scholarly journals Functional results and survivorship after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single center experience from Saudi Arabia

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 299-306
Author(s):  
Ammar Qutub ◽  
Amjad Ghandurah ◽  
Adel Alzahrani ◽  
Ahmed Alghamdi ◽  
Talal M. Bakhsh

BACKGROUND: Isolated involvement of the medial compartment of the knee in degenerative disease is encountered in about 25% of patients with gonarthrosis. We aim to show that in a well-selected group of such patients, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a good option. OBJECTIVES: Review the functional outcomes of patients undergoing UKA and determine the long-term survivorship of the implants and complications of the procedure. DESIGN: Analytical retrospective chart review. SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center and tertiary care private hospital in the western region of Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We selected patients who underwent medial UKAs by the same surgeon between December 1988 and December 2009. The life table approach and the Kaplan-Meier statistical method were used to estimate the survival rate (5–30 years) with revision as the endpoint. Functional outcome scores were determined according to the Knee Society Clinical Rating System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in performance scores for pain, walking, and range of movement. Survivorship of the implants with removal of the implant as the endpoint; post-operative complications. SAMPLE SIZE: 218 implants on 142 patients. RESULTS: The survival rate for UKA was 94.7% at 10 years (95% CI 0.906–0.970), 80.9% at 20 years (95%CI 0.724–0.871), and at 30 years it was 77.8% (95%CI 0.669–0.855) of the total knee arthropathies. The average grand total functional score increased from 61 (maximum 200) at 0 months to above 150 at ≥6 months. CONCLUSION: UKA is a good option for isolated medial compartment gonarthrosis with excellent functional outcome and good survivorship in selected patients. LIMITATION: Single center experience, retrospective. We lost 6.0% of patients during follow-up. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas D. Clement ◽  
Allison Bell ◽  
Philip Simpson ◽  
Gavin Macpherson ◽  
James T. Patton ◽  
...  

Aims The primary aim of the study was to compare the knee-specific functional outcome of robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (rUKA) with manual total knee arthroplasty (mTKA) for the management of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. Secondary aims were to compare length of hospital stay, general health improvement, and satisfaction between rUKA and mTKA. Methods A powered (1:3 ratio) cohort study was performed. A total of 30 patients undergoing rUKA were propensity score matched to 90 patients undergoing mTKA for isolated medial compartment arthritis. Patients were matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and preoperative function. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were collected preoperatively and six months postoperatively. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and patient satisfaction were collected six months postoperatively. Length of hospital stay was also recorded. Results There were no significant differences in the preoperative demographics (p ⩾ 0.150) or function (p ⩾ 0.230) between the groups. The six-month OKS was significantly greater in the rUKA group when compared with the mTKA group (difference 7.7, p < 0.001). There was also a greater six-month postoperative EQ-5D (difference 0.148, p = 0.002) and FJS (difference 24.2, p < 0.001) for the rUKA when compared to the mTKA. No patient was dissatisfied in the rUKA group and five (6%) were dissatisfied in the mTKA, but this was not significant (p = 0.210). Length of stay was significantly (p < 0.001) shorter in the rUKA group (median two days, interquartile range (IQR) 1 to 3) compared to the mTKA (median four days, IQR 3 to 5). Conclusion Patients with isolated medial compartment arthritis had a greater knee-specific functional outcome and generic health with a shorter length of hospital stay after rUKA when compared to mTKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2019;9(1):15–22.


Author(s):  
Noor N. Junejo ◽  
Santiago Vallasciani ◽  
Ahmad Alshammari ◽  
Hossam Aljallad ◽  
Saeed Alshahrani ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1290-1296
Author(s):  
Mazhar Ortaç ◽  
Gökhan Çevik ◽  
Hakan Akdere ◽  
Bahadır Ermeç ◽  
Ateş Kadıoğlu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document