Are there Complex Assortative Mating Patterns for Humans? Analysis of 340 Spanish Couples

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 578-598
Author(s):  
Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
Author(s):  
Annika Elwert

AbstractThis paper studies how immigrant–native intermarriages in Sweden are associated with individual characteristics of native men and women and patterns of assortative mating. Patterns of educational- and age-assortative mating that are similar to those found in native–native marriages may reflect openness to immigrant groups, whereas assortative mating patterns that indicate status considerations suggest that country of birth continues to serve as a boundary in the native marriage market. The study uses Swedish register data that cover the entire Swedish population for the period of 1991–2009. The results from binomial and multinomial logistic regressions show that low status of natives in terms of economic and demographic characteristics is associated with intermarriage and that intermarriages are characterized by educational and age heterogamy more than are native–native marriages. The findings indicate that immigrant women as well as immigrant men become more attractive marriage partners if they are considerably younger than their native spouses. This is particularly true for intermarriages with immigrants from certain regions of origin, such as wives from Asia and Africa and husbands from Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. Gender differences in the intermarriage patterns of native men and women are surprisingly small.


Ibis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 464-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas ◽  
Szymon M. Drobniak ◽  
Dariusz Jakubas ◽  
Monika Kulpińska-Chamera ◽  
Olivier Chastel

Behaviour ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Lindsey Swierk ◽  
Tracy Langkilde

Abstract Exploration of size-assortative mating (SAM) in animals has led to a near consensus that it arises through constraints in choice, such as preference for large females combined with a large male advantage during intrasexual competition. Although such ‘apparent’ SAM is well explored, whether SAM arises because of specific preferences for size-matched mates has been less thoroughly considered. We tested for ‘preference-based’ SAM in an explosively breeding frog (Rana sylvatica), quantifying how male and female sizes affected fertilization and if males preferred size-matched females. We found that size mismatch severely reduced fertilization. Furthermore, males preferred size-matched, not larger, females in mate choice trials. Because males that mated with much larger females fertilized fewer eggs overall than they would have with size-matched females, male preference for size-matched females may be adaptive. Our results expand understanding of the mechanisms underlying SAM, suggesting that multiple mechanisms may simultaneously cause size-assortative mating patterns to emerge.


2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Lei Yu ◽  
Hong Jing Li ◽  
Xin Lu

Large-male mating advantage and size-assortative mating are two different size-dependent mating patterns which deviate from random mating in frogs. These two pairing patterns may arise due to female choice, male-male competition, male choice, or a combination of these. Our study investigated the mating system of Rana kukunoris at three elevations on the Tibetan Plateau, southwestern China, throughout a breeding season. We compared body size between amplectant and non-amplectant males, and among amplectant pairs. For R. kukunoris, the results showed a large-male mating advantage at the two higher elevations and a size-assortative mating at the highest elevation. In addition to sexual selection, we found that the length of the breeding season, population density and operational sex ratio may influence mating patterns.


2019 ◽  
Vol 286 (1912) ◽  
pp. 20191474
Author(s):  
Nathaniel P. Sharp ◽  
Michael C. Whitlock

In sexual populations, the effectiveness of selection will depend on how gametes combine with respect to genetic quality. If gametes with deleterious alleles are likely to combine with one another, deleterious genetic variation can be more easily purged by selection. Assortative mating, where there is a positive correlation between parents in a phenotype of interest such as body size, is often observed in nature, but does not necessarily reveal how gametes ultimately combine with respect to genetic quality itself. We manipulated genetic quality in fruit fly populations using an inbreeding scheme designed to provide an unbiased measure of mating patterns. While inbred flies had substantially reduced reproductive success, their gametes did not combine with those of other inbred flies more often than expected by chance, indicating a lack of positive assortative mating. Instead, we detected a negative correlation in genetic quality between parents, i.e. disassortative mating, which diminished with age. This pattern is expected to reduce the genetic variance for fitness, diminishing the effectiveness of selection. We discuss how mechanisms of sexual selection could produce a pattern of disassortative mating. Our study highlights that sexual selection has the potential to either increase or decrease genetic load.


2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günter J Hitsch ◽  
Alı Hortaçsu ◽  
Dan Ariely

Using data on user attributes and interactions from an online dating site, we estimate mate preferences, and use the Gale-Shapley algorithm to predict stable matches. The predicted matches are similar to the actual matches achieved by the dating site, and the actual matches are approximately efficient. Out-of-sample predictions of offline matches, i.e., marriages, exhibit assortative mating patterns similar to those observed in actual marriages. Thus, mate preferences, without resort to search frictions, can generate sorting in marriages. However, we underpredict some of the correlation patterns; search frictions may play a role in explaining the discrepancy. (JEL C78, J12)


1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
G�ran Arnqvist ◽  
Locke Rowe ◽  
James J. Krupa ◽  
Andy Sih

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document