scholarly journals Tales from the frontlines: An alarming rise in hospitalizations related to opioid use disorder in the era of COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
Noel Ivey, MD ◽  
Dana Cooley Clifton, MD
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Epidemic ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Sharp Rise ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Additional Education ◽  
Harmful Effects

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had harmful effects on the opioid epidemic. While a negative effect was predicted, we report on this reality in the hospital setting. We have seen a sharp rise in hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Our data should encourage ongoing efforts to reduce barriers in accessing medications for treatment, harm reduction interventions and additional education for trainees, primary care providers, and hospitalists alike. In the current climate, these interventions are critical to save the lives of patients with OUD.

Primary Care of Opioid use Disorder: The End of “the French Model”?

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 346-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Dupouy ◽  
Sandy Maumus-Robert ◽  
Yohann Mansiaux ◽  
Antoine Pariente ◽  
Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Private Practice ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Access To Treatment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
French Model

<b><i>Background:</i></b> In France, most patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) have been treated by buprenorphine, prescribed by general practitioners (GP) in private practice since 1996. This has contributed to building a ‘French model’ facilitating access to treatment based on the involvement of GPs in buprenorphine prescription. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Our study aimed to assess whether the involvement of primary care in OUD management has changed lately. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Using data from the French National Health Insurance database, we conducted a yearly repeated cross-sectional study (2009–2015) and described proportion of opioid maintenance treatment (OMT)-prescribing GPs and OMT-dispensing community pharmacies (CP); and number of patients by GP or CP. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Whereas the number of buprenorphine-prescribing GPs in private practice remained quite stable (decrease of 3%), a substantial decrease in buprenorphine initial prescribers among private GPs was observed. In 2009, 10.3% of private GPs (6,297 from 61,301 French private GPs) prescribed buprenorphine for the initiation of a treatment, whereas they were 5.7% (<i>n</i> = 3,539 from 62,071 private GPs) in 2015 (43.8% decrease). GPs issuing initial prescriptions of buprenorphine tended to care for a higher number of patients treated by buprenorphine (14.6 ± 27.1 patients in 2009 to 16.0 ± 35.4 patients in 2015). The number of CPs dispensing buprenorphine remained quite stable (decrease of 2%), while there was a 7.5% decrease in the total number of French CPs across the study period. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our results suggest that primary care providers seem less engaged in buprenorphine initiation in OUD patients, while CPs have not modified their involvement towards these patients.

Facilitators and barriers to utilization of medications for opioid use disorder in primary care in South Carolina

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-39
Author(s):  
Sarah M Oros ◽  
Lillian M Christon ◽  
Kelly S Barth ◽  
Carole R Berini ◽  
Bennie L Padgett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers ◽  
Group Interviews

Objective Utilization of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has not been widely adopted by primary care providers. This study sought to identify interprofessional barriers and facilitators for use of MOUD (specifically naltrexone and buprenorphine) among current and future primary care providers in a southeastern academic center in South Carolina. Method Faculty, residents, and students within family medicine, internal medicine, and a physician assistant program participated in focus group interviews, and completed a brief survey. Survey data were analyzed quantitatively, and focus group transcripts were analyzed using a deductive qualitative content analysis, based upon the theory of planned behavior. Results Seven groups ( N = 46) completed focus group interviews and surveys. Survey results indicated that general attitudes towards MOUD were positive and did not differ significantly among groups. Subjective norms around prescribing and controllability (i.e., beliefs about whether prescribing was up to them) differed between specialties and between level of training groups. Focus group themes highlighted attitudes about MOUD (e.g., “opens the flood gates” to patients with addiction) and perceived facilitators and barriers of using MOUD in primary care settings. Participants felt that although MOUD in primary care would improve access and reduce stigma for patients, prescribing requires improved provider education and an integrated system of care. Conclusions The results of this study provide an argument for tailoring education to specifically address the barriers primary care prescribers perceive. Results promote the utilization of active, hands-on learning approaches, to ultimately promote uptake of MOUD prescribing in the primary care setting in South Carolina.

scholarly journals Development and validation of the Capacity to Treat Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder (CAP-POD) questionnaire

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 263348952094885
Author(s):  
Allyson L Varley ◽  
Burel R Goodin ◽  
Heith Copes ◽  
Stefan G Kertesz ◽  
Kevin Fontaine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
High Quality Research ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Item Questionnaire

Background: Patients with co-occurring chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) have unique needs that may present challenges for clinicians and health care systems. Primary care providers’ (PCPs) capacity to deliver high quality, research-informed care for this population is unknown. The objective of this study was to develop and test a questionnaire of factors influencing PCP capacity to treat co-occurring chronic pain and OUD. Methods: Capacity to Treat Co-Occurring Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder (CAP-POD) questionnaire items were developed over a 2-year process including literature review, semi-structured interviews, and expert panel review. In 2018, a national sample of 509 PCPs was recruited through email to complete a questionnaire including the initial 44-item draft CAP-POD questionnaire. CAP-POD items were analyzed for dimensionality, inter-item reliability, and construct validity. Results: Principal component analysis resulted in a 22-item questionnaire. Twelve more items were removed for parsimony, resulting in a final 10-item questionnaire with the following 4 scales: (1) Motivation to Treat patients with chronic pain and OUD (α = .87), (2) Trust in Evidence (α = .87), (3) Assessing Risk (α = .82), and (4) Patient Access to therapies (α = .79). These scales were associated with evidence-based practice attitudes, knowledge of pain management, and self-reported behavioral adherence to best practice recommendations. Conclusion: We developed a brief, 10-item questionnaire that assesses factors influencing the capacity of PCPs to implement best practice recommendations for the treatment of co-occurring chronic pain and OUD. The questionnaire demonstrated good reliability and initial evidence of validity, and may prove useful in future research as well as clinical settings. Plain language abstract Patients with co-occurring chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) have unique needs that may present challenges for clinicians and health care systems. Primary care providers’ (PCPs) ability to deliver high quality, research-informed care for this population is unknown. There are no validated instruments to assess factors influencing PCP capacity to implement best practices for treating these patients. The objective of this study was to develop and test a questionnaire of factors influencing PCP capacity to treat co-occurring chronic pain and OUD. We recruited 509 PCPs to participate in an online questionnaire that included 44 potential items that assess PCP capacity. Analyses resulted in a 10-item questionnaire that assesses factors influencing capacity to implement best practice recommendations for the treatment of co-occurring chronic pain and OUD. PCPs reported moderately high confidence in the strength and quality of evidence for best practices, and in their ability to identify patients at risk. However, PCPs reported low motivation to treat co-occurring chronic pain and OUD, and perceived patients’ access to relevant services as suboptimal, highlighting two areas that should be targeted with tailored implementation strategies. The 10-item Capacity to Treat Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder (CAP-POD) questionnaire can be used for two purposes: (1) to assess factors influencing PCP capacity before implementation and identify areas that may require improvement for implementation and (2) to evaluate implementation interventions aimed at increasing PCP capacity to treat this population.

scholarly journals Validation Study of a Predictive Algorithm to Evaluate Opioid Use Disorder in a Primary Care Setting

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 233339281771741
Author(s):  
Maneesh Sharma ◽  
Chee Lee ◽  
Svetlana Kantorovich ◽  
Maria Tedtaotao ◽  
Gregory A. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Predictive Algorithm ◽  
Primary Care Patients ◽  
Treatment Changes

Background: Opioid abuse in chronic pain patients is a major public health issue. Primary care providers are frequently the first to prescribe opioids to patients suffering from pain, yet do not always have the time or resources to adequately evaluate the risk of opioid use disorder (OUD). Purpose: This study seeks to determine the predictability of aberrant behavior to opioids using a comprehensive scoring algorithm (“profile”) incorporating phenotypic and, more uniquely, genotypic risk factors. Methods and Results: In a validation study with 452 participants diagnosed with OUD and 1237 controls, the algorithm successfully categorized patients at high and moderate risk of OUD with 91.8% sensitivity. Regardless of changes in the prevalence of OUD, sensitivity of the algorithm remained >90%. Conclusion: The algorithm correctly stratifies primary care patients into low-, moderate-, and high-risk categories to appropriately identify patients in need for additional guidance, monitoring, or treatment changes.

scholarly journals A pilot study of the functionality and clinician acceptance of a clinical decision support tool to improve primary care of opioid use disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca C. Rossom ◽  
JoAnn M. Sperl-Hillen ◽  
Patrick J. O’Connor ◽  
A. Lauren Crain ◽  
Laurel Nightingale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Objective Most Americans with opioid use disorder (OUD) do not receive indicated medical care. A clinical decision support (CDS) tool for primary care providers (PCPs) could address this treatment gap. Our primary objective was to build OUD-CDS tool and demonstrate its functionality and accuracy. Secondary objectives were to achieve high use and approval rates and improve PCP confidence in diagnosing and treating OUD. Methods A convenience sample of 55 PCPs participated. Buprenorphine-waivered PCPs (n = 8) were assigned to the intervention. Non-waivered PCPs (n = 47) were randomized to intervention (n = 24) or control (n = 23). Intervention PCPs received access to the OUD-CDS, which alerted them to patients at potentially increased risk for OUD or overdose and guided diagnosis and treatment. Control PCPs provided care as usual. Results The OUD-CDS was functional and accurate following extensive multi-phased testing. PCPs used the OUD-CDS in 5% of encounters with at-risk patients, far less than the goal of 60%. OUD screening confidence increased for all intervention PCPs and OUD diagnosis increased for non-waivered intervention PCPs. Most PCPs (65%) would recommend the OUD-CDS and found it helpful with screening for OUD and discussing and prescribing OUD medications. Discussion PCPs generally liked the OUD-CDS, but use rates were low, suggesting the need to modify CDS design, implementation strategies and integration with existing primary care workflows. Conclusion The OUD-CDS tool was functional and accurate, but PCP use rates were low. Despite low use, the OUD-CDS improved confidence in OUD screening, diagnosis and use of buprenorphine. NIH Trial registration NCT03559179. Date of registration: 06/18/2018. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03559179

scholarly journals Multilevel Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission Among Patients With Opioid Use Disorder in Selected US States: Role of Socioeconomic Characteristics of Patients and Their Community

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 233339282090424
Author(s):  
Jayasree Basu
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
Us States ◽  
Socioeconomic Characteristics

Research Objective: Using a multilevel framework, the study examines the association of socioeconomic characteristics of the individual and the community with all-cause 30-day readmission risks for patients hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD). Study Design: The study uses hospital discharge data of adult (18+) patients in 5 US states for 2014 from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, linked to community and hospital characteristics using data from Health Resources and Services Administration and American Hospital Association, respectively. A multilevel logistic regression model is applied on data pooled over 5 states adjusting for patient, hospital, and community characteristics. Principal Findings: Higher primary care access, as measured by density of primary care providers, is associated with reduced readmission risks among patients with OUD. Medicare is associated with the highest readmission risk (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, P < .01) compared to private coverage, while Medicaid coverage is also associated with elevated risk (OR = 1.71, P < .01). Being self-pay or covered by other payers carried a similar risk to private coverage. Urban patients had higher readmission rates than rural patients. Conclusions: Patients’ risk of readmission following hospitalization for OUD varies according to availability of primary care providers, expected payer, and geographic location. Understanding which patients are most at risk may allow policy makers to design interventions to prevent readmissions and improve patient outcomes. Future studies may wish to focus on understanding when a decreased readmission rate represents better patient outcomes and when it represents difficulty accessing health care.

scholarly journals What are the impacts when primary care providers diminish stigma for patients with opioid use disorder in British Columbia?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Mary MacLellan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
British Columbia ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Access To Health Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use

Stigma is a complex phenomenon with a myriad of detrimental health and social impacts that are not fully studied or understood. Persistent stigma exists towards individuals who have opioid use disorder (OUD) in British Columbia. OUD is a chronic, relapsing, clinical condition that has been identified as one of the most challenging substance use disorders. For those affected, they must also endure the consequences of stigma that promote barriers to health care, health and social inequalities, diminished quality of life as well as increased morbidity and mortality. The current unremitting opioid overdose crisis in British Columbia further emphasizes the importance of eradicating stigma towards individuals who use opioids and/or suffer from OUD, as untreated OUD is fueling this multifaceted public health emergency. For these reasons, an integrative literature review has been conducted to identify how primary care providers in British Columbia can address the intersecting stigmas for individuals suffering OUD. The results are discussed within the context of primary health care in British Columbia. Whittemore and Knafl’s approach to the integrative literature review was utilized in this study to review eleven pertinent articles. The findings suggest that stigma occurs on varying levels for individuals with OUD that serve to reinforce each other and manifest as discrimination, mistrust, social distancing, minimized advocacy, unequal access to health care and suboptimal health care. Further, the findings indicated that the role of primary care providers may be instrumental in eradicating stigma in a timely manner. Recommendations for primary care providers to dismantle the stigma associated with OUD are discussed, and specific strategies for the primary care setting are presented.

Barriers and Facilitators of Using Telehealth to Identify and Manage Behavioral Health and Substance Use Disorder Conditions in Rural Areas: An Environmental Scan (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naim Naim ◽  
Laura Dunlap
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Behavioral Health ◽  
Substance Use Disorder ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Provider Education ◽  
Opioid Use

BACKGROUND Access to behavioral health services, particularly substance use disorder (SUD) treatment services, is challenging in rural and other underserved areas. Some of the reasons for these challenges include local primary care providers without experience in behavioral health treatment, few specialty providers, and concerns over stigma and lack of privacy for individuals from smaller communities. Telehealth can ease these challenges and support behavioral health, specifically SUD treatment, in a variety of ways, including direct patient care, patient engagement, and provider education. Telehealth is particularly relevant for the growing opioid epidemic, which has profoundly affected rural areas. OBJECTIVE We sought to understand how telehealth is used to support behavioral health and SUDs, with a particular focus on implications for medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorders. The intent was to understand telehealth implementation and use, financing and sustainability, and impact in the field. The results of this work can be used to inform future policy and practice. METHODS We reviewed literature and interviewed telehealth stakeholders and end users in the field. The team identified a diverse set of participants, including clinical staff, administrators, telehealth coordinators, and information technology staff. We analyzed research notes to extract themes from participant experiences to answer the study questions. RESULTS Organizations varied in how they implemented telehealth services and the services they offered. Common themes arose in implementation, such as planning for technical and organizational impacts of telehealth, the importance of leadership support, and tailoring programs to community needs. CONCLUSIONS Telehealth is used in a variety of ways to expand access to services and extend service delivery. As the policy and reimbursement landscape continues to evolve, there may be corresponding changes in telehealth uptake and services provided. CLINICALTRIAL NA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document