Hemophilia A and B (Factor VIII and Factor IX Deficiency)

Author(s):  
Rajat Bhattacharya
1980 ◽  
Vol 44 (01) ◽  
pp. 039-042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip M Blatt ◽  
Doris Ménaché ◽  
Harold R Roberts

SummaryThe treatment of patients with hemophilia A and anti-Factor VIII antibodies is difficult. Between July 1977 and June 1978, a survey was carried out by an ad hoc working party of the subcommittee on Factor IX concentrates of the International Committee on Thrombosis and Hemostasis to assess the effectiveness of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates in controlling hemorrhage in these patients. The results are presented in this paper and, although subjective, support the view that these concentrates are not as effective in patients with inhibitors as Factor VIII concentrates are in patients without inhibitors.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Dougald Monroe ◽  
Mirella Ezban ◽  
Maureane Hoffman

Background.Recently a novel bifunctional antibody (emicizumab) that binds both factor IXa (FIXa) and factor X (FX) has been used to treat hemophilia A. Emicizumab has proven remarkably effective as a prophylactic treatment for hemophilia A; however there are patients that still experience bleeding. An approach to safely and effectively treating this bleeding in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors is recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa). When given at therapeutic levels, rFVIIa can enhance tissue factor (TF) dependent activation of FX as well as activating FX independently of TF. At therapeutic levels rFVIIa can also activate FIX. The goal of this study was to assess the role of the FIXa activated by rFVIIa when emicizumab is added to hemophilia A plasma. Methods. Thrombin generation assays were done in plasma using 100 µM lipid and 420 µM Z-Gly-Gly-Arg-AMC with or without emicizumab at 55 µg/mL which is the clinical steady state level. The reactions were initiated with low (1 pM) tissue factor (TF). rFVIIa was added at concentrations of 25-100 nM with 25 nM corresponding to the plasma levels achieved by a single clinical dose of 90 µg/mL. To study to the role of factor IX in the absence of factor VIII, it was necessary to create a double deficient plasma (factors VIII and IX deficient). This was done by taking antigen negative hemophilia B plasma and adding a neutralizing antibody to factor VIII (Haematologic Technologies, Essex Junction, VT, USA). Now varying concentrations of factor IX could be reconstituted into the plasma to give hemophilia A plasma. Results. As expected, in the double deficient plasma with low TF there was essentially no thrombin generation. Also as expected from previous studies, addition of rFVIIa to double deficient plasma gave a dose dependent increase in thrombin generation through activation of FX. Interestingly addition of plasma levels of FIX to the rFVIIa did not increase thrombin generation. Starting from double deficient plasma, as expected emicizumab did not increase thrombin generation since no factor IX was present. Also, in double deficient plasma with rFVIIa, emicizumab did not increase thrombin generation. But in double deficient plasma with FIX and rFVIIa, emicizumab significantly increased thrombin generation. The levels of thrombin generation increased in a dose dependent fashion with higher concentrations of rFVIIa giving higher levels of thrombin generation. Conclusion. Since addition of FIX to the double deficient plasma with rFVIIa did not increase thrombin generation, it suggests that rFVIIa activation of FX is the only source of the FXa needed for thrombin generation. So in the absence of factor VIII (or emicizumab) FIX activation does not contribute to thrombin generation. However, in the presence of emicizumab, while rFVIIa can still activate FX, FIXa formed by rFVIIa can complex with emicizumab to provide an additional source of FX activation. Thus rFVIIa activation of FIX explains the synergistic effect in thrombin generation observed when combining rFVIIa with emicizumab. The generation of FIXa at a site of injury is consistent with the safety profile observed in clinical use. Disclosures Monroe: Novo Nordisk:Research Funding.Ezban:Novo Nordisk:Current Employment.Hoffman:Novo Nordisk:Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 378-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
IM Nilsson ◽  
E Berntorp ◽  
O Zettervall ◽  
B Dahlback

Abstract We recently described tolerance induction with factor VIII/IX, cyclophosphamide, and high-dose intravenous IgG in hemophilia A or B patients with coagulation inhibitory antibodies. Circulating noninhibitory antibodies complexed with factor IX have been demonstrated in tolerant hemophilia B patients. Similar findings are now described in six tolerant hemophilia A patients. Complexes between factor VIII and the ‘tolerant’ antibody were demonstrated by subjecting plasma to gel filtration chromatography, void fractions containing factor VIII/vWF complexes being collected and adsorbed to protein A. Using 125I-labeled F(ab')2 fragments against IgG subclass and factor VIII antigen, complexes between an IgG4 antibody and factor VIII were found to adsorb to protein A. After infusion of factor VIII to tolerant patients, all factor VIII circulated in complex with IgG4 antibody. In three of the patients, the ‘tolerant’ antibodies inhibited an ELISA specific for factor VIII light chain but, unlike the pretolerant antibodies, did not bind radiolabeled factor VIII heavy chain. Although after induction of tolerance the patients still have circulating IgG4 antibodies against factor VIII, the antibodies differ in specificity, lack coagulation inhibitory activity, and do not enhance the rate of elimination of factor VIII.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3516-3516
Author(s):  
Amanda Okolo ◽  
John M Soucie ◽  
Scott D. Grosse ◽  
Chris Roberson ◽  
Isaac Janson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objectives: Hemophilia is a rare heritable bleeding disorder resulting from missing or deficient levels of factor VIII or factor IX. Hemophilia related complications result in high utilization of health care resources and include severe, debilitating chronic joint disease. In 1998, Soucie et al. published the results of a six-year surveillance study investigating the incidence and prevalence of hemophilia in six U.S. states. The study also described the relationship between mortality and morbidity and each patient's primary source of hematologic care (i.e. whether each patient had visited a federally designated hemophilia treatment center (HTC)). The Indiana Hemophilia Surveillance Project (IHSP) aims to identify all persons with hemophilia who resided in Indiana in 2011-2013, to calculate the prevalence and incidence of hemophilia in Indiana, and to determine the percentage of patients cared for at a federally recognized HTC. The IHSP further aims to compare morbidity and mortality data to the results of the Soucie et al. study. Methods: A hemophilia case in this study is defined as a male with physician-diagnosed hemophilia A or B and a measured baseline factor VIII or IX activity level less than 50%. A retrospective review of medical charts and other records was conducted to identify hemophilia cases during the surveillance years from 2011-2013. Case finding methods involved obtaining medical information from a variety of medical care resources including: HTCs in Indiana and surrounding states, hospitals, vital records, Indiana's birth defects registry, hospital and administrative claims data from the Regenstrief Institute, Medicaid claims data, clinical laboratories, specialty pharmacies, hematology/oncology clinics, and primary care physicians. Demographic and clinical data were collected on all identified cases. Data collected included: demographic information, clinical characteristics, joint health assessments, insurance status, clotting factor product utilization and cost, source of hemophilia care, hospitalizations and emergency room visits, and mortality information. Associations between clinical characteristics were assessed for statistical significance using chi-square and fisher's exact tests. Incidence was calculated by using the number of births from prevalent cases during the three surveillance years as the numerator and the number of live male births in Indiana for each year as the denominator. Results: 704 hemophilia cases were identified in Indiana in 2011-2013. Of those cases, 456 (64.8%) had factor VIII deficiency and 248 (35.2%) had factor IX deficiency. The median age of the population was 25 years. 453 cases (64.3%) were adult patients and 251 cases (35.7%) were pediatric patients under 18 years. Among those with known severity levels (n=685), 233 (33.1%) were severe, 185 (26.3%) were moderate, and 267 (37.9%) were mild. Overall, 81.7% of the hemophilia patients identified visited an HTC at least once during the three year study period, which was the minimum requirement for being considered a patient of an HTC. Age-adjusted prevalence was 21.8 cases per 100,000 males; 14.3 per 100,000 for factor VIII and 7.5 per 100,000 for factor IX. Mean incidence of hemophilia over the three year study period was 1:4059 live male births in Indiana. 24 cases (3.4%) died within the study period; 4.2% of the deaths occurred in HIV positive patients. Of those with a known cost of clotting factor (n=184), the average and median cost of factor over the three year period was $375,532 and $71,525 respectively. Conclusions: There was a significantly higher percentage of patients seen at an HTC (81.7%) as compared to the results of the Soucie et al. study (67%; p =<0.001). Indiana has a 62% higher prevalence and 24% higher incidence of hemophilia than in the Soucie et al. study. A high frequency of factor IX deficiency associated with a founder mutation in the Amish community contributes to the higher incidence of factor IX deficiency in Indiana, with a 64% higher percentage of factor IX deficiency among hemophilia cases. The higher prevalence likely reflects improved survival and increased utilization of HTCs in the past two decades. This report is the first follow-up study of the original Soucie et al. report using the same systematic approach. Further analysis on mortality and morbidity complications in this population will be completed and reported in future reports. Disclosures Shapiro: Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sangamo Biosciences: Consultancy; Bio Products Laboratory: Consultancy; Prometic Life Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; BioMarin: Research Funding; Kedrion Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; OPKO: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Other: International Network of Pediatric Hemophilia; Octapharma: Research Funding; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 378-383
Author(s):  
IM Nilsson ◽  
E Berntorp ◽  
O Zettervall ◽  
B Dahlback

We recently described tolerance induction with factor VIII/IX, cyclophosphamide, and high-dose intravenous IgG in hemophilia A or B patients with coagulation inhibitory antibodies. Circulating noninhibitory antibodies complexed with factor IX have been demonstrated in tolerant hemophilia B patients. Similar findings are now described in six tolerant hemophilia A patients. Complexes between factor VIII and the ‘tolerant’ antibody were demonstrated by subjecting plasma to gel filtration chromatography, void fractions containing factor VIII/vWF complexes being collected and adsorbed to protein A. Using 125I-labeled F(ab')2 fragments against IgG subclass and factor VIII antigen, complexes between an IgG4 antibody and factor VIII were found to adsorb to protein A. After infusion of factor VIII to tolerant patients, all factor VIII circulated in complex with IgG4 antibody. In three of the patients, the ‘tolerant’ antibodies inhibited an ELISA specific for factor VIII light chain but, unlike the pretolerant antibodies, did not bind radiolabeled factor VIII heavy chain. Although after induction of tolerance the patients still have circulating IgG4 antibodies against factor VIII, the antibodies differ in specificity, lack coagulation inhibitory activity, and do not enhance the rate of elimination of factor VIII.


1977 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ménaché

The clinical efficacy of Factor IX concentrates in the treatment of patients with Factor IX deficiency is well recognized. The availability of such concentrates has brought a radical change in the management of these patients. The basis for treatment is to obtain an effective Factor IX hemostatic level in vivo. In these conditions, concentrates have been used to reduce the incidence of hemorrhagic episodes in patients particularly exposed and more often to control hemorrhagic episodes or to prevent hemorrhage in the post operative period. Although thromboembolic complications have occured in some instances the major indication of Factor IX concentrates still remains replacement therapy in patients with Factor IX deficiency.More recently Factor IX concentrates have been used for the treatment of patients with antibody to Factor VIII. Although the therapeutic principle(s) responsible for the Factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity has not yet been characterized several beneficial effect of both “activated” and non activated Factor IX concentrates have been observed in such patients experiencing minor or severe bleeding episodes. On the other hand we are aware of some cases without beneficial effect of Factor IX concentrates in patients with Factor VIII inhibitor. The major complication would seem to be an anamnestic response in some patients resulting in either a moderate or a considerable increase of the Factor VIII inhibitor titer when compared to the initial level before Factor IX concentrates therapy. If Factor IX concentrates prove to be efficacious in the treatment of patients with Factor VIII antibody special attention would be required in the manufacturing processing in order to avoid an anamnestic response.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (08) ◽  
pp. 525-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Ljung

IntroductionThe goal of prophylactic treatment of hemophilia is to convert the severe form of the disorder into a milder form by administration of factors VIII or IX. The rationale behind this is that chronic arthropathy, the hallmark of hemophilia after repeated bleedings, is less frequent and less severe in moderate hemophilia (i.e., factor VIII or factor IX concentrations of 1% to 4% of normal) than in severe hemophilia (i.e., factor VIII/factor IX concentrations lower than 1% of normal).1 Keep in mind, however, that prophylactic treatment also provides protection from all other forms of hemorrhage that may occur spontaneously or as a result of trivial trauma in the untreated hemophilic child. Today, prophylactic treatment is available to only a few hemophilia patients in the world, although it is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Federation of Haemophilia (WFH): “Since the main goal is to prevent joint bleeding and its sequelae, prophylaxis should be considered optimal management for persons with severe hemophilia A or B (i.e., with basal factor VIII and/or factor IX levels <1% of normal). Treatment should be started at the age of 1-2 years and be continued indefinitely. Where prophylaxis is not feasible or appropriate, on-demand therapy should be given.”2 In the United States, the Medical and Scientific Advisory Council of the National Hemophilia Foundation has recommended that “prophylaxis should be considered the optimal therapy for children with severe hemophilia A or B.”3 The aim of this chapter is to discuss prophylactic infusion regimens in the management of hemophilia.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3495-3495
Author(s):  
Claudia Bley ◽  
Fabio P S Santos ◽  
Antonio E P Pesaro ◽  
Ricardo Helman ◽  
Sergio A Oliveira ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3495 Poster Board III-432 Background It is well known that patients with hemophilia (both A and B) have a lower incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, patients with hemophilia may develop atherosclerosis, and with increases in life expectancy it is possible that the incidence of CAD may increase in these patients. There are no studies analyzing the prevalence of CAD in patients with hemophilia and possible risk factors. Aims To determine the prevalence of CAD in patients with hemophilia treated in Brazil. Methods All patients with hemophilia in Brazil receive therapy with Factor VIII or Factor IX at government-designed hemophilia centers. We thus contacted all centers in Brazil by e-mail and information from databases concerning health information for all patients was reviewed by the responsible physician at each center. A questionnaire about risk factors for CAD and history of coronary events was sent to patients that had a positive history of CAD. Results There are 6,881 patients registered with a diagnosis of hemophilia A and 1,291 patients with a diagnosis of hemophilia B in Brazil. Fifty-six percent of hemophilia centers answered the query, and information on 71.7% of patients with hemophilia A (4,934 patients) and 61.4% of patients with hemophilia B (792 patients) was reviewed. There were only 3 patients (0.05%) with a positive history of CAD. Their clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. During surgical treatment for CAD, replacement with Factor VIII and Factor IX was done by continuous infusion to increase Factor activity to 80-100%. Antiplatelet therapy was used in all patients at some point, and one patient (#1) developed hemarthrosis after two months of ASA. Patient #3 did not start antiplatelet therapy after CABG, and developed thrombosis of the graft. ASA and clopidogrel were started after percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Conclusion We found a very low incidence of CAD in hemophiliac patients, even after doing a nationwide survey that included more than 5,000 patients. No information about risk factors can be gleaned due to the small number of patients. Surgical treatment after increasing factor activity appears to be safe in such patients. Despite a theoretical risk for increased bleeding, therapy with antiplatelet agents appears to be necessary in hemophiliac patients with CAD. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document