Aberrant methylation of 21 microRNA genes in breast cancer: sets of genes associated with progression marks and a system of markers for predicting metastasis

2021 ◽  
Vol 172 (7) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
V. I. Loginov ◽  
◽  
A. M. Burdennyy ◽  
E. A. Filippova ◽  
I. V. Pronina ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. iii29
Author(s):  
J. Martinez-Galan ◽  
B. Torres-Torres ◽  
L. Portollano ◽  
S. Rios ◽  
M.I. Nuñez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-94
Author(s):  
A.M. Krasnyi ◽  
S.V. Kurevlev ◽  
A.A. Sadekova ◽  
T.G. Sefikhanov ◽  
V.V. Kometova ◽  
...  

Aberrant methylation is strongly associated with development of cancer, but limited data exist on correlation between methylation and regional lymph node metastasis (RLNM). The aim of this research was to study using of methylation levels of WIF1, RASSF1A, CDO1 and MEST aberrant methylated genes in a primary breast cancer for prediction of regional lymph node metastases. We used MS-HRM (Methylation Sensitive High Resolution Melting) to assess methylation levels. The results were confirmed by pyrosequencing. The study included 66 women with LumA and 46 women with HER2- (LumB-), 22 and 26 of them had metastasis in at least one lymph node respectively. It was found that methylation levels between LumA and LumB subtypes differed significantly in genes: WIF1 (p<0.001), CDO1 (p=0.002) and MEST (p=0.033). In the Lum A subtype statistically significant differences in level of methylation of WIF1 gene between patients with metastases in RLNM and patients without metastases were found (p=0.03). Analysis of tumors longer than 2 cm in the LumA subtype, revealed an increase of statistical significance of WIF1 gene — p=0.009 (AUC (95%CI) = 0.76 (0.59−0.93)). In LumB- subtype RASSF1A, CDO1 and MEST had statistically significant differences in methylation level between groups (p=0.03, p=0.048 and p=0.045 respectively). ROC analysis showed that combining of three genes by logistic regression, AUC (95%CI) was 0.74 (0.6−0.88). Analysis of tumors longer than 2 cm, did not increase statistical significance for these genes (p=0.046; p=0.089 and p=0.076, respectively). Thus, the study of methylation in primary tumors may be useful for prediction of lymph node metastasis, as well as for better understanding of biological process inside breast cancer.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1466
Author(s):  
Su-Jin Jeong ◽  
Kang-Hoon Lee ◽  
A-Reum Nam ◽  
Je-Yoel Cho

Genome-wide methylation profiling is used in breast cancer (BC) studies, because DNA methylation is a crucial epigenetic regulator of gene expression, involved in many diseases including BC. We investigated genome-wide methylation profiles in both canine mammary tumor (CMT) tissues and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and found unique CMT-enriched methylation signatures. A total of 2.2–4.2 million cytosine–phosphate–guanine (CpG) sites were analyzed in both CMT tissues and PBMCs, which included 40,000 and 28,000 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with 341 and 247 promoters of differentially methylated genes (DMGs) in CMT tissues and PBMCs, respectively. Genes related to apoptosis and ion transmembrane transport were hypermethylated, but cell proliferation and oncogene were hypomethylated in tumor tissues. Gene ontology analysis using DMGs in PBMCs revealed significant methylation changes in the subset of immune cells and host defense system-related genes, especially chemokine signaling pathway-related genes. Moreover, a number of CMT tissue-enriched DMRs were identified from the promoter regions of various microRNAs (miRNAs), including cfa-mir-96 and cfa-mir-149, which were reported as cancer-associated miRNAs in humans. We also identified novel miRNAs associated with CMT which can be candidates for new miRNAs associated with human BC. This study may provide new insight for a better understanding of aberrant methylation associated with both human BC and CMT, as well as possible targets for methylation-based BC diagnostic markers.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Johnstone ◽  
E. Lucas ◽  
L. Kusdra ◽  
A. Goga ◽  
R. Anderson

2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 1178-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Shen ◽  
Christine B. Ambrosone ◽  
Hua Zhao

2003 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvind Virmani ◽  
Asha Rathi ◽  
Kenji Sugio ◽  
Ubaradka G. Sathyanarayana ◽  
Shinichi Toyooka ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Liu ◽  
Daniel I. Jacobs ◽  
Johnni Hansen ◽  
Alan Fu ◽  
Richard G. Stevens ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Skryabin ◽  
E. N. Tolmacheva ◽  
I. N. Lebedev ◽  
M. V. Zavyalova ◽  
E. M. Slonimskaya ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document