scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN METODE SAW DAN MFEP SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENYELEKSIAN ATLET PENCAK SILAT

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Siti Qomariah ◽  
Andi Yusika Rangan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Factor Evaluation ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Pencaksilat salah satu bentuk identitas seni beladiri nusantara kebudayaan Indonesia berisitentang pendidikan yang berkembang dalam masyarakat. Dalam dunia modern, silatbukan  hanya  sebagai  alat  seni  bela  diri  tetapi berkembang  menjadi  sebuah  upayadalam  memelihara  kesehatan  melalui  olahraga.  Decision support system (DSS) adalah sistem yang dibangun untuk membantu dalam pengabilan keputusan. DSS dapat dibangun dengan mengunakan beberapa metode seperti AHP (Analitycal Hierarchy Process ) SAW (Simple Additive Weighting), MFEP (Multi Factor Evaluation Process),Weighted Product dan lain-lain. Silat salah satu bentuk identitas seni beladiri nusantara kebudayaan Indonesia berisi tentang pendidikan yang berkembang dalam masyarakat.Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan hasil dari implementasi metode SAW dengan MFEP.

SELEKSI ASISTEN PELATIH BELA DIRI DENGAN PERBANDINGAN METODE AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) DAN METODE SAW (Simple Additive Weighting)

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 088
Author(s):  
Wahyu Joni Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Support System ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Assistant Coach ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Discipline Knowledge

This study was conducted to assist in the selection of martial assistant coach, to determine who is right. Its results will didadaptkan by comparing the two methods in the decision support system, by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Simple Additive Weight (SAW) in limiting the problems in producing the desired solution, using multiple criteria (multi-criteria). AHP and SAW has a different way of doing the calculation. This is done to determine which method is looking for help in making decisions. And in this study are the criteria Discipline, Knowledge, Leadership, Attitude, and Level. And there are sub criteria on Level, which Black (AND I) and Red Black II.

scholarly journals Decision Support System for "Buleleng Cerdas" Program Social Fund Recipient Candidates with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-223
Author(s):  
Aini Aidilah Fitri ◽  
I Made Ardwi Pradnyana ◽  
I Gede Mahendra Darmawiguna
Keyword(s):  
Public Schools ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Scholarship Recipients ◽  
Social Fund ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
Student Assistance ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Hierarchy Process

BAZNAS in Buleleng Regency has a problem program "Buleleng Cerdas". The problems are to make a decision to choose prospective scholarship recipients. The program activities include Student Assistance, One Family One Scholar, and Student Assistance with Achievement. The problems that arise because the selection of the prospective recipients are still manual and the assessment of the final results obtained is relatively long, still difficult to identify prospective recipients who are eligible in accordance with the existing quota, because the candidates Scholarship recipients are spread in the Buleleng region for private and public schools. The purpose of this research is to develop a Decision Support System for "Buleleng Cerdas" Program Social fund Recipient Candidates with AHP and SAW Method and to know the responsiveness of users. This system is supported by a method of decision making, namely the AHP method which is used to find the weights in each criterion, and the ranking calculation with the SAW method. For the testing process, four test process stages are performed: (1) black box test, (2) white box test  (3) test UEQ percentage is positive impression & SUS percentage is 93%, (4) suitability testing of manual calculations on the system is appropriate.

scholarly journals Implementasi Multi Factor Evaluation Process untuk Penentuan Tempat Pembuangan Akhir Berbasis Web Aplication

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-111
Author(s):  
Rahmat Hidayat ◽  
◽  
Ade Irmayanti ◽  
Muhammad Tommy ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Web Application ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Disposal Site ◽  
Prototype Model ◽  
Initial Weight ◽  
Final Disposal ◽  
Factor Evaluation

Determining the final waste disposal site is a complex problem for Lamandau Regency, which is a developing district, the more people there are every year, the more waste is produced. However, determining the location is still done subjectively without considering the influencing factors and is still manual. In problems like this, the decision support system can be used as a solution to help make decisions. This study aims to implement a decision support system in determining the final disposal site using the Multi-Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) method which is applied in the form of a Web Application using a prototype model. In determining the final disposal site, there are 5 criteria to be assessed, namely: Cover Land with an initial weight of 0.2, Rain Intensity with an initial weight of 0.1, Nature Reserve with an initial weight of 0.2, Agriculture with an initial weight of 0.3 and Entrance roads with an initial weight of 0.2, and the number of alternatives consists of 5 locations. The findings show that the error rate of this system is below 5%. After testing all modules or system components, all of them were successful and feasible to be used as a tool in determining the final place of development.

scholarly journals SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK PEMBELIAN HANDPHONE MENGGUNAKAN METODE SAW (SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING) STUDI KASUS PADANG CELL LUBUKLINGGAU

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-54
Author(s):  
Davit Irawan ◽  
Beni Fitcen Abadan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
System Design ◽  
Support System ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Data Flow ◽  
Flow Diagram ◽  
Use Context ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Abstrak Penelitian dengan judul “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Pembelian Handphone Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Addtive Weighting) Studi Kasus Padang Cell Lubuklinggau” mempunyai tujuan untuk mengimplementasikan metode analytical hierarchy process pada sistem pendukung keputusan sebagai sarana bantu dalam pengambilan keputusan pembelian handphone.Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini meliputi metode kepustakaan, wawancara, angket kuesioner dan browsing internet. Sedangkan untuk perancangan sistem digunakan desain sistem meliputi penggunaan diagram konteks, data flow diagram dan flowchart.Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan cara merancang model sistem pendukung keputusan sesuai dengan data yang diperoleh. Kemudian data yang diperoleh tersebut diolah untuk menentukan sistem pendukung keputusan yang akan dibuat menggunakan macromedia dreamweaver, php dan mysql sebagai database. Selanjutnya, sistem yang telah dibuat disimulasikan untuk mendapatkan alternatif pilihan pengambilan keputusan sesuai dengan data yang diperoleh.Penelitian ini menghasilkan informasi berupa ranking atau urutan prioritas alternatif pilihan handphone, hasil dari perbandingan nilai kepentingan antara alternatif satu dengan lainnya menggunakan Sistem Simple Addtive Weighting. Hasil simulasi yang telah dilakukan didapat urutan prioritas alternatif dengan perolehan nilai prioritas yang didapatkan dari hasil penilaian. Kata kunci: Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Metode SAW, Web   ABSTRACT Research with the title "Decision Support System For Mobile Purchase Method Using SAW (Simple Addtive Weighting) Case Studies Padang Cell Lubuklinggau" whose purpose is to implement the method of analytical hierarchy process in decision support systems as aids in making purchasing decisions handphone.Metode data collection used in this study include methods of literature, interviews, questionnaires and internet browsing. As for the system design used the system design include the use context diagrams, data flow diagrams and flowchart.Research This is done by designing a model of decision support system in accordance with the data obtained. Then the data obtained is processed to determine a decision support system that will be created using Macromedia Dreamweaver, PHP and MySQL as a database. Furthermore, the system has been created to get the simulated alternative decision making in accordance with the data of this obtained. Research produce information in the form of ranking or order of priority alternative mobile phone, the result of a comparison of the value of interests between the alternatives with each other using the Simple Addtive Weighting System. The simulation results obtained have been done with the acquisition of alternative priority order priority values ​​obtained from the results of the assessment.  Keyword: Decision Support System, SAW Method, Web

scholarly journals Decision Support System using Multi-Factor Evaluation Process Algorithm

2021 ◽  
Vol 1933 (1) ◽  
pp. 012016
Author(s):  
Bertha Jean Que ◽  
Sulistyo Andarmoyo ◽  
Eka Hendrayani ◽  
Romindo ◽  
Dahlan Abdullah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Factor Evaluation

Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realite (ELECTRE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 257
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rifqi Ali ◽  
Septi Andryana ◽  
Deny Hidayatullah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
High Achievers ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Electre Method ◽  
The Government ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Hierarchy Process

In the world of education, scholarships are financing or subsidies provided by the government, companies, universities, and other educational institutions. This study aims to design and build a decision support system to assist and facilitate the school in determining prospective recipients of scholarship assistance for poor and high achievers with the criteria determined by the scholarship organizer. With this, the researcher designed and built a decision support system using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method which was then compared by the Imple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realite (ELECTRE) method. So that the results of the design of this system are able to assist in determining prospective scholarship recipients. The comparison of the 3 methods shows the results of the ranking of criteria that are slightly different, but basically, the 3 methods can be used properly to solve the problem of determining the scholarship recipient.Keywords:Support System, Analytical Hierarchy Proses (AHP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Elimation Et Choix Traduisant la Realite (ELECTRE).

scholarly journals Decision Support System Design for Determining Exemplary Lecturer using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-42
Author(s):  
Femi Dwi Astuti ◽  
Basuki Heri Winarno
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
System Design ◽  
Support System ◽  
Institutional Quality ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
The Third ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting

STMIK AKAKOM has 67 lecturers. In each semester, an evaluation is held to determine lecturers’ performance to maintain good institutional quality. The evaluation process is based on students’ and Department Quality-Assurance Team (DQAT) assessments.  Up until now, the results of these evaluations were left unprocessed. This study aimed to determine well-performed and less-performed lecturers by combining evaluation results from students and DQAT using the simple additive weighting (SAW) method. There are 17 criteria used in this study with different weight values. The results showed that the technique determined the lecturers’ ranking significantly based on their respective performance.  The most well-performed lecturer is L40 with Vi (order for lecturer) value of 0.95, the second is L41 with  Vi value of 0.92, and the third one is L25 with Vi of 0.91, while the most under-performed lecturer is L67 with a Vi value of 0.72.

SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN DALAM MEREKOMENDASIKAN TEMPAT LES MUSIK DIPEMATANGSIANTAR MENGGUNAKAN METODE MULTIFACTOR EVALUATION PROCESS (MFEP)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresia Siburian ◽  
Rafiqa Dewi ◽  
Widodo Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Music Education ◽  
Support System ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Music Lesson ◽  
Music Lessons ◽  
Factor Evaluation ◽  
The Right

Keroncong, Pop, Dangdut, and Hip Pop. Music is basically to entertain and express themselves from feelings of sadness or happiness. Along with the increasing popularity of music, a lot of music lessons were made especially in Pematangsiantar. This makes consumers confused and needs information to decide which music lessons are suitable for their needs. So the author uses a Decision Support System with the Multi-Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) method to facilitate decision making. MFEP is a method with emphasis on various factors and criteria that perform the calculation of weighting system where the calculation will be valuable for each factor that affects the decision making of data data to be processed. The MFEP method is also called a scaled score that requires a comparative norm to be interpreted qualitatively and this makes the advantages of the MFEP method. The previous criteria were Criteria Place C1 (C1), Music Facilities Criteria (C2), Price Criteria (C3), Criteria Schedule / time guidance (C4), Employee Service Criteria (C5). By using 4 Alternative Place of Music Les existed memematangsiantar include: Legato Art Center, Era Music Siantar, Grace Music Studio, C and C Music Education. Results of recommendation of Decision Support System in Recommending Place Les Music dipematangsiantar using method MFEP (Multifactor Evaluation Process). Which we write with first rank that is Legato Art Center .  It is expected that this research can help the consumer to get the right recommendation in choosing the place of music lesson in accordance with the cost of music lesson and music quality.Keywords: Decision Support System, Multi-Factor Evaluation Process, ranking, Music

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document