scholarly journals Ciência aberta na perspectiva de especialistas brasileiros: proposta de taxonomia

Author(s):  
Lúcia da Silveira ◽  
Nivaldo Calixto Ribeiro ◽  
Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira Santos ◽  
Fernanda Mirelle de Almeida Silva ◽  
Fabiano Couto Corrêa da Silva ◽  
...  

Objetivo: Este estudo tem como objetivo contextualizar a Ciência Aberta, propondo uma versão brasileira da taxonomia desenvolvida originalmente pelo grupo Facilitate Open Science Training for European Research (Foster), presente no projeto Open Science do Programa Comunitário de Investigação e Inovação, intitulado Horizon 2020. Método: Adotou-se a pesquisa do tipo bibliográfica, documental, descritiva de abordagem dedutiva, com procedimentos do método Delphi. Utilizou-se a pesquisa bibliográfica com o intuito de recuperar documentos que pudessem dar aporte para conceituação do termo Ciência Aberta, em uma base de documentos adicionados no gerenciador de referências Mendeley. Foram recuperados 158 registros e optou-se por apresentar o conceito mencionado em 13 deles, considerando-se os melhores ranqueados e a quantidade de usuários que os adicionaram em suas bibliotecas Mendeley ou observado o contexto da publicação e deste estudo. A segunda etapa da pesquisa envolveu a tradução e ampliação da taxonomia utilizando o método Delphi, reunindo 13 pesquisadores especialistas na temática sobre Ciência Aberta em geral ou em algumas de suas facetas, os quais cooperaram na proposta de inclusão de novos termos da taxonomia, bem como a validação e sugestões de novos recursos e conceitos na tradução livre realizada inicialmente. Resultado: Para a primeira etapa, o resultado das definições apresenta aspectos do ecossistema da Ciência Aberta envolvendo particularidades filosóficas, científicas, sociais, tecnológicas, políticas e econômicas. O segundo resultado desta pesquisa apresenta a proposta de incorporação de novos termos, compondo uma taxonomia com 11 facetas e 82 rótulos na taxonomia. Conclusões: Vivencia-se um momento transitório de transformação na comunicação científica, envolvendo o surgimento de novos movimentos relacionados à ciência e ao fortalecimento de uma infraestrutura que transpassa a tecnologia utilizada, o que, certamente, pode ser notada na proposta de taxonomia construída em colaboração de pesquisadores e especialista que atuam com a Ciência Aberta ou alguma de suas facetas.

2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (2-3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Orth ◽  
Birgit Schmidt

Open Science ist ein relativ junger Begriff, die zugrunde liegende Idee des Teilens von Wissen, Ergebnissen und Methoden ist jedoch so alt ist wie die Wissenschaft selbst. Open Science umfasst neben Open Access und Open Data – dem offenen Zugang zu Veröffentlichungen und Forschungsdaten – auch radikal neue Bereiche wie Citizen Science und Open Notebook Science. Seitdem die Europäische Kommission und andere Forschungsförderer zunehmend Open Access zu Publikationen und Daten in ihre Förderrichtlinien aufnehmen, ist es für Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler unumgänglich geworden, sich mit diesem Thema auseinanderzusetzen. Die Herausforderung bei der Umsetzung dieser Anforderungen ist nicht so sehr die Existenz und Zugänglichkeit relevanter Informationen, sondern die unübersichtliche Fülle an Material. Das von der Europäischen Kommission geförderte Projekt „Facilitating Open Science Training for European Research“ (FOSTER) führt deshalb eine breite Sammlung von Materialien und Kursen zum Thema Open Science zusammen und schafft so eine Lernressource für die europäische Forschungscommunity. Die Inhalte stehen möglichst über offene Lizenzen zur Verfügung, um die Nachnutzung in weiteren Schulungen zu unterstützen. Die Navigation durch die Fülle an Inhalten erfolgt entlang einer Taxonomie oder anhand von zielgruppenspezifischen Lernzielen, die zum Beispiel Projektmanager oder Multiplikatoren wie Bibliothekare adressieren. Der Artikel stellt die aktuellen Ergebnisse des Projektes vor, beleuchtet die Rolle der Niedersächsischen Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen im Projekt und gibt einen Ausblick auf die Aktivitäten im zweiten Projektjahr.


Publications ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Schmidt ◽  
Astrid Orth ◽  
Gwen Franck ◽  
Iryna Kuchma ◽  
Petr Knoth ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 500
Author(s):  
Hali Healy

Transdisciplinary research (TDR) is widely regarded as a promising, and even essential, means of addressing complex sustainability problems, whilst delivering beneficial outcomes for scientists and the non-academic actors with whom they engage. Premised on the 'ecological modernisation' of Europe, regional funding for TDR under Framework Programmes such as FP7 and more recently Horizon 2020 have sought to support academic engagement with a wide range of research stakeholders through calls for transdisciplinary research  in order to better address Europe's "grand societal challenges" (EC 2013). This article, based on doctoral research, consists of an ex-post study of three European Union funded transdisciplinary projects (CREPE, EJOLT and GAP2) implemented under the Seventh Framework's (2007-2013) Science in Society program. Its focus is on how issues of power and governance permeate TDR projects, giving rise to tensions, challenges and ultimately struggles over the very meaning of official projects and their outcomes, despite the most egalitarian of intentions and underlying principles of mutual benefit. These tensions, this article argues, should be understood not merely as cultural, methodological or cognitive challenges, but as essentially political conflicts that manifest and flow across multiple scales. In light of these inherent challenges, the article argues that TDR is always conducted on a terrain of political ecology, and concludes by making recommendations for potential collaborators, as well as for European research policy makers, with the objective of enabling participants and funders alike to realise the transformative potential of this promising mode of research.<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Political ecology of transdisciplinary research, power, governance, Science in Society, European research agenda, agro-ecology, environmental justice, fisheries          </p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 251 ◽  
pp. 02044
Author(s):  
Marion Devouassoux ◽  
João Fernandes ◽  
Bob Jones ◽  
Ignacio Peluaga Lozada ◽  
Jakub Urban

Over the last decades, several data preservation efforts have been undertaken by the HEP community, as experiments are not repeatable and consequently their data considered unique. ARCHIVER is a European Commission (EC) co-funded Horizon 2020 pre-commercial procurement project procuring R&D combining multiple ICT technologies including data-intensive scalability, network, service interoperability and business models, in a hybrid cloud environment. The results will provide the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) with archival and preservation services covering the full research lifecycle. The services are co-designed in partnership with four research organisations (CERN, DESY, EMBL-EBI and PIC/IFAE) deploying use cases from Astrophysics, HEP, Life Sciences and Photon-Neutron Sciences creating an innovation ecosystem for specialist data archiving and preservation companies willing to introduce new services capable of supporting the expanding needs of research. The HEP use cases being deployed include the CERN Opendata portal, preserving a second copy of the completed BaBar experiment and the CERN Digital Memory digitising CERN’s multimedia archive of the 20th century. In parallel, ARCHIVER has established an Early Adopter programme whereby additional use cases can be incorporated at each of the project phases thereby expanding services to multiple research domains and countries.


Impact ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (8) ◽  
pp. 46-47
Author(s):  
Lucy Annette

The Social Sciences & Humanities Open Cloud (SSHOC) is a 40-month-long project under the umbrella of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) and funded by Horizon 2020. This project unites 20 partner organisations as well as their 27 associates. SSHOC seeks to create interconnected data infrastructures focused on an integrated, cloud-based network structure.


Signum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (3–4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pälvi Kaiponen

Liberin (Association of European Research Libraries) 47. vuotuinen konferenssi järjestettiin 4.–6.7.2018 Lillessä Ranskassa. Kokousisäntänä toimi University of Lille, joka on uudessa muodossaan aloittanut tammikuussa 2018. Yliopistoon on yhdistetty kolme aiemmin itsenäistä yliopistoa. Pääosa kokousesityksistä järjestettiin uudessa vuonna 2016 valmistuneessa lilliad Learning Center Innovationissa, joka toimii yliopiston pääkirjastona. Kokousosallistujia oli ennätykselliset 440 ja 34 eri maasta.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Tsekeri ◽  
Volker Freudenthaler ◽  
Vassilis Amiridis ◽  
George Doxastakis ◽  
Alexandros Louridas ◽  
...  

&lt;p&gt;The new polarization lidar nicknamed &amp;#8220;WALL-E&amp;#8221; is designed to monitor dust orientation. Dust orientation has not been extensively investigated for the Earth&amp;#8217;s atmosphere, where dust is considered to be randomly-oriented. For monitoring dust orientation, the new polarization lidar emits linearly- and elliptically-polarized light at 1064 nm and detects the linear and circular polarization of the backscattered light. This is done with two lasers emitting in an interleaved fashion, and two telescopes collecting the backscattered light from both lasers. The measurements are performed at variable viewing angles and provide direct flags of dust orientation, along with more detailed information on particle microphysics. The first measurements for dust in Athens are presented.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;span&gt;Acknowledgements. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;The work is supported by the European Research Council under the European Community&amp;#8217;s Horizon 2020 research and&lt;br&gt;innovation framework program/ERC grant agreement 725698 (D-TECT). We acknowledge PRACE for awarding us access to MareNostrum&lt;br&gt;at Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Spain. The work was supported by computational time granted from the Greek Research &amp;&lt;br&gt;Technology Network (GRNET) in the National HPC facility - ARIS - under project ID pa170906-ADDAPAS, pr005038-REMOD and pr009019-EXEED.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
I.I. Bilan ◽  

The results of the analysis of European Research and Innovation Framework Program “Horizon 2020” calls, propositions and projects with their main subjects devoted to the problems of advanced materials, perspective technologies of their production and processing are presented in this paper. Analysis had been made on the base of Horizon Dashboard data. Horizon Dashboard is the suitable instrument created under the requirements of the European Commission, which presents an overview of evaluated proposals (incl. success rates) and detailed statistics and data about funded projects and their participants, broken down by countries and regions, research domain/program part, organization type, etc. Furthermore, this instrument allows to analyze country and organization profiles considering 38 thematic priorities (four of them: advanced materials; advanced manufacturing and processing; nanotechnologies, advanced materials and production; biotechnologies are devoted to materials science aspects), funding received, participations by region, top beneficiaries, collaboration with other countries, SME participation and more. Data about total project numbers, funding, top participating countries, top participating organizations had been presented for the each of four materials science priorities. Special attention had been paid on the participation level, funding, and success rates of Ukrainian organizations. Situation with materials science thematic priorities in the new European Research and Innovation Framework Program “Horizon Europe” had been described and it was underlined the absence of separate materials science working program in “Horizon Europe”, and necessity of the analysis of several working programs such as “Digital, Industry, Space”, «Climate, energy, mobility» and etc. for the search of corresponding materials science topics and calls. Status of Ukrainian organizations in “Horizon Europe “program till signing and ratification of agreement between Ukraine and European Union about participation of Ukraine in Horizon Europe Program had been clarified. Keywords: research and innovation European Union Framework Program, “Horizon 2020” program, “Horizon Europe” program, thematic priority, materials science, program pillars, grant agreement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document