scholarly journals The value of doppler ultrasound in predicting arterial injuries of the penetrating forearm trauma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osman Civan ◽  
◽  
G Noyan Dirlik ◽  
Emel Durmaz ◽  
T Kursat Dabak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Arterial Injuries

23: Renal Arterial Injuries: A Single Center Analysis of Management Strategies and Outcomes

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Ephrem O. Olweny ◽  
Sean P. Elliott ◽  
Thomas X. Minor ◽  
Jack W. McAninch
Keyword(s):  
Management Strategies ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Arterial Injuries

Diagnostic workup and endovascular treatment of popliteal artery trauma

VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheong J. Lee ◽  
Rory Loo ◽  
Max V. Wohlauer ◽  
Parag J. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Injury ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Computed Tomographic Angiography ◽  
Vascular Trauma ◽  
Endovascular Techniques ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Arterial Injuries ◽  
Arterial Trauma ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Abstract. Although management paradigms for certain arterial trauma, such as aortic injuries, have moved towards an endovascular approach, the application of endovascular techniques for the treatment of peripheral arterial injuries continues to be debated. In the realm of peripheral vascular trauma, popliteal arterial injuries remain a devastating condition with significant rates of limb loss. Expedient management is essential and surgical revascularization has been the gold standard. Initial clinical assessment of vascular injury is aided by readily available imaging techniques such as duplex ultrasonography and high resolution computed tomographic angiography. Conventional catheter based angiography, however, remain the gold standard in the determination of vascular injury. There are limited data examining the outcomes of endovascular techniques to address popliteal arterial injuries. In this review, we examine the imaging modalities and current approaches and data regarding endovascular techniques for the management popliteal arterial trauma.

Is Colour Doppler Ultrasound a Sensitive Screening Method in Diagnosing Deep Vein Thrombosis after Hip Surgery ?

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (02) ◽  
pp. 242-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Magnusson ◽  
Bengt I Eriksson ◽  
Peter Kãlebo ◽  
Ramon Sivertsson
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Colour Doppler ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Colour Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryPatients undergoing orthopedic surgery are at high risk of developing deep vein thrombosis. One hundred and thirty-eight consecutive patients undergoing total hip replacement or hip fracture surgery were included in this study. They were surveilled with colour Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and bilateral ascending contrast phlebography. The prevalence of proximal and distal DVT in this study was 5.8% and 20.3% respectively.CDU has a satisfactory sensitivity in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, especially in the proximal region. These results could not be confirmed in the present study of asymptomatic patients. The sensitivity was 62.5% (95% confidence interval: C.I. 24-91%) and the specificity 99.6% (C.I. 98-100%) for proximal DVT; 53.6% (C.I. 34-73%) and 98% (C.I. 96-99%) respectively for distal thrombi. The overall sensitivity was 58.1% (C.I. 39-75%) and the specificity 98% (C.I. 96-99%). The positive predictive value was 83.3% (C.I. 36-99%) and 75% (C.I. 51-91%) for proximal and distal DVT respectively. The negative predictive value was 98.9% (C.I. 98-100%) and 94.9% (C.I. 92-98%) for proximal and distal DVT respectively. The results of this study showed that even with a highly specialised and experienced investigator the sensitivity of CDU was too low to make it suitable for screening purposes in a high risk surgical population.

Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis by Combination of Doppler Ultrasound Flow Examination and Strain Gauge Plethysmography

1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (02) ◽  
pp. 141-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Bounameaux ◽  
B Krähenbühl ◽  
S Vukanovic
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Strain Gauge ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Strain Gauge Plethysmography ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryDoppler ultrasound flow examination, strain gauge plethysmography and contrast venography were performed in 160 lower limbs of 80 in-patients. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was suspected in 87 limbs. Using measurement of venous stop-flow pressure, the Doppler method had an overall sensitivity of 83%. By combined use of Doppler and Plethysmography, sensitivity was increased to 96%. Specificity was 62% and 51%, respectively. With a positive and a negative predictive value of 80% and 73%, respectively, the combination of both non-invasive methods cannot reliably replace venography in the diagnosis of DTV, although all (40/40) thromboses proximal to or involving the popliteal segment were detected by either Doppler and Plethysmography or both.After exclusion of 14 patients (18%) suffering from conditions known to alter the results of these non-invasive methods, the positive predictive value of abnormal findings in both Doppler and Plethysmography was increased to 94% for suspected limbs, whilst negative predictive value of both negative Doppler and Plethysmography was 90%, allowing the avoidance of venography in these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document