010). Findings Our results support superiority of FF three-factor model over single-factor capital asset pricing model. However, addition of further risk factors – including PER, CF and momentum – improves explanatory power of the model, as well as refines the selection of risk factors. In this study, CF, B/M and momentum factors remain insignificant. Traditional B/M factor in FF model is replaced by PER. Practical implications Based on the modified FF model, the authors propose a stock valuation model for Shari’ah-compliant securities consisting of three factors: market returns, size and earnings, which explains 76per cent variations in cross sectional stock returns. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study (which combines market-based as well as fundamental factors) on pricing of Islamic securities and identification of risk factors in an emerging market – Karachi Stock Exchange.

scholarly journals Application of asset pricing models: evidence from Saudi exchange

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 348-368
Author(s):  
Hussein Mohammad Salameh
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Stock Exchanges ◽  
East Region ◽  
Consistent Model ◽  
Fama And French ◽  
The Impact

The Saudi Arabia Stock Exchange (Tadawul) is one of the biggest emerging Stock Exchanges in the Middle East region. Therefore, this research aims to apply Fama and French (2015) 5-factor model on Tadawul, and compares it with the Fama and French 3-factor model and CAPM to check the applicability of the models in Tadawul and the identity of the factors that can affect stock returns. Furthermore, the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) regression has been implemented to examine the impact between the variables in the models. Empirically, the results show that Fama and French (2015) 5-factor model is the most consistent model in comparison to the other two models in terms of explaining the cross-section of average stock returns in Tadawul. However, it is not the best according to the intercepts results of all the regressions in 2x3, 2x2, or 2x2x2x2 sorts. Besides, Fama and French (2015) 5-factor model has the highest explanatory power in most of the portfolios based on the adjusted R2 regardless of the sort (2x3, 2x2, or 2x2x2x2). Finally, the results conclude that Fama and French (2015) 5-factor model can be an applicable model in Tadawul but only market and size can affect the stock returns, while the value, profitability, and investment cannot. Accordingly, the author recommends that, as a continuation of this research, further research can be done, which investigates a model with additional factors like momentum and illiquidity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document