scholarly journals http://habibiaislamicus.com/index.php/hirj/article/view/229

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Shirzad Azizi ◽  

Allah Ta’ala has declared Nikah with some women Haram due to His specific wisdom. Some of those women cannot be taken in Nikah for some time while the others can never be wedded to some men forever. The ones who can never be taken in Nikah are the foster siblings. Allah Ta’ala has declared Nikah permanently Haram with them. Fostering (Radha’a) means when a child drinks milk of a woman during specific age then that woman becomes its foster mother and her kids its foster siblings. Due to Radha’a, eight types of women becomes Haram for being taken in Nikah; four of them due to parentage and four because of affinity. Islamic countries have adopted provisions of Radha’a in their legal systems. They have taken the suggestions of the Majority Scholars. This study is going to discuss them in detail.

2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-101
Author(s):  
Mohammad Fadel

This book includes eight articles on various aspects of Islamic law in themodern world, as well as an introduction by the two editors. The articles grew out of a symposium held at Georgetown University in 2001 under the title of“Arab Legal Systems in Transition.” Despite the book’s title, however, itdeals exclusively with the Arab world.That said, the articles are generally very interesting and, in some cases,provocative. Wael Hallaq’s article is the most provocative, for he suggeststhat because the traditional socioeconomic infrastructure that supported theShari`ah as a social institution in the pre-modern world has vanished in theface of the centralized state, the Shari`ah cannot be restored without revolutionaryinstitutional changes in the Arab state that would, at a minimum,give religious scholars the institutional independence to formulate a legitimatevision of Islamic law. While there can be little disagreement with Hallaq’s observation that thetraditional institutions are gone and will not return, I am not sure why heassumes that the only type of legitimate Islamic law is one formulated by anindependent class of jurists. May it not be the case that a centralized state,subject to democratic controls, could formulate positive legislation that conformsin a meaningful sense with the Shari`ah’s principles? After all, legalmodernity has generally meant the rise of positive law at the expense ofjudge-made law, with the former greatly eclipsing the latter in importanceand prestige. It is highly improbable that Islamic countries could, even ifthey wished, escape the need for ever more positive legislation to cope withthe unique problems posed by modern social organization ...


2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-64
Author(s):  
Adelaide Madera

This paper examines the condition of women in both Israel and Islamic countries, specifically their freedom to leave a marriage, and compares respective models. First, the study analyses the peculiar relationship between secular and religious law in Israel and Islamic countries. Second, it studies the nature of marriage as a contract in these legal systems, comparing a totally private approach and a mixed, public–private approach. Third, it analyses the possibilities of dissolution of marriage in such legal systems, indentifying some aspects of gender disparity. Finally it discusses some juridical tools offered in these legal contexts, which are intended to rebalance the exercise of a woman's freedom to leave a marital relationship and its conditions.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 196 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
W. J. Bell
Keyword(s):  

Crisis ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilkka Henrik Mäkinen

This article describes suicide-related penal legislation in contemporary Europe, and analyzes and relates the results to cultural attitudes towards suicide and to national suicide rates. Data were obtained from 42 legal entities. Of these, 34 have penal regulations which - according to definition - chiefly and directly deal with suicide. There are three main types of act: aiding suicide, abetting suicide, and driving to suicide. The laws vary considerably with regard to which acts are sanctioned, how severely they are punished, and whether any special circumstances such as the motive, the result, or the object can make the crime more serious. Various ideologies have inspired legislation: religions, the euthanasia movement, and suicide prevention have all left their mark. There are some cases in which neighboring legal systems have clearly influenced laws on the topic. However, the process seems mostly to have been a national affair, resulting in surprisingly large discrepancies between European legal systems. The laws seem to reflect public opinions: countries which punish the crimes harder have significantly less permissive cultural attitudes towards suicide. Likewise, suicide rates were significantly higher in countries with a narrow scope of criminalization and milder punishments for suicide-related crimes. The cultural and normative elements of society are connected with its suicide mortality.


1906 ◽  
Vol 62 (1600supp) ◽  
pp. 25636-25636
Author(s):  
Oxley Grabham
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
pp. 129-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tretyakov

The article focuses on the analysis of the process of convergence of outsider and insider models of corporate governance. Chief characteristics of basic and intermediate systems of corporate governance as well as the changing role of its main agents are under examination. Globalization of financial and commodity markets, convergence of legal systems, an open exchange of ideas and information are the driving forces of the convergence of basic systems of corporate governance. However the convergence does not imply the unification of institutional environment and national institutions of corporate governance.


2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-100
Author(s):  
Raffaele Caterina

“A system of private ownership must provide for something more sophisticated than absolute ownership of the property by one person. A property owner needs to be able to do more than own it during his lifetime and pass it on to someone else on his death.”1 Those who own things with a long life quite naturally feel the urge to deal in segments of time. Most of the owner's ambitions in respect of time can be met by the law of contract. But contract does not offer a complete solution, since contracts create only personal rights. Certain of the owner's legitimate wishes can be achieved only if the law allows them to be given effect in rem—that is, as proprietary rights. Legal systems have responded differently to the need for proprietary rights limited in time. Roman law created usufruct and other iura in re aliena; English law created different legal estates. Every system has faced similar problems. One issue has been the extent to which the holder of a limited interest should be restricted in his or her use and enjoyment in order to protect the holders of other interests in the same thing. A common core of principles regulates the relationship between those who hold temporary interests and the reversioners. For instance, every system forbids holder of the possessory interest to damage the thing arbitrarily. But other rules are more controversial. This study focuses upon the rules which do not forbid, but compel, certain courses of action.


Author(s):  
Daniel Berkowitz ◽  
Karen B. Clay

Although political and legal institutions are essential to any nation's economic development, the forces that have shaped these institutions are poorly understood. Drawing on rich evidence about the development of the American states from the mid-nineteenth to the late twentieth century, this book documents the mechanisms through which geographical and historical conditions—such as climate, access to water transportation, and early legal systems—impacted political and judicial institutions and economic growth. The book shows how a state's geography and climate influenced whether elites based their wealth in agriculture or trade. States with more occupationally diverse elites in 1860 had greater levels of political competition in their legislature from 1866 to 2000. The book also examines the effects of early legal systems. Because of their colonial history, thirteen states had an operational civil-law legal system prior to statehood. All of these states except Louisiana would later adopt common law. By the late eighteenth century, the two legal systems differed in their balances of power. In civil-law systems, judiciaries were subordinate to legislatures, whereas in common-law systems, the two were more equal. Former civil-law states and common-law states exhibit persistent differences in the structure of their courts, the retention of judges, and judicial budgets. Moreover, changes in court structures, retention procedures, and budgets occur under very different conditions in civil-law and common-law states. This book illustrates how initial geographical and historical conditions can determine the evolution of political and legal institutions and long-run growth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document