scholarly journals The Multidimensional Constructs of Organizational Justice and Organizational Commitment: Empirical Evidence From Public and Private Organizations in Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Fahrudin JS Pareke

<p><em>The multidimensional </em><em>construct </em><em>of organizational justice and organizational commitment has attracted longstanding attention and debate among </em><em>managers</em><em>, researchers and academic</em><em>ian</em><em>s. To achieve significant progress, studies in this area should be directed to investigate the two sides simultaneously, construct validity and substantive validity. </em><em>So that</em><em> the progress achieved can be balanced between the conceptualization and definition of the construct itself as well as the relationship and its effect on other constructs. Therefore, </em><em>current</em><em> study </em><em>intents to test the validity dan reliability </em><em>of </em><em>four-</em><em>factors </em><em>of </em><em>organizational justice </em><em>(FFOJ) construct, and to test</em><em> </em><em>its</em><em> effect on organizational commitment dimensions.</em><em> </em><em>The research respondents were </em><em>264 private employees and civil servants who studying in 3 graduate programs at University of Bengkulu</em><em>, choosen using stratified random sampling</em><em>. </em><em>Two-hundred-and-fifty-seven </em><em>respondents participated in the study. Data analysis </em><em>used</em><em> Factor Analysis, reliability test, and Hierarchical Regression Analysis (HRA).</em><em> </em><em>The conclusions of this study provide strong support for the </em><em>FFOJ</em><em> conceptualization. Of the 20 items </em><em>questionnaire</em><em> included in factor analysis, 19 items </em><em>loaded in </em><em>4 dimensions</em><em>, which is </em><em>distributive justice (4 items), procedural justice (6 items), interactional justice (4 items), and informational justice (5 items). The reliability </em><em>of all dimension are good</em><em>, with Cronbach 'Alpha (α) score greater than 0.7. Almost all dimensions of </em><em>FFOJ</em><em> affect the dimensions of organizational commitment, except the interactional justice that has no effect on the affective commitment.</em><em> Further investigation is</em><em> highly recommended so that organizational justice measurement becomes more workable in explaining the phenomena of justice in the daily life of the organization. The empirical evidence also further emphasize</em><em>d</em><em> the important role of organizational justice in order to foster, enhance, and maintain organizational commitment. Attempts to acquire employees with high organizational commitment will face serious obstacles when </em><em>the</em><em> employees still perceive </em><em>there is no </em><em>fair</em><em>ness</em><em> in the</em><em>ir</em><em> organization.</em><em></em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>afective commitment</em><em>, </em><em>continuance commitment</em><em>, </em><em>distributive justice</em><em>, </em><em>interactional justice</em><em>, </em><em>informational justice; procedural justice</em><em>, </em><em>normative commitment</em></p>

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Fahrudin JS Pareke

<p><em>The multidimensional </em><em>construct </em><em>of organizational justice and organizational commitment has attracted longstanding attention and debate among </em><em>managers</em><em>, researchers and academic</em><em>ian</em><em>s. To achieve significant progress, studies in this area should be directed to investigate the two sides simultaneously, construct validity and substantive validity. </em><em>So that</em><em> the progress achieved can be balanced between the conceptualization and definition of the construct itself as well as the relationship and its effect on other constructs. Therefore, </em><em>current</em><em> study </em><em>intents to test the validity dan reliability </em><em>of </em><em>four-</em><em>factors </em><em>of </em><em>organizational justice </em><em>(FFOJ) construct, and to test</em><em> </em><em>its</em><em> effect on organizational commitment dimensions.</em><em> </em><em>The research respondents were </em><em>264 private employees and civil servants who studying in 3 graduate programs at University of Bengkulu</em><em>, choosen using stratified random sampling</em><em>. </em><em>Two-hundred-and-fifty-seven </em><em>respondents participated in the study. Data analysis </em><em>used</em><em> Factor Analysis, reliability test, and Hierarchical Regression Analysis (HRA).</em><em> </em><em>The conclusions of this study provide strong support for the </em><em>FFOJ</em><em> conceptualization. Of the 20 items </em><em>questionnaire</em><em> included in factor analysis, 19 items </em><em>loaded in </em><em>4 dimensions</em><em>, which is </em><em>distributive justice (4 items), procedural justice (6 items), interactional justice (4 items), and informational justice (5 items). The reliability </em><em>of all dimension are good</em><em>, with Cronbach 'Alpha (α) score greater than 0.7. Almost all dimensions of </em><em>FFOJ</em><em> affect the dimensions of organizational commitment, except the interactional justice that has no effect on the affective commitment.</em><em> Further investigation is</em><em> highly recommended so that organizational justice measurement becomes more workable in explaining the phenomena of justice in the daily life of the organization. The empirical evidence also further emphasize</em><em>d</em><em> the important role of organizational justice in order to foster, enhance, and maintain organizational commitment. Attempts to acquire employees with high organizational commitment will face serious obstacles when </em><em>the</em><em> employees still perceive </em><em>there is no </em><em>fair</em><em>ness</em><em> in the</em><em>ir</em><em> organization.</em><em></em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>afective commitment</em><em>, </em><em>continuance commitment</em><em>, </em><em>distributive justice</em><em>, </em><em>interactional justice</em><em>, </em><em>informational justice; procedural justice</em><em>, </em><em>normative commitment</em></p>


Psichologija ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 46-82
Author(s):  
Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė ◽  
Dalia Bagdžiūnienė

Nors organizacinis teisingumas turi svarbių padarinių organizacijoje, esama vos keleto tyrimų, nagrinėjančių organizacinio teisingumo vaidmenį priimant sprendimus dėl paaukštinimo. Todėl buvo atliktas tyrimas, kurio tikslas buvo nustatyti suvokto skirstymo, procedūros ir sąveikos teisingumo vaidmenį priimant sprendimus paaukštinti. Šiuo tyrimu siekiama išsiaiškinti, kaip suvoktas skirstymo, procedūros ir sąveikos teisingumas yra susijęs su sprendimo dėl pareigų paaukštinimo palankumu, pasitenkinimu darbu ir paaukštinimo galimybėmis, įsipareigojimu organizacijai, ketinimu išeiti, pasitikėjimu vadovu ir vadovybe. Tyrime dalyvavo 132 darbuotojai iš įvairių organizacijų. Tyrimo rezultatai atskleidžia, kad suvoktas skirstymo teisingumas yra teigiamai susijęs su sprendimo dėl pareigų paaukštinimo palankumu ir pasitenkinimu darbu. O suvoktas procedūros teisingumas yra teigiamai susijęs su įsipareigojimu organizacijai ir neigiamai susijęs su ketinimais išeiti. Be to, suvoktas skirstymo ir sąveikos teisingumas yra teigiamai susijęs su pasitenkinimu paaukštinimo galimybėmis. Galiausiai tais atvejais, kai sprendimą dėl pareigų paaukštinimo priima tiesioginis vadovas, suvoktas sąveikos teisingumas yra susijęs su pasitikėjimu vadovu. O kai sprendimą paaukštinti pareigas priima aukštesnio lygio (netiesioginis) vadovas, suvoktas sąveikos teisingumas yra susijęs su pasitikėjimu vadovybe. Maža to, nei suvoktas procedūros, nei suvoktas sąveikos teisingumas nėra susiję su sprendimo dėl pareigų paaukštinimo palankumu.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: skirstymo teisingumas, procedūros teisingumas, sąveikos teisingumas, pareigų paaukštinimas. The Role of Organizational Justice in Promotion Decisions Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė, Dalia Bagdžiūnienė SummaryOrganizational justice perceptions are important for organizations, because they help to predict organizationally important outcomes. However, justice regarding promotions in particular is studied less than other types of organizational justice. Therefore the research was conducted to examine the role of organizational justice aspects, i. e. distributive, procedural and interactional justice, in promotion decisions. The purpose of this study was to determine how perceived distributive, procedural and interactional justice are related to favourability of promotion decision and various levels of outcomes. In particular, this study explored the relationship between perceived distributive, procedural and interactional justice and job satisfaction, satisfaction with promotion opportunities, organizational commitment, turnover intentions, trust in supervisor and trust in management. 132 employees from various organizations participated in the study. The results of the study revealed that favourability of promotion decision (i. e. promotion or non-promotion) is related to perceived distributive justice (Z = –5.867, p ≤ 0.001), but not related to perceived procedural and interactional justice. While perceived justice of decision is related to decision favourability, fair procedures and fair interpersonal treatment is valued irrespective of it. The study also showed that different aspects of organizational justice are related to different outcomes. Perceived distributive justice is related to job satisfaction (β = 0.602, p ≤ 0.01) and satisfaction with promotion opportunities (β = 0.721, p ≤ 0.01). The more decision regarding promotion is considered as fair the more employees are satisfied with their job and promotion opportunities. Perceived procedural justice is the best predictor of organizational outcomes such as organizational commitment (β = 0.676, p ≤ 0.01) and turnover intentions (β = 0.687, p ≤ 0.01). When employees perceive promotion procedures as fair they are more committed to organization and less likely to leave. Moreover, perceived interactional justice is positively related to satisfaction with promotion opportunities (β = 0.138, p ≤ 0.01). Finally, when promotion decisions are made by supervisor, perceived interactional justice is positively related to trust in supervisor (β = 0.716, p ≤ 0.01). On the other hand when promotion decisions are made by upper-level manager, perceived interactional justice is positively related to trust in management (β = 0.682, p ≤ 0.01). Limitations of the study and possibilities for future researches and practical applications are discussed. Keywords: distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, promotion decisions.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiara Annisa ◽  
Riri Mayliza

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the influence of organizational justice as measured by procedural justice, distributive justice and interactional justice to employee job satisfaction. In this study, a sample of 123 employees of Bank Nagari Branch of Padang selected by using purposive sampling method. The analysis method used is multiple regression and t-statistic test. Based on the results of hypothesis testing that has been done found that procedural justice and distributive justice have a significant effect on job satisfaction of employees of Bank Nagari Main Branch Padang, while interactional justice has no significant effect on employees of Bank Nagari Main Branch Padang


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-285
Author(s):  
Icuk Hertanto ◽  
Ade Witoyo

Abstract: PT. X companies engaged in the national cement productionsector which are the market leaders in Indonesia which control the islandsof Java, Bali, Kalimantan and parts of Eastern Indonesia. The result of thisproduct tends to be a commodity product. So, to maintain market control isto maintain the level of availability of cement products. With suchchallenges, PT. X must maintain good relations with its distribution network.One important factor in maintaining good relations between suppliers andbuyers is the Perception of Organizational Justice that exists in both. Thepurpose of this study was to analyze the effect of perceptions oforganizational justice on the performance of the distributors of PT. X withdependence as moderating variable. This research is a quantitative studywith a total population of all distributors of PT. X. This study concludes thatorganizational justice has a positive effect on distributor performance, andthis influence is not moderated by dependency.Keywords: distributor performance, procedural justice, distributive justice,interactional justice, organizational justice, dependency.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 121-128
Author(s):  
Binod Ghimire

This paper investigates the relationship between organizational justice and organizational commitment among the employees of different organizations from Kathmandu Valley. This research study analyzes the impact of organizational justice as encompassed by two components, namely distributive justice and procedural justice on employee’s commitment. This study is descriptive and analytical. The sample consists of managerial and non-managerial employees who have volunteered to participate in the study. This study reveals a positive and significant relationship showing that the foundation of an employee’s commitment is within the application of both distributive and procedural justice, with procedural justice having stronger effect. The findings in this study would offer insight to the managers and business organization in Nepal to formulate strategies that involve in work factors such as distributive and procedural justice for the improvement of the human resource development.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Fakeha Anwer ◽  
Danish Ahmed Siddiqui

While many analysts have directed few investigations on the influence of ethical leadership on the behavior of citizenship, in different contexts, however, not much is known about the moral components make it possible to produce follow-up findings as Organizational Citizenship Behavior(OCBs) for leaders, especially, Interpersonal OCBs (OCBI). For this, we suggested a hypothetical structure, thereby adapting Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara and Viera-Armas (2019) model to include Organizational Justice. Therefore, we intend to study the association of Ethical Leadership with OCBI empirically while in the view of various determining factors of Workplace Compassion (i.e. empathic concern, common humanity, mindfulness, and kindness), and Organizational Justice (i.e. procedural justice, distributive justice, and interactional justice) as mediating variables. Empirical validity was recognized; by directing a review utilizing a standardized close-ended questionnaire. Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structured Equation Modeling (SEM), information was collected from 350 employees and investigated. Both direct and indirect effect was tested; by using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) via SmartPLS software. Thus, the results revealed that: except for Common Humanity, ethical leadership remained significantly and positively connected with all factors of Workplace Compassion (Empathic Concern, Mindfulness, and Kindness), as well as with all three-factor of Organizational Justice (Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice, and Interactional Justice. However, ethical leadership seems to hurt the Mindfulness factor. Also, among compassion determinants, only Empathic Concern seems to affect OCBI. Whereas only interactional justice has a significant positive association with OCBI; further, the findings revealed that there is an insignificant mediating effect of workplace compassion and organizational justice in the ethical leadership relationship with OCBI. Hence, the investigation has portrayed significant ramifications for the organizations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. Layouting
Author(s):  
Fawzi Rizki Pradana ◽  
Heru Kurnianto Tjahjono ◽  
Nuryakin Nuryakin

Research aims: This study aims to determine the mediation of affective commitment on the effects of organizational justice, consisting of distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice, on the knowledge transfer to employees at Diskominfo Kebumen Regency. The purpose of this research is also to find out the effect of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on affective commitment, the effect of affective commitment on knowledge transfer, and the mediating role of affective commitment in the relationship between distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on knowledge transfer.Design/Methodology/Approach: This study used a quantitative approach with the path analysis method. Respondents in this study were employees at Diskominfo Kebumen. The sample used was 78 respondents who were taken by the total sampling technique.Research findings: This study found that distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice significantly and directly affected affective commitment. The study results also showed a significant direct effect of affective commitment on knowledge transfer. Also, distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice indirectly affected knowledge transfer through the mediation of affective commitment.Theoretical contribution: There are few previous studies on distributive, procedural, and interactional justice variables. The difference in this research lies in the research model development and the existing respondents’ characteristics.Practitioner/Policy implication: Based on this research, Diskominfo Kebumen, in the future, can pay attention to the variable aspects of this research in the decision-making process and the development of employee capabilities.Research limitation/Implication: The limitation in this study is that there are still few references related to variables, so mediation is needed. For example, no research addresses the direct relationship between knowledge transfer and organizational justice. Therefore, the scope for exploratory research is limited, and the research model and analysis methods must be adjusted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-121
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD YOUNAS ◽  
IMRAN SAEED ◽  
GHAYYUR QADIR ◽  
SAIF ULLAH KHAN

Turnover is a substantial problem all over the world, in all the industries. The problem is further impairing to the performance of knowledge intensive industries such as pharmaceuticals. This study examined the effect of Organizational justice facets i.e. Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice and Interactional Justice on Turnover Intention. Based on a sample of 141employees from 19 Private sector pharmaceutical companies located in Peshawar. The results reveal that Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice have significant and constructive effect on Turnover Intention while of Interactional Justice had no statistically significant effect. The analysis also shows that Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation as mediating variables significant effect on relationship between Organizational and Turnover Intentions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Kalay

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impacts of three aspects of organizational justice, namely, distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice, on the task performance of employees in the context of Turkey. The study was conducted based on data collected from 942 teachers working in public schools in three Turkish metropolitan cities. The hypotheses were tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques. The findings of the study indicated that among the three aspects of organizational justice, distributive justice has a positive and significant impact on task performance. However, it was determined that the other two aspects, procedural justice and interactional justice, have no significant impact on task performance.


Author(s):  
AGUS BAKU ◽  
NURHIDAYAH NURHIDAYAH

The purpose of this study is to find out empirical verification of the influence of factors in attributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, enforcement of regulations, effectiveness of internal control, commitment and organizational ethical culture on fraud tendencies at the Marisa Sub-District Office, Pohuwato District. The analytical method used is multiple regression. The results showed that the majority of civil servants working in the Marisa Sub-District Office, Pohuwato District, perceive distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice to be in the fair category, regulation enforcement is in the very upright category, the effectiveness of internal control is in the very effective category, organizational commitment is in the very category of commitment and organizational ethical culture it is in the ethical category, while perceptions of the tendency of fraud are in the very rare category. The perception of distributive justice does not have a significant influence on the tendency of fraud. Perceptions of procedural justice did not have a significant influence on the tendency of fraud, meaning that the perception of civil servants in the Marisa Sub-District Office of Pohuwato District was related to procedural justice which was felt to not have an impact on the tendency of fraud. Perception of interactional justice has a negative and significant effect on the tendency of fraud, this result means that the higher the perception of civil servants in the Marisa Sub-District Office of Pohuwato District related to interactional justice, the lower the tendency of employees to commit fraud. Perception of regulation enforcement has a negative and significant effect on the tendency of fraud. Perception of the effectiveness of internal control has a negative and significant effect on the tendency of fraud. Perception of organizational commitment has a negative and significant effect on the tendency of fraud. Perceptions of organizational ethical culture have a negative and significant effect on trends in fraud. Penelitian ini bertujuan adalah untuk mengetahui memberikan verifikasi empiris pengaruh faktor keadilan ditributif, keadilan prosedural, keadilan interaksional, penegakan peraturan, keefektifan pengendalian intern, komitmen dan budaya etis organisasi terhadap kecenderungan fraud pada Kantor Camat Marisa Kabupaten Pohuwato. Metode analisis yang digunakan yaitu regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Sebagian besar pegawai negeri sipil yang bekerja pada  Kantor Camat Marisa Kabupaten Pohuwato mempersepsikan keadilan distributif, keadilan prosedural dan keadilan interaksional berada dalam kategori adil, penegakan peraturan berada dalam kategori sangat tegak, keefektifan pengendalian internal berada dalam kategori sangat efektif, komitmen organisasi berada dalam kategori sangat komitmen dan budaya etis organisasi berada dalam kategori etis, sedangkan persepsi tentang kecenderungan kecurangan berada dalam kategori sangat jarang terjadi. Persepsi keadilan distributif tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kecenderungan kecuranganPersepsi penegakan peraturan berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan. Persepsi keefektifan pengendalian internal berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan. Persepsi komitmen organisasi berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan. Persepsi budaya etis organisasi berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan.    


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document